Literature DB >> 18566874

Statistics in brief: the importance of sample size in the planning and interpretation of medical research.

David Jean Biau1, Solen Kernéis, Raphaël Porcher.   

Abstract

The increasing volume of research by the medical community often leads to increasing numbers of contradictory findings and conclusions. Although the differences observed may represent true differences, the results also may differ because of sampling variability as all studies are performed on a limited number of specimens or patients. When planning a study reporting differences among groups of patients or describing some variable in a single group, sample size should be considered because it allows the researcher to control for the risk of reporting a false-negative finding (Type II error) or to estimate the precision his or her experiment will yield. Equally important, readers of medical journals should understand sample size because such understanding is essential to interpret the relevance of a finding with regard to their own patients. At the time of planning, the investigator must establish (1) a justifiable level of statistical significance, (2) the chances of detecting a difference of given magnitude between the groups compared, ie, the power, (3) this targeted difference (ie, effect size), and (4) the variability of the data (for quantitative data). We believe correct planning of experiments is an ethical issue of concern to the entire community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18566874      PMCID: PMC2493004          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0346-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

Review 1.  Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests?

Authors:  J A Sterne; G Davey Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-27

2.  Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses.

Authors:  L L Kjaergard; J Villumsen; C Gluud
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Sample size and statistical power of randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedics.

Authors:  K B Freedman; S Back; J Bernstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

4.  Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials.

Authors:  Lawrence V Rubinstein; Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin; Sally Hunsberger; S Percy Ivy; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: dynamic strain evaluation of the graft.

Authors:  Milan Handl; Milan Drzík; Giuliano Cerulli; Ctibor Povýsil; Juraj Chlpík; Ferdinand Varga; Evzen Amler; Tomás Trc
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression.

Authors:  F Y Hsieh; D A Bloch; M D Larsen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

Authors:  K F Schulz; I Chalmers; R J Hayes; D G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Management of injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament: results of a survey of orthopaedic surgeons in Canada.

Authors:  F Mirza; D D Mai; A Kirkley; P J Fowler; A Amendola
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.638

9.  Ethics and sample size.

Authors:  Peter Bacchetti; Leslie E Wolf; Mark R Segal; Charles E McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Jason H T Karlawish; Jesse A Berlin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  74 in total

1.  Statistics in brief: Statistical power: what is it and when should it be used?

Authors:  Frederick J Dorey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Using the multi-parameter variability of photoplethysmographic signals to evaluate short-term cardiovascular regulation.

Authors:  Xiang Chen; Ning Liu; Yuanyuan Huang; Feng Yun; Jue Wang; Jin Li
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Characterisation of emission from open-field burning of crop residue during harvesting period in north-west India.

Authors:  Prasenjit Acharya; Sreedharan Sreekesh; Umesh Kulshrestha; Gyan Gupta
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  The Potential of a Relational Training Intervention to Improve Older Adults' Cognition.

Authors:  Michelle E Kelly
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2020-07-01

5.  Fractional Norms and Quasinorms Do Not Help to Overcome the Curse of Dimensionality.

Authors:  Evgeny M Mirkes; Jeza Allohibi; Alexander Gorban
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.524

6.  Lumbar model generator: a tool for the automated generation of a parametric scalable model of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  C E Lavecchia; D M Espino; K M Moerman; K M Tse; D Robinson; P V S Lee; D E T Shepherd
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  A systematic review of odontological sex estimation methods.

Authors:  C Capitaneanu; G Willems; P Thevissen
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2017-12-01

8.  Reporting results of orthopaedic research: confidence intervals and p values.

Authors:  Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Understanding the relevance of sample size calculation.

Authors:  Barun Kumar Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  P value and the theory of hypothesis testing: an explanation for new researchers.

Authors:  David Jean Biau; Brigitte M Jolles; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.