BACKGROUND: The achievement of a sustained deep molecular response is a goal of increasing relevance because it opens the possibility of treatment discontinuation. The objective of this analysis was to develop a prediction model for a sustained molecular response with BCR-ABL1 level <0.0032% on the international scale (MR4.5 ) for at least 2 years according to BCR-ABL1 levels achieved within the first 12 months of therapy. METHODS: Data for 603 patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase in consecutive prospective clinical trials were analyzed. The best fit average molecular response was defined by robust linear regression models, with which the average molecular levels were defined. The minimum acceptable molecular response was defined by quantile regression for the 95th percentile, with which the worst 5% BCR-ABL1 levels were identified. RESULTS: In 603 patients with a median follow-up of 103 months, 2002 BCR-ABL1-level data points within 1 year of tyrosine kinase inhibitors were identified. The regression equation for the best fit average levels for a sustained MR4.5 was Log10 (PCR) = -0.1424 × (Months) - 0.8668, and the regression equation for minimum acceptable levels was Log10 (PCR) = -0.1403 × (Months) + 0.6142 (where PCR indicates polymerase chain reaction). To achieve a sustained MR4.5 , the best fit average levels were 0.051%, 0.019%, 0.007%, and 0.003% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively; the minimum acceptable levels were 1.561%, 0.592%, 0.225%, and 0.085% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This model proposes optimal values that predict the highest probability of reaching such a goal. These values can be used to guide therapy when a sustained MR4.5 is the objective. Cancer 2018;124:1160-8.
BACKGROUND: The achievement of a sustained deep molecular response is a goal of increasing relevance because it opens the possibility of treatment discontinuation. The objective of this analysis was to develop a prediction model for a sustained molecular response with BCR-ABL1 level <0.0032% on the international scale (MR4.5 ) for at least 2 years according to BCR-ABL1 levels achieved within the first 12 months of therapy. METHODS: Data for 603 patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase in consecutive prospective clinical trials were analyzed. The best fit average molecular response was defined by robust linear regression models, with which the average molecular levels were defined. The minimum acceptable molecular response was defined by quantile regression for the 95th percentile, with which the worst 5% BCR-ABL1 levels were identified. RESULTS: In 603 patients with a median follow-up of 103 months, 2002 BCR-ABL1-level data points within 1 year of tyrosine kinase inhibitors were identified. The regression equation for the best fit average levels for a sustained MR4.5 was Log10 (PCR) = -0.1424 × (Months) - 0.8668, and the regression equation for minimum acceptable levels was Log10 (PCR) = -0.1403 × (Months) + 0.6142 (where PCR indicates polymerase chain reaction). To achieve a sustained MR4.5 , the best fit average levels were 0.051%, 0.019%, 0.007%, and 0.003% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively; the minimum acceptable levels were 1.561%, 0.592%, 0.225%, and 0.085% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This model proposes optimal values that predict the highest probability of reaching such a goal. These values can be used to guide therapy when a sustained MR4.5 is the objective. Cancer 2018;124:1160-8.
Keywords:
best fit average; chronic myeloid leukemia; minimum acceptable; molecular response with BCR-ABL1 level<0.0032% on the international scale (MR4.5); tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Authors: Hagop M Kantarjian; Neil P Shah; Jorge E Cortes; Michele Baccarani; Mohan B Agarwal; María Soledad Undurraga; Jianxiang Wang; Juan Julio Kassack Ipiña; Dong-Wook Kim; Michinori Ogura; Carolina Pavlovsky; Christian Junghanss; Jorge H Milone; Franck E Nicolini; Tadeusz Robak; Jan Van Droogenbroeck; Edo Vellenga; M Brigid Bradley-Garelik; Chao Zhu; Andreas Hochhaus Journal: Blood Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hagop M Kantarjian; Susan O'Brien; Jorge E Cortes; Jianqin Shan; Francis J Giles; Mary Beth Rios; Stefan H Faderl; William G Wierda; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Srdan Verstovsek; Michael J Keating; Emil J Freireich; Moshe Talpaz Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J E Cortes; D-W Kim; J Pinilla-Ibarz; P le Coutre; R Paquette; C Chuah; F E Nicolini; J F Apperley; H J Khoury; M Talpaz; J DiPersio; D J DeAngelo; E Abruzzese; D Rea; M Baccarani; M C Müller; C Gambacorti-Passerini; S Wong; S Lustgarten; V M Rivera; T Clackson; C D Turner; F G Haluska; F Guilhot; M W Deininger; A Hochhaus; T Hughes; J M Goldman; N P Shah; H Kantarjian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michele Baccarani; Jorge Cortes; Fabrizio Pane; Dietger Niederwieser; Giuseppe Saglio; Jane Apperley; Francisco Cervantes; Michael Deininger; Alois Gratwohl; François Guilhot; Andreas Hochhaus; Mary Horowitz; Timothy Hughes; Hagop Kantarjian; Richard Larson; Jerald Radich; Bengt Simonsson; Richard T Silver; John Goldman; Rudiger Hehlmann Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andreas Hochhaus; Giuseppe Saglio; Richard A Larson; Dong-Wook Kim; Gabriel Etienne; Gianantonio Rosti; Carmino De Souza; Mineo Kurokawa; Matt E Kalaycio; Albert Hoenekopp; Xiaolin Fan; Yaping Shou; Hagop M Kantarjian; Timothy P Hughes Journal: Blood Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 22.113