Michitaka Imai1, Kenya Kamimura2, Yoshifumi Takahashi1, Toshihiro Sato1, Osamu Isokawa1, Masaki Maruyama1,3, Takamasa Kobayashi4, Kazunao Hayashi4, Shuji Terai4. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Kashiwazaki General Hospital and Medical Center, 2-11-3, Kitahanda, Kashiwazaki, Niigata, Japan. 2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, 1-757, Aasahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata, 9518510, Japan. kenya-k@med.niigata-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, Kashiwazaki Chuo Hospital, 2-1-25, Ekimae, Kashiwazaki, Niigata, Japan. 4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, 1-757, Aasahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata, 9518510, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Malignant bowel obstruction is a complication of colorectal carcinoma or metastasis from other carcinoma, and it causes significant damage on the condition of elderly patients; however, the self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have been effectively used either for palliation or for bridging to the surgical procedure for this condition. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing long-term outcomes of old-aged patients with SEMS for large bowel obstruction to develop the strategy for those patients in the community medicine. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 42 patients with a median age of 83.0 years (range, 65-99 years), who underwent SEMS placement for malignant colorectal obstruction between 2006 and 2015 in our hospital. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed on data from the patients to assess the factors affecting 6-month survival without stent dysfunction. RESULTS: The study population comprised 24 females (57.1%) and 18 males (42.9%). Of these, 38 patients (90.5%) received SEMS as palliation, whereas 4 patients (9.5%) underwent subsequent surgery. SEMSs were successfully inserted in 97.6% of patients. The median duration of follow-up was 205.0 days (range, 20-1377 days). On multivariate analysis, shorter stents (< 10 cm) yielded better outcomes than longer stents (≥ 10 cm) (P = 0.041), and the Cox proportional hazard model also indicated that shorter stents (P = 0.036) predicted longer event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with malignant bowel obstruction receiving shorter stents had longer event-free survival after stenting with better general condition.
PURPOSE:Malignant bowel obstruction is a complication of colorectal carcinoma or metastasis from other carcinoma, and it causes significant damage on the condition of elderly patients; however, the self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have been effectively used either for palliation or for bridging to the surgical procedure for this condition. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing long-term outcomes of old-aged patients with SEMS for large bowel obstruction to develop the strategy for those patients in the community medicine. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 42 patients with a median age of 83.0 years (range, 65-99 years), who underwent SEMS placement for malignant colorectal obstruction between 2006 and 2015 in our hospital. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed on data from the patients to assess the factors affecting 6-month survival without stent dysfunction. RESULTS: The study population comprised 24 females (57.1%) and 18 males (42.9%). Of these, 38 patients (90.5%) received SEMS as palliation, whereas 4 patients (9.5%) underwent subsequent surgery. SEMSs were successfully inserted in 97.6% of patients. The median duration of follow-up was 205.0 days (range, 20-1377 days). On multivariate analysis, shorter stents (< 10 cm) yielded better outcomes than longer stents (≥ 10 cm) (P = 0.041), and the Cox proportional hazard model also indicated that shorter stents (P = 0.036) predicted longer event-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with malignant bowel obstruction receiving shorter stents had longer event-free survival after stenting with better general condition.
Authors: Eva J A Morris; Elizabeth F Taylor; James D Thomas; Philip Quirke; Paul J Finan; Michel P Coleman; Bernard Rachet; David Forman Journal: Gut Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: H S Tilney; R E Lovegrove; S Purkayastha; P S Sains; G K Weston-Petrides; A W Darzi; P P Tekkis; A G Heriot Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-12-09 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Cristina Martinez-Santos; Rosa F Lobato; José Manuel Fradejas; Isabel Pinto; Pablo Ortega-Deballón; Mariano Moreno-Azcoita Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.585