| Literature DB >> 34484583 |
Birsay Gumru1, Melda Pelin Akkitap1, Sevilay Deveci1, Ender Idman1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: Cemento-osseous dysplasia; Cone beam computed tomography; Florid; Subtype
Year: 2021 PMID: 34484583 PMCID: PMC8403794 DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.03.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Sci ISSN: 1991-7902 Impact factor: 2.080
Figure 1Panoramic reconstruction cone beam computed tomography images of a. periapical, b. focal (single posterior tooth), c. focal (single posterior edentulous alveolar crest), and d. florid cemento-osseous dysplasia cases.
Demographic characteristics of cemento-osseous dysplasia cases in relation to subtypes.
| Total | Cemento-osseous Dysplasia Subtype | p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periapical | Focal | Florid | ||||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Age Mean±SD | 46.97 ± 10.57 | 45.14 ± 10.36 | 46.84 ± 10.69 | 47.42 ± 10.63 | ||
| Age group | 24–39 | 39 (%27.5) | 4 (%10.3) | 17 (%43.6) | 18 (%46.2) | |
| 40–49 | 47 (%33.1) | 4 (%8.5) | 20 (%42.6) | 23 (%48.9) | ||
| 50–59 | 37 (%26.1) | 4 (%10.8) | 10 (%27) | 23 (%62.2) | ||
| 60+ | 19 (%13.4) | 2 (%10.5) | 8 (%42.1) | 9 (%47.4) | ||
| Sex | Female | 130 (%91.5) | 10 (%7.7) | 51 (%39.2) | 69 (%53.1) | |
| Male | 12 (%8.5) | 4 (%33.3) | 4 (%33.3) | 4 (%33.3) | ||
∗p < 0.05.
One-way ANOVA test.
Chi-square test.
Fisher Freeman Halton test.
Radiological characteristics of cemento-osseous dysplasia in relation to subtypes.
| Total | Cemento-osseous Dysplasia Subtype | p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periapical | Focal | Florid | ||||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Jaw | Mandible | 117 (%82.4) | 14 (%100) | 54 (%98.2) | 49 (%67.1) | |
| Maxilla | 1 (%0.7) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%1.8) | 0 (%0) | ||
| Mandible + Maxilla | 24 (%16.9) | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 24 (%32.9) | ||
| Region | Anterior mandible | 48 (%33.8) | 14 (%100) | 0 (%0) | 34 (%46.6) | |
| Posterior mandible | 125 (%88) | 0 (%0) | 54 (%98.2) | 71 (%97.3) | ||
| Anterior maxilla | 10 (%7) | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 10 (%13.7) | ||
| Posterior maxilla | 21 (%14.8) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%4.8) | 20 (%27.4) | ||
| Internal density | Hypodense | 13 (%9.2) | 2 (%14.3) | 0 (%0) | 11 (%15.1) | |
| Mixed | 69 (%48.6) | 6 (%42.9) | 10 (%18.2) | 53 (%72.6) | ||
| Hyperdense | 116 (%81.7) | 11 (%78.6) | 45 (%81.8) | 60 (%82.2) | ||
| Effect on cortical bone | Intact | 28 (%19.7) | 0 (%0) | 20 (%36.4) | 8 (%11) | |
| Thinning | 111 (%78.2) | 14 (%100) | 32 (%58.2) | 65 (%89) | ||
| Expansion | 59 (%41.5) | 10 (%71.4) | 13 (%23.6) | 36 (%49.3) | ||
| Perforation | 49 (%34.5) | 9 (%64.3) | 10 (%18.2) | 30 (%41.1) | ||
| Effect on anatomical structures | Maxillary sinus | 11 (%7.7) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%1.8) | 10 (%13.7) | |
| Mandibular canal | 13 (%9.2) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%1.8) | 12 (%16.4) | ||
| Effect on teeth | Root resorption | 23 (%16.2) | 8 (%57.1) | 2 (%3.6) | 13 (%17.8) | |
| Endodontic treatment | 15 (%10.6) | 0 (%0) | 4 (%7.3) | 11 (%15.1) | ||
| Hypercementosis | 17 (%12) | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 17 (%23.3) | ||
| Complication | None | 133 (%93.7) | 14 (%100) | 55 (%100) | 64 (%87.7) | |
| Cyst | 8 (%5.6) | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 8 (%11) | ||
| Infection | 1 (%0.7) | 0 (%0) | 0 (%0) | 1 (%1.4) | ||
∗p < 0.05.
Fisher's Exact test.
Chi-square test.
Fisher Freeman Halton test.
Figure 2Two different axial cone beam computed tomography slices of the same periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia case showing the effects on cortical bone: a. thinning + expansion and b. perforation (white arrows).
Figure 3Panoramic reconstruction and cross-sectional cone beam computed tomography images of two different florid cemento-osseous dysplasia cases with a. cystic lesion exhibiting a well-defined hypodense area with cortical involvement and b. inflammatory lesion exhibiting hypodense area with a hyperdense area resembling bone sequestration and also hypercementosis.
Previous similar studies listed in chronological order with reference number, author(s), country, number of cases, selection criteria of cases, mean age, and most commonly encountered sex/location/subtype.
| Author(s) (year) | Country | Cases (n) | Selection of cases | Mean age (years) | Sex (%) | Location (%) | Subtype (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kawai et al. (1999) | Japan | 54 | histopathology records, clinical records, and radiographs (periapical, occlusal, OPTG, posteroanterior skull radiographs) | 50.8 | female (91%) | (−) | multiplex (67%) |
| Cho et al. (2007) | Korea | 33 | clinical records and radiographs (OPTG) | 55.9 | female (84.8%) | mandible (100%) | focal (51.5%) |
| Alsufyani&Lam (2011) | Canada | 118 | charts and radiographic reports (OPTG, occlusal, periapical, CT, MRI) | 44.3 for females | female (82.9%) | mandible only (81.4) | periapical (78.8%) |
| Owosho et al. (2013) | USA | 35 | histopathology records, clinical records, and radiographs (periapical, full-mouth series, OPTG) | 53.9 | female (94.3%) | mandible (100%) | florid (48.6%) |
| Cavalcanti et al. (2018) | Brazil | 82 | CBCT | 49.8 | female (86.6%) | mandible (91.5%) | periapical (57.3%) |
| Oh et al. (2019) | Australia | 62 | CBCT | 40.2 | female (82.3%) | mandible (100%) | focal (91.9%) |
| Benaessa et al. (2019) | South Africa | 133 | histopathology records, clinical records, and radiographs (OPTG) | 53.4 | female (94.7%) | mandible (95.5%) | florid (69.9%) |
| Olgac et al. (2020) | Turkey | 135 | histopathology records, medical records, and radiographs (−) | 40.6 | female (88.9%) | mandible (97%) | focal (61.5%) |
| Kato et al. (2020) | Brazil | 60 | CBCT | 46.57 | female (96.6%) | mandible (100%) | florid (80%) |
| Present study Gumru et al. | Turkey | 142 | CBCT | 46.97 | female (91.5%) | mandible (99.3%) | florid (51.4%) |
OPTG: orthopantomograph; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; CBCT: cone beam computed tomography; (-) not provided.
Florid + periapical subtypes classified as multiplex.
Overall mean age not provided.
Focal + periapical subtypes classified as periapical.
Focal + periapical subtypes were classified as focal.