| Literature DB >> 29262602 |
Yuan Qin1,2, Guang Yang1, Meng Li1,2, Hui-Juan Liu2, Wei-Long Zhong1,2, Xue-Qin Yan1,2, Kai-Liang Qiao1,2, Jia-Huan Yang1,2, Deng-Hui Zhai1,2, Wei Yang2, Shuang Chen2, Hong-Gang Zhou1,2, Tao Sun1,2, Cheng Yang1,2.
Abstract
Artemisinin and its derivatives exhibit a high activity against a range of cancer cell types both in vitro and in vivo. In clinical practice, platinum-based anti-cancer chemotherapy is widely used to treat tumors. However, a large proportion of patients receiving these treatments will relapse because of metastasis and drug resistance. The purpose of this study is to explore the combinational anti-metastatic effect of platinum-based drugs and dihydroartemisinin (DHA). Both DDP and oxaliplatin (OXA) at low doses could induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in HCC. Meanwhile, co-administration of DHA could enhance DDP and OXA chemosensitivity in HCC and reverse drug resistance. DHA reversed the morphological changes induced by DDP or OXA and reversed the changes in EMT biomarkers induced by DDP and OXA in HCC in vitro and in vivo via AKT-Snail signaling. DHA significantly increased platinum-based drug sensitivity and suppressed EMT induced by platinum-based drugs via AKT-Snail signaling in HCC. DHA is expected to become the new adjuvant for chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Akt; EMT; Snail; dihydroartemisinin
Year: 2017 PMID: 29262602 PMCID: PMC5732768 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21793
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1DHA enhanced the effects of platinum-based drugs and reverse drug resistance in HCC
(A) Survival of SMMC-7721, HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells treated with the indicated amounts of DHA or platinum-based drugs or DHA combined with platinum-based drugs. (B) The expression of the proliferation marker in different groups. (C) The proportion of dead cells in different groups. (D) The proportion of nuclear fragmentation in different groups. (E) The relative IC50 value of DDP-resistant SMMC-7721, HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 for DDP and OXA with or without DHA. Data are presented as means of three experiments, and error bars represent standard deviation (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
Figure 2DHA inhibits migration and invasion induced by low dose DDP/OXA
(A) Typical images of cells in different groups using an optical microscope. (B) Typical images of cells in different groups using a scanning electron microscope. (C) Cell viability was inhibited after re-incubation in different groups for 48 h. (D) Transwell chambers were utilized for the invasion assay, and images were obtained at 200× magnification. Data are presented as the means of three experiments, and error bars represent standard deviation (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
Figure 3DHA reverses changes in EMT biomarkers and inhibits AKT/Snail pathway
(A) Protein expression level of E-cadherin and vimentin in HepG2 cells treated with different drugs. The GAPDH blot served as the loading control. (B) Typical images of immunofluorescent double staining for E-cadherin and vimentin in HepG2 cells treated with different drugs. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. The results are the means of the three experiments, and error bars represent the standard deviation. (C) Protein expression levels of AKT and P-AKT in HepG2 cells treated with different drugs. The GAPDH blot served as a loading control. (D) Dual-luciferase assay results of snail gene expression in HepG2 cells treated with different drugs. Data are presented as the means of three experiments, and error bars represent standard deviation (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01).
Figure 4DHA enhanced the anti-tumor effects of DDP and OXA in a mouse xenograft model
(A) Body weights (g) of animals with HepG2 xenografts. (B) Changes in the tumor volume of HepG2 xenografts. (C) Typical images of HepG2 xenografts. (D) Tumor weights (g) of animals with HepG2 xenografts. (E) The numbers of tumors that shifted to the lungs in different groups. (F) The median survival time of animals with HepG2 xenografts in different groups. Data are presented as the means of three experiments, and error bars represent standard deviation (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01).
Figure 5DHA alters EMT marker levels and inhibits the NF-κB/Snail pathway induced by DDP/OXA in cancer tissues
(A and C) Representative immunohistochemical staining of tumor samples showing E-cadherin and vimentin-positive staining. (B and D) Representative immunohistochemical staining of tumor samples showed AKT, P-AKT, and snail-positive staining. Data are presented as the means of three experiments, and error bars represent standard deviation (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
Figure 6Effects of DHA in cancer cells
(A) DHA affects biological processes in cancer cells. (B) A model showing the role of DHA in EMT induced by platinum drugs.