| Literature DB >> 29264237 |
Abstract
The high retear rates after surgery for irreparable rotator cuff tears can be explained by the healing capacity potential of tendons and the native rotator cuff enthesis characterised by complex morphological structures, called direct insertion. Many experimental researches have focused on biologically augmenting the rotator cuff reconstruction and improving tendon-bone healing of the rotator cuff. The results of the experimental study showed that the polyglycolic acid sheet scaffold material allows for the regeneration of not only tendon-to-tendon, but also tendon-to-bone interface in an animal model. We performed a clinical study of the arthroscopic polyglycolic acid sheet patch graft used for the repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears. One-year clinical results of the repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears by arthroscopic patch graft with a polyglycolic acid sheet demonstrated improved shoulder function and a significantly lower retear rate, compared with patients treated with a fascia lata patch.Entities:
Keywords: artificial biomaterials; irreparable rotator cuff tears; operative results
Year: 2015 PMID: 29264237 PMCID: PMC5730641 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2014.11.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol ISSN: 2214-6873
Fig. 1Arthroscopic finding. The irreparable rotator cuff injury was found arthroscopically.
Fig. 2Arthroscopic finding. Arthroscopic polyglycolic acid sheet patch graft was performed for an irreparable rotator cuff injury.
JOA score of each group (points).a
| Prior to surgery | 12 mo after surgery | |
|---|---|---|
| PGA group | 54.9 ± 1.1 | 90.7 ± 1.0* |
| PG group | 52.6 ± 1.5 | 91.7 ± 1.2* |
*p < 0.01.
JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; PG group = patient group assigned to repair with a fascia lata patch graft; PGA group = patient group assigned to repair with polyglycolic acid.
The mean JOA scores improved from 54.9 ± 1.1 points preoperatively to 90.7 ± 1.0 points at the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.01) in the PGA group and from 52.6 ± 1.5 points preoperatively to 91.7 ± 1.2 points at the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.01) in the PG group.
Fig. 3Magnetic resonance imaging finding prior to surgery.
Fig. 4Magnetic resonance imaging finding 1 year after surgery.