Literature DB >> 29263344

Magnesium intake and mortality due to liver diseases: Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Cohort.

Lijun Wu1, Xiangzhu Zhu2,3, Lei Fan4, Edmond K Kabagambe2, Yiqing Song5, Menghua Tao6, Xiaosong Zhong7, Lifang Hou8, Martha J Shrubsole2,3, Jie Liu9, Qi Dai10,11.   

Abstract

People with fatty liver disease are at high risk of magnesium deficiency. Meanwhile, low magnesium status is linked to both chronic inflammation and insulin resistance. However, no study has investigated the association between intake of magnesium and risk of mortality due to liver diseases. We evaluated the association between total magnesium intake and mortality due to liver diseases in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES III) cohort, which included 13,504 participants who completed liver ultrasound examination for hepatic steatosis. Overall magnesium intake was associated with a reduced risk of mortality due to liver disease at borderline significance (P = 0.05). In fully-adjusted analyses, every 100 mg increase in intake of magnesium was associated with a 49% reduction in the risk for mortality due to liver diseases. Although interactions between magnesium intake and alcohol use and hepatic steatosis at baseline were not significant (P > 0.05), inverse associations between magnesium intake and liver disease mortality were stronger among alcohol drinkers and those with hepatic steatosis. Our findings suggest higher intakes of magnesium may be associated with a reduced risk of mortality due to liver disease particularly among alcohol drinkers and those with hepatic steatosis. Further studies are warranted to confirm the findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29263344      PMCID: PMC5738415          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18076-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

All-cause cirrhosis and liver cancer are two of the four top leading causes of death from gastrointestinal and liver disease in United States[1] and globally, the mortality rate due to liver cirrhosis has increased over the past 35 years[2]. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcoholic liver disease, and hepatitis B and C infection are the major causes for liver cirrhosis and cancer[3]. NAFLD is the most common liver disease in the world[4], which includes a spectrum of liver injury ranging from steatosis to severe steatohepatitis that can progress to fibrosis, cirrhosis, liver failure, or even liver cancer[5]. Unlike alcoholic liver disease and viral infections, the etiology of NAFLD remains poorly understood and effective interventions are scant. However, NAFLD is considered a feature of metabolic syndrome[6]. Inflammation[7] and insulin resistance[8,9] play critical roles in the progression of NAFLD. Likewise, inflammation and insulin resistance also may occur and aggravate alcoholic liver disease[10,11] and hepatitis C and B infection[12,13]. One previous study found that serum magnesium levels were significantly lower in patients with either alcoholic or non-alcoholic liver steatosis[14]. People who chronically drink alcohol are at high risk of magnesium deficiency[15-17]. It has been found that prolonged exposure to alcohol leads to a substantially altered homeostasis of magnesium in the liver[18]. In addition to alchol drinkers, as much as 50% of type 2 diabetic patients had low serum magnesium levels[19]. Magnesium deficiency causes inflammation[20,21], while randomized trials conducted among those at high risk of inflammation (i.e. obese women[22], heart failure patients[23] or those with high-sensivity C-reactive protein >3 mg/l[24]) found magnesium treatments reduced hs-CRP concentrations. Moreover, a meta-analysis of randomized trials indicates magnesium supplementation improves insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes patients[25]. Thus, we hypothesized that higher intakes of magnesium will be associated with a reduced risk of mortality due to liver disease regardless of alcohol use or hepatic steatosis at baseline. To test this novel hypothesis, we analyzed the data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) follow-up cohort.

Results

The individuls with fatty liver at baseline were more like to be older, physically active, men, non-Hispanic black, obese, former smokers, and former alcohol drinkers, and to have lower educational chievement and annual household income in comparison to those without fatty liver disease (Table 1). There were no significant differences in intakes of of total energy, total magnesium, and total calcium between individuals with and without fatty liver disease.
Table 1

Baseline demographic and selected risk factors by the status of hepatic steatosis, the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III)a.

Moderate/Severe HSNormal/Mild HSp-valueb
n = 3081n = 10423
Age at Screening (years)
Mean (95% CI)47.1 (46.1–48.1)40.9 (40.1–41.7)<0.0001
Gender, %<0.0001
Male1565 (53.7)4726 (46.8)
Female1516 (46.3)5697 (53.2)
Race/Ethnicity, %0.0015
Non-Hispanic White1075 (74.8)3849 (75.9)
Non-Hispanic Black692 (9.2)3269 (11.4)
Other Race1314 (16.0)3305 (12.8)
Education Level, %<0.0001
Less Than High School1356 (29.4)3462 (20.8)
High School (including GED)906 (35.8)3384 (34.6)
Some College or Above695 (34.8)3283 (44.6)
Poverty income ratio (PIR), %0.055
≤1744 (14.3)2185 (12.1)
1–31312 (43.6)4376 (41.1)
>3734 (42.1)2984 (46.8)
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)<0.0001
Mean (95% CI)30.3 (29.8–30.9)25.6 (25.4–25.8)
Smoke status, %
Non smoker1430 (42.0)5152 (46.0)<0.0001
Former smoker902 (33.5)2200 (22.8)
Current Smoker749 (24.6)3070 (31.2)
Alcohol drinking, %
Non drinker508 (13.1)1673 (11.9)0.0003
Former drinker1128 (35.8)3479 (30.0)
Current drinker1380 (51.1)5055 (58.1)
Exercise, %0.0008
Less active than others768 (24.8)2252 (21.3)
Same as others1477 (47.0)4795 (44.7)
More active than others767 (28.2)3227 (34.0)
Daily nutrients intake, Mean (95% CI)
Energy (kcal)2465.9 (2175.7–2756.0)2729.6 (2371.8–3087.3)0.24
Total calcium intake (mg)866.5 (823.0–910.0)873.0 (845.7–900.4)0.73
Total magnesium intake (mg)320.7 (309.1–332.3)323.4 (316.7–330.0)0.65

aValues presented are unweighted frequencies (weighted percentage, %) or weighted mean (95% CI).

bRao-Scott chi-square test for categorical data, and survey regression model for continuous variables.

Baseline demographic and selected risk factors by the status of hepatic steatosis, the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III)a. aValues presented are unweighted frequencies (weighted percentage, %) or weighted mean (95% CI). bRao-Scott chi-square test for categorical data, and survey regression model for continuous variables. We observed that high total intake of magnesium was significantly associated with a reduced risk of mortality due to liver disease in models 1 although the association became of borderline significance (p = 0.05) after further adjusting for other potential confounders. There was a 49% reduction in risk of death from liver disease for every 100 mg increase in magnesium intake. Tests for interactions between magnesium intake and potential effect modifiers namely fatty liver status (p = 0.84) and alcohol drinking status (p = 0.86) were not significant. However, the inverse associations between magnesium and death from liver disease were significant among those with fatty liver disease (HR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.14–0.89) and of borderline significance among alcohol drinkers (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22–0.99) (Table 2). Similar findings were found in analyses by quantiles (including tertiles and quartiles). We did not find calcium intake was significantly related to the risk of mortality due to liver disease.
Table 2

Magnesium intake and hazard ratios (95% CIs) for mortality due to liver disease stratified by status of hepatic steatosis or alcohol drinking at baseline, Third National health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988–1994a,b,c.

TotalModel 1Model 2Model 3
N = 13504N = 13442N = 11545
HR per 100 mg/d (95% CI)0.59 (0.38, 0.93)0.54 (0.30–1.00)0.51 (0.26–1.01)
P-value0.020.050.05
No hepatic steatosisN = 10423N = 10371N = 8979
HR per 100 mg/d (95% CI)0.54 (0.30, 0.99)0.56 (0.25, 1.21)0.57 (0.23–1.39)
P-value0.050.140.21
Hepatic steatosisN = 3081N = 3071N = 2566
HR per 100 mg/d (95% CI)0.69 (0.36, 1.31)0.53 (0.25–1.11)0.35 (0.14–0.89)
P-value0.250.090.03
Never alcohol drinkingN = 2179N = 2168N = 1769
HR per 100 mg/d (95% CI)1.02 (0.74, 1.42)0.85 (0.39–1.85)1.04 (0.23–4.58)
P value0.890.680.96
Current/ever alcohol drinkingN = 11034N = 10997N = 9776
HR per 100 mg/d (95% CI)0.50 (0.28, 0.87)0.50 (0.23–1.00)0.46 (0.22–0.99)
P-value0.0160.050.05

aCox’s proportional hazards model was performed with the SURVEYPHREG procedure to estimate

hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Model 1: Adjusted for age; Model 2: Additionally adjusted for total energy intake; Model 3: Further adjusted for race, sex, BMI, waist to hip ratio, education attainment, household income, physical activity, smoking status, intake of calcium, or alcohol drinking.

bUnweighted N for each model differs due to some missing data for some covariates.

cP values for the interactions between magnesium intake (continuous) and hepatic steatosis (yes/no), drinking status (yes/no) for the specific mortality were 0.84 and 0.86 respectively.

Magnesium intake and hazard ratios (95% CIs) for mortality due to liver disease stratified by status of hepatic steatosis or alcohol drinking at baseline, Third National health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988–1994a,b,c. aCox’s proportional hazards model was performed with the SURVEYPHREG procedure to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Model 1: Adjusted for age; Model 2: Additionally adjusted for total energy intake; Model 3: Further adjusted for race, sex, BMI, waist to hip ratio, education attainment, household income, physical activity, smoking status, intake of calcium, or alcohol drinking. bUnweighted N for each model differs due to some missing data for some covariates. cP values for the interactions between magnesium intake (continuous) and hepatic steatosis (yes/no), drinking status (yes/no) for the specific mortality were 0.84 and 0.86 respectively.

Discussion

Consistent with our hypothesis, we observed that high intake of magnesium was associated with a reduced risk of mortality due to liver disease in this NHANES III cohort, a nationally representative sample of the U.S. general population that included participants from all across the US. This observed inverse association was more apparent in those with fatty liver disease and among alcohol drinkers at baseline although the test for the interactions was not statistically significant. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between magnesium intake and mortality due to liver disease. Our finding that high magnesium intake was associated with a reduced risk of mortality due to liver disease is promising. The underlying mechanism is not entirely clear. However, the finding has very significant public health and clinical significace because it was reported in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999–2000, that 79% of US adults do not meet the Recommended Dietary Allowance for magnesium[26]. One study observed that serum concentrations of magnesium were significantly reduced in patients with either alcoholic or non-alcoholic liver steatosis[14]. The findings are not surprising because of previous studies that found that people who regularly drink alcohol and those with type 2 diabetes are at high risk of magnesium deficiency[15-17]. For instance, 50% of people with type 2 diabetes had hypomagnesemia[19]. Studies conducted in the US and other Western populations show that low magnesium intake is associated with an elevated risk of insulin resistance[27,28], systemic inflammation[29,30], metabolic syndrome[31-33], subclinical atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes[34-37]. Since NAFLD is considered a characteristic of metabolic syndrome[6], there is preliminary evidence indicating magnesium does have a role in liver disease despite an unclear mechanism. Previous studies indicate that inflammation and insulin resistance play important roles in the progression of NAFLD[6-9],alcoholic liver disease[10,11] and hepatitis C and B[12,13]. Furthermore, randomized trials found magnesium treatment improved both inflammation and insulin resistance in participants at high risks of inflammation, insulin resistance, particularly those at high risk of magnesium deficiency. Therefore, supplements or high intakes of magnesium may prevent the progression of liver disease in those at high risk of magnesium deficiency, especially if they also have elevated inflammation levels and insulin resistance[22-25]. In this regard, it is plausible that adequate magnesium intake, which is related to improved insulin senstivity and inflammation, may slow development and progression of steatohepatitis and steatosis and in turn reduce the risk of mortality due to liver disease. This may provide a possible explanantion for the observation of an inverse association between magnesium and death from liver disease in the current study. A strength of our study is that it is based on NHANES, a population-based study with a nationally representative sample. Although multiple 24-hour dietary recalls are used as a gold standard measure in nutritional epidemiologic studies, a one-time 24-hour dietary recall used in the current study may not have adequately captured long-term dietary intake of magnesium. Since inter-day variation in magnesium intake is random, any residual inter-day variation in the current study would lead to non-differential misclassification, which usually biases the result to the null. Thus, the true association between magnesium intake and mortality due to liver disease may be stronger than what we have observed. We cannot eliminate the possibility that the inverse associations with magnesium intake are due to redusidual confounding factors or healthy lifestyle in general. However, we have adjusted for physical activity and intake of calcium in all our analyses. Furthermore, in the same analysis, we did not find total intake of calcium to be related to the risk of death from liver disease. Thus, our finding for magnesium is unlikely to be due to confounding by healthy lifestyle in general because we have adjusted for physical activity and those who possess healthy behaviors are much more like to consume calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D than magnesium supplementation. We additionally adjusted for the intake of fiber in the model and found similar results (data not shown). We did not find any significant associations between the Ca:Mg intake ratio and risk of mortality due to liver disease. The association per se may not be accurate. For example, a high ratio could mean a high intake of calcium or low intake of magnesium. In our previous studies, we used the joint associations of Ca:Mg ratios with intakes of calcium or magnesium[38]. However, the power is not enough for this analysis in the current study. We also conducted an analysis and found that Mg/calories was not significantly related to the risk (data not shown). A nutrient density approach was proposed for energy-dense macronutrients, such as protein, carbohydrates and fats[39]. One possible explanation for the non-significant association could be that magnesium is not an energy dense macro-nutrient. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings. One weakness is that no additional assessments were conducted after the baseline evaluation of magnesium intake level. Also, since we used 24-hour dietary recall data instead of food frequency questionnaire data, we were not able to analyze the associations between specific foods rich in magnesium and calcium in relation to risk of mortality due to liver disease. In addition, the intake of magnesium and calcium from water has not been considered and this may lead to non-differential misclassification, which usually biases the results the null. Future studies are needed to investigate these associations. In stratified analyses, we found the inverse associations seemed only of borderline significance among those with fatty liver or those who were alcohol drinkers at baseline. These findings are plausible because those with fatty liver at baseline are less likely to be alcohol drinkers as shown in Table 1. The interactions of magnesium intake with both fatty liver status and alcohol drinking status are not statistically significant. However, the non-significant interactions could, in part, be due to the small sample sizes in subgroup analyses. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to replicate the findings. In conclusion, our findings suggest that high intake of magnesium may be associated with a reduced risk of mortality due to liver disease. However, further studies, including randomized trials, are warranted to confirm the findings.

Methods

Study Population and Outcomes

The NHANES III was conducted in the United States from 1988 through 1994 by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)[40]. The survey was approved by the institutional review board of the CDC, and all participants provided written informed consent to participate. Publically available data without personal identifiable information were used for the current study. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. It consisted of interview, medical examination, and laboratory data collected from a complex multistage, stratified, clustered probability sample representative of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population. In total, 33,994 persons aged 2 months and older participated in the survey. Participants were excluded if they were aged younger than 20 years old (15,169), with missing hepatic steatosis status data (4,969). We also excluded those with missing data on magnesium intake (352). Finally we included 13,504 participants in our study cohort. These participants were followed for mortality status from baseline until December 31, 2006. The median follow-up time was 14.6 years. Mortality outcomes were determined by using probabilistic linkage with the National Death Index (NDI). Cause of death coding for all U.S. deaths occurring prior to 1999 follows the 9th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death (ICD-9) guidelines, while all deaths after 1998 follows the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death (ICD-10) guidenlines. Mortality due to liver disease included participants who died of malignant neoplasms of liver and intrahepatic bile ducts, chronic liver disease and cirrhosis.

Nutrient Intake Assessments

Daily dietary intake data were obtained from one 24-hour dietary recall and 30-day supplement interviews, which were obtained at the baseline and were described in detail elsewhere[41]. Only dietary recall data with a status of ‘reliable’ were used in the analysis. Supplemental intake of magnesium was obtained from the response to a dietary supplement questionnaire. Total intake of magnesium was calculated by summing intakes from diet and supplements.

Hepatic Steatosis

The ultrasound examination was recorded using a Toshiba Sonolayer SSA-90A and Toshiba video recorder among participants aged 20 to 74 years in NHANES III between 1988 and 1994. In 2009–2010, archived gall bladder ultrasound video images were reviewed to assess the presence of fat within the hepatic parenchyma using standard criteria. Using five criteria (liver to kidney contrast; brightness of the liver parenchyma; deep beam attenuation; echogenic walls in the small intrahepatic vessels; and the definition of the gallbladder walls), hepatic steatosis was categorized as normal, mild, moderate, or severe. In order to avoid potential overlap between mild and moderate hepatic steatosis, a categorization of hepatic steatosis as “yes” or “no” was generally used. “Yes” indicates moderate or severe hepatic steatosis, while “No” indicates the liver was normal or had mild hepatic steatosis[42].

Covariates

We considered a number of factors as potential confounding factors, including sex (male, female); race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and other race); education (lower than high school education, high school diploma, and college graduate or above); ratio of poverty to income (PIR: ≤1, 1–3, >3); cigarette smoking status (never, former, current); alcohol drinking status (never, former, current); exercise (compared with most men or women of your age, you are less active, about the same, more active). Age, daily intakes of total energy (kcal), calcium (mg), magnesium (mg), body mass index (BMI) were included as continuous variables for adjustment in models.

Statistical Analysis

We performed statistical analyses using the “Survey” procedure in SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) to estimate variance after incorporating the weights for the sample population in NHANES III cohort. For individuals who were not known to be deceased or who died from other causes, observations were censored at the date of death or December 31, 2011, whichever was earlier. Covariates were compared among the normal or mild hepatic steatosis group and the moderate to severe hepatic steatosis group to evaluate potential confounding factors using Rao-Scott chi-square test for categorical data and survey regression model for continuous variables. In addition to examining calcium as a potential confounding factor, we also examined whether intake of calcium was related to risk of mortality due to liver disease. Hazard ratios (HR) and (95% CIs) for the association between magnesium intake and mortality due to liver diease were estimated from Cox proportional hazard regression models fitted using PROC SURVEYPHREG procedure in SAS. HRs for mortality due to liver disease were estimated per every 100 mg increase in magnesium or calcium intake. Additionally we performed analyses stratified by hepatic steatosis and alcohol drinking status at baseline. P values are two-sided and were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 in all analyses.
  39 in total

1.  Inflammatory response following acute magnesium deficiency in the rat.

Authors:  C Malpuech-Brugère; W Nowacki; M Daveau; E Gueux; C Linard; E Rock; J Lebreton; A Mazur; Y Rayssiguier
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2000-06-15

2.  Effects of oral magnesium supplementation on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled trials.

Authors:  Y Song; K He; E B Levitan; J E Manson; S Liu
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Serum magnesium levels in patients with alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver.

Authors:  L Turecky; V Kupcova; M Szantova; E Uhlikova; A Viktorinova; A Czirfusz
Journal:  Bratisl Lek Listy       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.278

Review 4.  Magnesium intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S C Larsson; A Wolk
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Hypomagnesemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Vicious Circle?

Authors:  Lisanne M M Gommers; Joost G J Hoenderop; René J M Bindels; Jeroen H F de Baaij
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 6.  Type 2 diabetes as an inflammatory cardiovascular disorder.

Authors:  D Ziegler
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.222

7.  Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the United States: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.

Authors:  Mariana Lazo; Ruben Hernaez; Mark S Eberhardt; Susanne Bonekamp; Ihab Kamel; Eliseo Guallar; Ayman Koteish; Frederick L Brancati; Jeanne M Clark
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Magnesium deficiency and alcohol intake: mechanisms, clinical significance and possible relation to cancer development (a review).

Authors:  R S Rivlin
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Fiber and magnesium intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthias B Schulze; Mandy Schulz; Christin Heidemann; Anja Schienkiewitz; Kurt Hoffmann; Heiner Boeing
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-14

10.  Modifying effect of calcium/magnesium intake ratio and mortality: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Qi Dai; Xiao-Ou Shu; Xinqing Deng; Yong-Bing Xiang; Honglan Li; Gong Yang; Martha J Shrubsole; Butian Ji; Hui Cai; Wong-Ho Chow; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Magnesium and liver disease.

Authors:  Meixi Liu; Huayu Yang; Yilei Mao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

2.  Cross-sectional analysis of the health profile and dietary intake of a sample of Canadian adults diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Michelle L Aktary; Lindsay K Eller; Alissa C Nicolucci; Raylene A Reimer
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Intakes of magnesium, calcium and risk of fatty liver disease and prediabetes.

Authors:  Wenshuai Li; Xiangzhu Zhu; Yiqing Song; Lei Fan; Lijun Wu; Edmond K Kabagambe; Lifang Hou; Martha J Shrubsole; Jie Liu; Qi Dai
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Lower Serum Magnesium Concentrations are associated With Specific Heavy Drinking Markers, Pro-Inflammatory Response and Early-Stage Alcohol-associated Liver Injury§.

Authors:  Vatsalya Vatsalya; Khushboo S Gala; Maithili Mishra; Melanie L Schwandt; John Umhau; Matthew C Cave; Dipendra Parajuli; Vijay A Ramchandani; Craig J McClain
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.826

5.  Magnesium intake is associated with a reduced risk of incident liver cancer, based on an analysis of the NIH-American Association of Retired Persons (NIH-AARP) Diet and Health Study prospective cohort.

Authors:  Shailja C Shah; Xiangzhu Zhu; Qi Dai; Richard M Peek; Martha J Shrubsole
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Dietary magnesium deficiency impaired intestinal structural integrity in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella).

Authors:  Shuo-Peng Wei; Wei-Dan Jiang; Pei Wu; Yang Liu; Yun-Yun Zeng; Jun Jiang; Sheng-Yao Kuang; Ling Tang; Yong-An Zhang; Xiao-Qiu Zhou; Lin Feng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Are Circulating Mg2+ Levels Associated with Glucose Tolerance Profiles and Incident Type 2 Diabetes?

Authors:  Rosangela Spiga; Gaia Chiara Mannino; Elettra Mancuso; Carolina Averta; Claudia Paone; Mariangela Rubino; Angela Sciacqua; Elena Succurro; Francesco Perticone; Francesco Andreozzi; Giorgio Sesti
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Total, Dietary, and Supplemental Magnesium Intakes and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Amir Bagheri; Sina Naghshi; Omid Sadeghi; Bagher Larijani; Ahmad Esmaillzadeh
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.701

9.  Magnesium accumulation upon cyclin M4 silencing activates microsomal triglyceride transfer protein improving NASH.

Authors:  Jorge Simón; Naroa Goikoetxea-Usandizaga; Marina Serrano-Maciá; David Fernández-Ramos; Diego Sáenz de Urturi; Jessica J Gruskos; Pablo Fernández-Tussy; Sofía Lachiondo-Ortega; Irene González-Recio; Rubén Rodríguez-Agudo; Virginia Gutiérrez-de-Juan; Begoña Rodríguez-Iruretagoyena; Marta Varela-Rey; Paula Gimenez-Mascarell; María Mercado-Gomez; Beatriz Gómez-Santos; Carmen Fernandez-Rodriguez; Fernando Lopitz-Otsoa; Maider Bizkarguenaga; Sibylle Dames; Ute Schaeper; Franz Martin; Guadalupe Sabio; Paula Iruzubieta; Javier Crespo; Patricia Aspichueta; Kevan H-Y Chu; Daniela Buccella; César Martín; Teresa Cardoso Delgado; Luis Alfonso Martínez-Cruz; María Luz Martínez-Chantar
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  Experimental rat model for acute tubular injury induced by high water hardness and high water fluoride: efficacy of primary preventive intervention by distilled water administration.

Authors:  Thanusha Perera; Shirani Ranasinghe; Neil Alles; Roshitha Waduge
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.