Literature DB >> 29260268

Computation of the inverse additive relationship matrix for autopolyploid and multiple-ploidy populations.

Matthew G Hamilton1, Richard J Kerr2.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Rules to generate the inverse additive relationship matrix (A -1 ) are defined to enable the adoption restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) in autopolyploid populations with multiple ploidy levels. Many important agronomic, horticultural, ornamental, forestry, and aquaculture species are autopolyploids. However, the adoption of restricted maximum likelihood (REML), for estimating co/variance components, and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), for predicting breeding values, has been hampered in autopolyploid breeding by the absence of an appropriate means of generating the inverse additive relationship matrix (A -1 ). This paper defines rules to generate the A -1 of autopolyploid populations comprised of individuals of the same or different ploidy-levels, including populations exhibiting (1) odd-numbered ploidy levels (e.g. triploids), (2) sex-based differences in the probability that gametic genes are identical by descent and (3) somatic chromosome doubling. Inbreeding, due to double reduction, in autopolyploid founders in the absence of mating among relatives is also accounted for. A previously defined approach is modified, whereby rules are initially defined to build an inverse matrix of kinship coefficients (K -1 ), which is then used to generate A -1 . An R package (polyAinv; https://github.com/mghamilton/polyAinv ) to implement these rules has been developed and examples of analyses provided. The adoption of REML and BLUP methods made possible by these new rules has the potential to provide further insights into the quantitative genetic architecture of autopolyploid and multiple-ploidy populations, improve estimates of breeding values, and increase genetic gains made through recurrent selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29260268     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-017-3041-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  9 in total

Review 1.  Breaking down taxonomic barriers in polyploidy research.

Authors:  Barbara K Mable
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 2.  Use of the numerator relationship matrix in genetic analysis of autopolyploid species.

Authors:  Richard J Kerr; Li Li; Bruce Tier; Gregory W Dutkowski; Thomas A McRae
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding.

Authors:  Mariana Cansian Sattler; Carlos Roberto Carvalho; Wellington Ronildo Clarindo
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  AGHmatrix: R Package to Construct Relationship Matrices for Autotetraploid and Diploid Species: A Blueberry Example.

Authors:  Rodrigo R Amadeu; Catherine Cellon; James W Olmstead; Antonio A F Garcia; Marcio F R Resende; Patricio R Muñoz
Journal:  Plant Genome       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  QTL analysis in a complex autopolyploid: genetic control of sugar content in sugarcane.

Authors:  R Ming; S C Liu; P H Moore; J E Irvine; A H Paterson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  The Double-Reduction Landscape in Tetraploid Potato as Revealed by a High-Density Linkage Map.

Authors:  Peter M Bourke; Roeland E Voorrips; Richard G F Visser; Chris Maliepaard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Improving the analysis of low heritability complex traits for enhanced genetic gain in potato.

Authors:  Anthony T Slater; Graeme M Wilson; Noel O I Cogan; John W Forster; Benjamin J Hayes
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  A dense SNP-based linkage map for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) reveals extended chromosome homeologies and striking differences in sex-specific recombination patterns.

Authors:  Sigbjørn Lien; Lars Gidskehaug; Thomas Moen; Ben J Hayes; Paul R Berg; William S Davidson; Stig W Omholt; Matthew P Kent
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Genetic inactivation of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) eggs using UV-irradiation: observations and perspectives.

Authors:  Julie Colléter; David J Penman; Stéphane Lallement; Christian Fauvel; Tanja Hanebrekke; Renate D Osvik; Hans C Eilertsen; Helena D'Cotta; Béatrice Chatain; Stefano Peruzzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Predicting segregation of multiple fruit-quality traits by using accumulated phenotypic records in citrus breeding.

Authors:  Atsushi Imai; Takeshi Kuniga; Terutaka Yoshioka; Keisuke Nonaka; Nobuhito Mitani; Hiroshi Fukamachi; Naofumi Hiehata; Masashi Yamamoto; Takeshi Hayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Quantifying the Power and Precision of QTL Analysis in Autopolyploids Under Bivalent and Multivalent Genetic Models.

Authors:  Peter M Bourke; Christine A Hackett; Roeland E Voorrips; Richard G F Visser; Chris Maliepaard
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 3.  Tools for Genetic Studies in Experimental Populations of Polyploids.

Authors:  Peter M Bourke; Roeland E Voorrips; Richard G F Visser; Chris Maliepaard
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.753

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.