Literature DB >> 29260373

Minority Veterans Are More Willing to Participate in Complex Studies Compared to Non-minorities.

Leonardo Tamariz1,2, Irene Kirolos3, Fiorella Pendola3, Erin N Marcus3, Olveen Carrasquillo3, Jimmy Rivadeneira4, Ana Palacio3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minorities are an underrepresented population in clinical trials. A potential explanation for this underrepresentation could be lack of willingness to participate. The aim of our study was to evaluate willingness to participate in different hypothetical clinical research scenarios and to evaluate the role that predictors (e.g. health literacy) could have on the willingness of minorities to participate in clinical research studies.
METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study at the Miami VA Healthcare system and included primary care patients with hypertension. We measured willingness to participate as a survey of four clinical research scenarios that evaluated common study designs encountered in clinical research and that differed in degree of complexity. Our qualitative portion included comments about the scenarios.
RESULTS: We included 123 patients with hypertension in our study. Of the entire sample, ninety-three patients were minorities. Seventy per cent of the minorities were willing to participate, compared to 60 per cent of the non-minorities. The odds ratio (OR) of willingness to participate in simple studies was 0.58; 95 per cent CI 0.18-1.88 p=0.37 and the OR of willingness to participate in complex studies was 5.8; 95 per cent CI 1.10-1.31 p=0.03. In complex studies, minorities with low health literacy cited obtaining benefits (47 per cent) as the most common reason to be willing to participate. Minorities who were not willing to participate, cited fear of unintended outcomes as the main reason.
CONCLUSIONS: Minorities were more likely to be willing to participate in complex studies compared to non-minorities. Low health literacy and therapeutic misconception are important mediators when considering willingness to participate in clinical research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Health literacy; Minorities; Participation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29260373     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-017-9829-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  23 in total

Review 1.  Why ethnic minority groups are under-represented in clinical trials: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mahvash Hussain-Gambles; Karl Atkin; Brenda Leese
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2004-09

Review 2.  Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Tamariz; Ana Palacio; Mauricio Robert; Erin N Marcus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders.

Authors:  Sheba George; Nelida Duran; Keith Norris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Twenty-five years of therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 5.  Threats to applicability of randomised trials: exclusions and selective participation.

Authors:  A Britton; M McKee; N Black; K McPherson; C Sanderson; C Bain
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1999-04

6.  The use of claims data algorithms to recruit eligible participants into clinical trials.

Authors:  Leonardo Tamariz; Ana Palacio; Jennifer Denizard; Yvonne Schulman; Gabriel Contreras
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: why are patients not participating?

Authors:  Margaret M Byrne; Stacey L Tannenbaum; Stefan Glück; Judith Hurley; Michael Antoni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  Vivek H Murthy; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Health literacy, numeracy, and graphical literacy among veterans in primary care and their effect on shared decision making and trust in physicians.

Authors:  Vanessa Rodríguez; Allen D Andrade; Rocio García-Retamero; Ramanakumar Anam; Remberto Rodríguez; Miriam Lisigurski; Joseph Sharit; Jorge G Ruiz
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013

10.  Therapeutic Misconception in Psychiatry Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ivan Sk Thong; Meng Yee Foo; Min Yi Sum; Benjamin Capps; Tih-Shih Lee; Calvin Ho; Kang Sim
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.582

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Power of Knowledge, Responses to Change, and the Gymnastics of Causation.

Authors:  Michael A Ashby; Bronwen Morrell
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Potential research ethics violations against an indigenous tribe in Ecuador: a mixed methods approach.

Authors:  Esteban Ortiz-Prado; Katherine Simbaña-Rivera; Lenin Gómez-Barreno; Leonardo Tamariz; Alex Lister; Juan Carlos Baca; Alegria Norris; Lila Adana-Diaz
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.