Literature DB >> 29260487

Bilingual Cancer Genetic Education Modules for the Deaf Community: Development and Evaluation of the Online Video Material.

Patrick Boudreault1,2, Alicia Wolfson3, Barbara Berman4, Vickie L Venne5, Janet S Sinsheimer6,7,8,9, Christina Palmer3,6,7,9.   

Abstract

Health information about inherited forms of cancer and the role of family history in cancer risk for the American Sign Language (ASL) Deaf community, a linguistic and cultural community, needs improvement. Cancer genetic education materials available in English print format are not accessible for many sign language users because English is not their native or primary language. Per Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, the level of literacy for printed health education materials should not be higher than 6th grade level (~ 11 to 12 years old), and even with this recommendation, printed materials are still not accessible to sign language users or other nonnative English speakers. Genetic counseling is becoming an integral part of healthcare, but often ASL users are not considered when health education materials are developed. As a result, there are few genetic counseling materials available in ASL. Online tools such as video and closed captioning offer opportunities for educators and genetic counselors to provide digital access to genetic information in ASL to the Deaf community. The Deaf Genetics Project team used a bilingual approach to develop a 37-min interactive Cancer Genetics Education Module (CGEM) video in ASL with closed captions and quizzes, and demonstrated that this approach resulted in greater cancer genetic knowledge and increased intentions to obtain counseling or testing, compared to standard English text information (Palmer et al., Disability and Health Journal, 10(1):23-32, 2017). Though visually enhanced educational materials have been developed for sign language users with multimodal/lingual approach, little is known about design features that can accommodate a diverse audience of sign language users so the material is engaging to a wide audience. The main objectives of this paper are to describe the development of the CGEM and to determine if viewer demographic characteristics are associated with two measurable aspects of CGEM viewing behavior: (1) length of time spent viewing and (2) number of pause, play, and seek events. These objectives are important to address, especially for Deaf individuals because the amount of simultaneous content (video, print) requires cross-modal cognitive processing of visual and textual materials. The use of technology and presentational strategies is needed that enhance and not interfere with health learning in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Sign Language; Cancer; Deaf; Education; Genetic counseling; Genetics; Hard of hearing; Health literacy; Online; Technology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29260487      PMCID: PMC5860968          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0188-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  15 in total

1.  The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National Norming and Performance Standards for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students.

Authors:  C B Traxler
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2000

2.  Challenges in language, culture, and modality: translating English measures into American sign language.

Authors:  Elaine G Jones; R Kevin Mallinson; Linda Phillips; Youngmi Kang
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Adapting health education material for deaf audiences.

Authors:  Robert Q Pollard; Robyn K Dean; Amanda O'Hearn; Sharon L Haynes
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2009-05

Review 4.  Online cancer communication: meeting the literacy, cultural and linguistic needs of diverse audiences.

Authors:  Linda Neuhauser; Gary L Kreps
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-06

5.  Assessing Health Literacy in Deaf American Sign Language Users.

Authors:  Michael M McKee; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Paul C Winters; Kevin Fiscella; Philip Zazove; Ananda Sen; Thomas Pearson
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015

6.  How many deaf people are there in the United States? Estimates from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.

Authors:  Ross E Mitchell
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2005-09-21

7.  Health websites: accessibility and usability for American sign language users.

Authors:  Poorna Kushalnagar; Joan Naturale; Raylene Paludneviciene; Scott R Smith; Emily Werfel; Richard Doolittle; Stephen Jacobs; James DeCaro
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2014-06-05

8.  Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.

Authors:  Nicholas McInnes; Bo J A Haglund
Journal:  Inform Health Soc Care       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.439

9.  Deaf epistemology: Deafhood and Deafness.

Authors:  Peter C Hauser; Amanda O'Hearn; Michael McKee; Anne Steider; Denise Thew
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  2010

10.  Deaf sign language users, health inequities, and public health: opportunity for social justice.

Authors:  Steven Barnett; Michael McKee; Scott R Smith; Thomas A Pearson
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genetic testing and eHealth usage among Deaf women.

Authors:  Poorna Kushalnagar; Juliana Holcomb; Georgia R Sadler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Introduction to the "Technology in Practice" Special Issue.

Authors:  Vickie Venne; Megan Doerr
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.