| Literature DB >> 29264515 |
David Buchebner1,2, Linnea Malmgren1, Anders Christensson3, Fiona McGuigan1, Paul Gerdhem4, Martin Ridderstråle5, Kristina Åkesson1.
Abstract
CONTEXT: In older women, the magnitude of elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) and its consequence is unclear.Entities:
Keywords: PTH; elderly women; kidney function; mortality; vitamin D
Year: 2017 PMID: 29264515 PMCID: PMC5686779 DOI: 10.1210/js.2017-00104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Endocr Soc ISSN: 2472-1972
Clinical Characteristics of the OPRA Study Cohort at Baseline and Follow-Up Visits
| Characteristic | Age 75 y (n = 999) | Age 80 y (n = 693) | Age 85 y (n = 348) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum PTH (pmol/L) | 4.7 ± 2.1 | 5.1 ± 2.7 | 5.2 ± 4.2 |
| No. in normal range (1.6 to 6.9 pmol/L) | 877 (88%) | 512 (74%) | 266 (76%) |
| No. with low PTH (<1.6 pmol/L) | 13 (1%) | 47 (7%) | 16 (5%) |
| No. with high PTH (>6.9 pmol/L) | 109 (11%) | 134 (19%) | 66 (19%) |
| Serum 25OHD (nmol/L) | 62 ± 19 | 78 ± 30 | 79 ± 26 |
| eGFR | 68 ± 15 | 61 ± 14 | 53 ± 14 |
| Serum calcium (mmol/L) | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 |
| Serum phosphate (mmol/L) | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| Height (cm) | 160 ± 6 | 159 ± 6 | 158 ± 6 |
| Weight (kg) | 68 ± 12 | 66 ± 12 | 64 ± 11 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26 ± 4 | 26 ± 4 | 25 ± 4 |
All values are mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise stated.
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
eGFR based on cystatin C and creatinine.
Clinical Characteristics According to PTH Within Normal Range or Elevated >6.9 pmol/L
| Characteristic | Age 75 y | Age 80 y | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTH (1.6–6.9 pmol/L) (n = 877) | PTH (>6.9 pmol/L) (n = 109) | PTH (1.6–6.9 pmol/L) (n = 512) | PTH (>6.9 pmol/L) (n = 134) | |||
| 25OHD (nmol/L) | 63 ± 19 | 54 ± 18 | <0.001 | 80 ± 30 | 70 ± 26 | 0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 70 ± 15 | 60 ± 17 | <0.001 | 63 ± 13 | 53 ± 16 | <0.001 |
| Calcium (mmol/L) | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 0.193 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 0.334 |
| Phosphate (mmol/L) | 1.12 ± 0.19 | 1.13 ± 0.20 | 0.765 | 1.10 ± 0.15 | 1.06 ± 0.15 | 0.004 |
| Height (cm) | 161 ± 6 | 160 ± 6 | 0.539 | 159 ± 6 | 159 ± 6 | 0.558 |
| Weight (kg) | 67 ± 11 | 71 ± 13 | 0.002 | 66 ± 11 | 67 ± 12 | 0.046 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26 ± 4 | 27 ± 5 | 0.001 | 26 ± 4 | 27 ± 4 | 0.074 |
| Current smoker | 127 ± 14 | 7 ± 6 | 0.020 | 58 ± 11 | 7 ± 5 | 0.036 |
| No. of comorbidities (80 y) | ||||||
| None | n/a | n/a | 207 (40) | 40 (30) | 0.025 | |
| One | n/a | n/a | 239 (47) | 77 (57) | 0.026 | |
| Two | n/a | n/a | 63 (12) | 15 (11) | 0.726 | |
| Three or more | n/a | n/a | 3 (1) | 2 (2) | — | |
| No. dead between 75 and 80 y | 72 (8) | 13 (12) | 0.194 | n/a | n/a | |
| No. dead between 80 and 85 y | n/a | n/a | 81 (16) | 22 (16) | 0.865 | |
Values are mean ± standard deviation except for current smoker, number of comorbidities, and number dead, which are No. of cases (%). Information on comorbidities not available at age 75 years.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; n/a, not applicable.
P value calculated using Pearson χ2 test, making comparison between PTH levels 1.6 to 6.9 vs >6.9 pmol/L.
Longitudinal Change in PTH Levels Over 5 and 10 Years With Increases Presented in Increments up to ≥50%
| Change in PTH Over Time | PTH Stable/Decreased | PTH Increased 1%–10% | PTH Increased 11%–20% | PTH Increased 21%–30% | PTH Increased 31%–40% | PTH Increased 41%–50% | PTH Increased 1%–50% | PTH Increased ≥51% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. (%) | 256 (40) | 59 (9) | 56 (8) | 46 (7) | 44 (7) | 45 (7) | 250 (38) | 140 (22) | |
| Over 5 y ( | PTH at age 80 y | 3.5 ± 1.8 | 4.9 ± 2.0 | 5.3 ± 2.0 | 6.0 ± 2.8 | 5.4 ± 2.7 | 5.7 ± 1.8 | 5.5 ± 2.6 | 7.1 ± 3.3 |
| No. (%) | 169 (51) | 26 (8) | 32 (9) | 21 (6) | 16 (5) | 10 (3) | 105 (31) | 59 (18) | |
| Over 10 y ( | PTH at age 85 y | 3.3 ± 1.7 | 4.6 ± 2.3 | 5.3 ± 1.7 | 5.6 ± 2.0 | 5.8 ± 2.0 | 6.3 ± 1.6 | 5.5 ± 2.0 | 9.5 ± 6.0 |
Numbers are based on women who attended both visits at ages 75 and 80 years. PTH levels in picomole per liter. Reported values are No. (%) or mean ± standard deviation.
Mean PTH levels are elevated beyond the normal range.
Figure 1.Elevated PTH above normal range (i.e., >6.9 pmol/L) was not associated with mortality after adjustment for covariates. (a) PTH measured at age 75 years; maximum follow-up 15 years: using Cox proportional hazards model, HRs were estimated comparing normal vs high PTH levels and adjusted for 25OHD, eGFR, phosphate, and smoking. (b) PTH measured at age 80 years; maximum follow-up 11 years: using Cox proportional hazards model, HRs were estimated comparing normal vs high PTH levels and adjusted for 25OHD, eGFR, phosphate, smoking, and comorbidities. Cum, cumulative.