Literature DB >> 29267533

Cemento-Osseous Dysplasias: Imaging Features Based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans.

Paulo Henrique Pereira Cavalcanti1, Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento1, Maria Luiza Dos Anjos Pontual1, Andréa Dos Anjos Pontual1, Priscylla Gonçalves Correia Leite de Marcelos1, Danyel Elias da Cruz Perez1, Flávia Maria de Moraes Ramos-Perez1.   

Abstract

Imaging exams have important role in diagnosis of cemento-osseous dysplasia (COD). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) stands out for allowing three-dimensional image evaluation. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of cases diagnosed as COD on CBCT scans, as well identify the main imaging features related to these lesions. An analysis was performed in a database containing 22,400 radiological reports, in which all cases showing some type of COD were initially selected. These CBCT exams were reevaluated to confirm the radiographic diagnosis and determine the prevalence and distribution of the types of COD with regard to gender, age and preferred location, while describing its most common imaging aspects. Data were presented using descriptive analyses. There were 82 cases diagnosed as COD in the CBCT images (prevalence of 0.4%). The distribution of patients was 11 (13.4%) male and 71 (86.6%) female, with a mean age of 49.8 years (age-range 17-85 years). There were 47 (57.3%) cases of periapical COD, 23 (28%) of focal COD and 12 (14.6%) of florid COD. The mandible was more affected than the maxilla. In most cases, the lesions were mixed or hyperdense. All COD had well-defined limits and there were no cases of tooth displacement. In conclusion, periapical COD was the most common type and the most affected bone was the mandible. Imaging evaluation is critical for diagnosis and dentists should bear in mind all possible radiographic presentations of COD in order to prevent misleading diagnoses and consequently, inadequate treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29267533     DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201801621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  9 in total

1.  Benign Fibro-Osseous Lesions of the Head and Neck.

Authors:  Brenda L Nelson; Billy J Phillips
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2019-03-18

2.  Focal Cemento Osseous Dysplasia: A Case Report.

Authors:  Safoura Seifi; Hakimeh Ghorbani; Oveis Khakbaz; Fatima Bijani
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2022-06

3.  Benign mesenchymal odontogenic tumors of the maxillofacial bones: A report of 3 cases with 3 years follow-up.

Authors:  Antoine N Berberi; Georges T Aoun; Georges P Aad; Emile N Khalaf
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2022-02-28

4.  Implant placement in a focal cemento-osseous dysplasia: A modified protocol with a successful outcome.

Authors:  Mootaz Mlouka; Mohamed Tlili; Faten Khanfir; Ali Hamrouni; Mohamed Salah Khalfi; Faten Ben Amor
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-20

5.  A retrospective cone beam computed tomography analysis of cemento-osseous dysplasia.

Authors:  Birsay Gumru; Melda Pelin Akkitap; Sevilay Deveci; Ender Idman
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  Clinical, Radiological, and Pathological Diagnosis of Fibro-Osseous Lesions of the Oral and Maxillofacial Region: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ellen Pick; Tobias Schäfer; Adib Al-Haj Husain; Niels J Rupp; Lukas Hingsammer; Silvio Valdec
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19

7.  Cemento-osseous dysplasia: clinical presentation and symptoms.

Authors:  Inhye Nam; Jihye Ryu; Sang-Hun Shin; Yong-Deok Kim; Jae-Yeol Lee
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-04-30

8.  Bone-related disorders of the jaw: A clinico-radiological diagnostic algorithm.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-03-08

9.  Recurrent symptomatic cemento-osseous dysplasia: A case report.

Authors:  Chang-Ki Min; Kwang-Joon Koh; Kyoung-A Kim
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2018-06-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.