Literature DB >> 29259938

Knowledge Management Orientation: An Innovative Perspective to Hospital Management.

Matina Ghasemi1, Mazyar Ghadiri Nejad2, Kemal Bagzibagli3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: By considering innovation as a new project in hospitals, all the project management's standard steps should be followed in execution. This study investigated the validation of a new set of measures in terms of providing a procedure for knowledge management-oriented innovation that enriches the hospital management system.
METHODS: The relation between innovation and all the knowledge management areas, as the main constructs of project management, was illustrated by referring to project management standard steps and previous studies. Through consultations and meetings with a committee of professional project managers, a questionnaire was developed to measure ten knowledge management areas in hospital's innovation process. Additionally, a group of experts from hospital managers were invited to comment on the applicability of the questionnaires by considering if the items are measurable in hospitals practically.
RESULTS: A close-ended, Likert-type scale items, consisted of ten sections, were developed based on project management body of knowledge thorough Delphi technique. It enables the managers to evaluate hospitals' situation to be aware whether the organization follows the knowledge management standards in innovation process or not. By pilot study, confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were conducted to ensure the validity and reliability of the measurement items.
CONCLUSION: The developed items seem to have a potential to help hospital managers and subsequently delivering new products/services successfully based on the standard procedures in their organization. In all innovation processes, the knowledge management areas and their standard steps help hospital managers by a new tool as questionnaire format.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospital management; Innovation; Knowledge management area

Year:  2017        PMID: 29259938      PMCID: PMC5734963     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Public Health        ISSN: 2251-6085            Impact factor:   1.429


Introduction

Revolution in hospital management requires new procedures and a paradigm shift in today’s highly competitive world. Hospitals will be more successful by documenting any systematic and well-organized procedure. This concern is critical for hospital managers around the world without regard to nationality (1). Improvement in hospital management system is considered by emphasizing more on hospitals’ system (2) and consequently on successful hospital management and competitive strategies (3). The competitive strategy in hospital management has changed in different ways by focusing more on their managerial skills (4, 5) and necessity of professional project managers (Professional project managers in this study were certified from the Project Management Institute where is a US nonprofit professional organization for project management. (6). Hospitals always have challenges of both the external and internal environments (7). The only way for managers to overcome these challenges is improving their managerial skills (5, 8). For instance, one of the main challenges in hospitals is medical tourism. Patients travel to overseas destinations with the aim of receiving medical treatments (9). Medical tourism is a unique industry, which is a combination of both medical, and tourism industry in a specified location (10). This competitive area highlights the importance of being innovative and systematic in the quest of attracting more medical tourists (11). The hospitals, particularly as the main organization in this framework should follow some standard procedures that could bolster the competitiveness of the medical tourism market (12). The procedures, undertaken in any hospital, are critical for its competitiveness and performance (13). In previous studies in hospital management, just one or two knowledge management areas were considered like procurement management (14); cost management (15, 16) and communication management (17, 18). There is no study until yet which consider all ten knowledge management areas in a comprehensive analysis in hospitals; especially regard innovation processes. Innovation is a priority for managers in hospital management (19). Any new project has its procedures and standards to deliver the final product or service successfully. In project management, any new idea should follow standard steps in different categories. These categories are the ten knowledge management areas which are; integration, scope, time, cost, quality, human resource, communication, risk, procurement, and stakeholder management according to project management body of knowledge (PMBOK) (6). As stated earlier (20), projects are the lifeblood of every organization and project management is better, faster and cheaper way for success. By referring to scholars’ opinions, which hinted the relationship between each knowledge management area and innovation, the main purpose of current study is aware managers about the importance of professional analysis by using the developed items as a new tool in questionnaire format. Before, there were not any measurement items, which comprehensively measure new projects’ standard steps in hospitals (Table 1).
Table 1:

Project management processes

Knowledge Management AreasProject Management Process Groups
InitiatingPlanningExecutingMonitor and ControllingClosing
Integration ManagementDevelop Project CharterDevelop Project Management PlanDirect and Manage Project WorkMonitor and Control Project WorkPerform IntegratedChange ControlClose Project or Phase
Scope ManagementPlan Scope Management.Collect RequirementsDefine ScopeCreate WBSValidate ScopeControl Scope
Time ManagementPlan Schedule Management.Define ActivitiesSequence ActivitiesEstimate Activity ResourcesEstimate Activity DurationsDevelop ScheduleControl Schedule
Cost ManagementPlan Cost ManagementEstimate CostsDetermine BudgetControl Costs
Quality ManagementPlan Quality Management.Perform Quality AssuranceControl Quality
Human Resource ManagementPlan Human Resource ManagementAcquire Project TeamDevelop Project Team.Manage Project Team
Communication ManagementPlan Communications ManagementManage CommunicationControl Communications
Risk ManagementControl Risks
Plan Risk Management.Identify RisksPerform Qualitative RiskAnalysis Perform Quantitative RiskAnalysis Plan Risk Responses
Procurement ManagementPlan Procurement ManagementConduct ProcurementsControl ProcurementsClose Procurement
Stakeholder ManagementIdentify StakeholdersPlan Stakeholder ManagementManage Stakeholder EngagementControl Stakeholder Engagement

Methods

Project management in hospitals is an area that has not yet been fully explored in innovation processes. A qualitative research method was adopted in this study to illustrate the importance of knowledge management areas and innovation by delivering a new tool for these main constructs’ measurement. The development and validation of the measure items occurred in the following sections:

The standard steps of PMBOK

According to PMBOK (6) as any novel idea is performing for the first time, should be defined as a new project. In the current study, any innovation in hospitals is considered as a new project too. According to this standard, projects firstly need to be undertaken by all ten knowledge management areas to be successful in execution (Table 1). Project management processes

Delphi technique

By applying Delphi technique, a committee of eight professional project managers from Iran was asked to participate in developing the ten new close-ended, Likert-type scale questionnaires. All PMBOK standard procedures (Table 1) should be applied in any industry, but as all of them were converted to questionnaires format, then it was important to analyze it with the committee by the following question: 1) if the steps could be applied to hospitals? 2) if the steps need any changes according to the hospitals’ systems? The committee members carefully considered the suitability of the questionnaires, especially for hospital purposes, and were asked 3) whether different functional managers could answer them or not. Items identification and scale development are described in the results section. Using the items according to PMBOK, the committee drafted a preliminary version of the measurement items. The procedures and instructions pointed out by (21–23) which illustrated all the steps regarding how to develop questionnaires were considered in detail for the current study purpose. In the next step, to verify the clarity and applicability of the questionnaires, an expert review was conducted by the ten participating intending hospital managers after designing the questionnaires. The managers were selected regardless if they are from international or local hospitals. The expert review aimed to assess if the items in each measured item were relevant and whether the selected items adequately represented the ten knowledge management areas.

Results

The developed questions will help hospital managers to measure each knowledge management area for any novel idea, which will be called knowledge management- oriented innovation questionnaires. By using these questionnaires, managers will be sure about the innovation’s success in the hospitals. Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 =strongly agree) response categories were used for the following items which were drawn from Table 1. A pilot study was conducted on 40 questionnaires. Questions were answered by targeting participants from international hospitals’ general managers and functional managers like a quality manager, risk manager and human resource manager for example. Respondents were assured that there were no wrong or right answers to the items in the questionnaires. These items ( Appendix 1) were answered just by managerial levels as the items deal with professional analysis regard innovation. The language of the questionnaire is English, and official language in Iran is Persian then back translation has been performed for the current study. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were considered to ensure the reliability and validity of the measurement items (Appendix 1).

Discussion

This study seeks to expand our understanding of how the method of analyzing knowledge management areas could be helpful in the innovation process that improves hospital management processes. The result delivers a new tool in a questionnaire format that helps hospital managers to follow a standard procedure regarding innovation. The items have been used to measure the effect of knowledge management-oriented innovation.

Importance of knowledge management areas and innovation

Innovation is highly relevant in today’s’ competitive environment (24). Innovation could be defined as the only way to convert an opportunity to bring benefits earnable by an organization (25). The strategic approach of knowledge management is a key factor for innovation in both theory and practice (26). In a professional organization that is familiar with knowledge management, any novel idea that is implemented for the first time should be defined as a project because it is and requires all the standard steps of project management to deliver a successful new product or service (6). For using the standard steps of all knowledge management areas in innovation, it is necessary to demonstrate the relationship, separately as follow: Integration management and innovation (27, 28); Scope management and innovation (29); Time management and innovation (30); Cost management and innovation (31); Quality management and innovation (32); Human Resource management and innovation (33, 34); Communication management and innovation (35, 36); Risk management and innovation(37); Procurement management and innovation (38) and, Stakeholder management and innovation (39).

Hospital Management and Knowledge Management Areas

The importance of knowledge management areas in hospitals is pointed out by many scholars. For instance human resource management (40, 41); stakeholder management (42–44); procurement management (14); cost management (15, 16) and communication management (17, 18). Only some knowledge management areas were examined in hospitals management studies, which were designed to represent their importance like human resource management (40) and stakeholder management (42). A novel idea is not subjected to a comprehensive analysis (45) which increases the probability of these ideas’ failure. As processes are critical to the success of hospital systems (1), the current study will be helpful for hospital managers to deliver new products and services to patients.

Conclusion

Current study delivers a new measurement tool by emphasizing the importance of all the ten knowledge management areas in hospital management and by introducing them as the main categories in the innovation process. For future studies, researchers are suggested to determine which knowledge management area has more significant effect on innovation in hospitals by using a quantitative research approach. The lack of professional project managers in hospitals could be one of the main causes of failure of innovation. Therefore, a qualitative research approach could be conducted in hospitals on knowledge management areas regard innovation to discover the general knowledge of managers.

Ethical considerations

Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.
Integration Management-oriented Innovation
In our hospital, a charter is developed for each new idea to demonstrate all the details.
In our hospital, a plan is developed for each new idea.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea direct and manage the project.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea monitor and control the project.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea perform integrated change control.
In our hospital, each new idea will be closed and classified after being delivered.
Scope Management-oriented Innovation
In our hospital, managers for each new idea have a scope management plan.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea collect all the requirements.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea define the scope of the work.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea create a work breakdown structure.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea validate the scope of the work.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea control the scope of the work.
Time Management-oriented Innovation
In our hospital, managers for each new idea have a schedule management plan.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea define the activities.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea arrange the activities in sequence.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea estimate the activity resources.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea estimate the activity duration.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea develop a schedule.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea control the schedule.
Cost Management-oriented Innovation
In our hospital, managers for each new idea have a cost management plan.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea estimate the costs.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea determine the budget.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea control the related costs.
Quality Management-oriented Innovation
In our hospital, managers for each new idea have a quality management plan.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea perform quality assurance.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea control the quality.
Human Resource Management-oriented Innovation
In our hospital, managers for each new idea have a human resource management plan.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea acquire a project team.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea develop the project team.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea manage the project team.
Communication Management-oriented Innovation
In our hospital, managers for each new idea have a communication management plan.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea manage communication.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea control communication.
Risk Management-oriented Innovation
In our hospital, managers for each new idea have a risk management plan.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea identify the risks.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea perform a qualitative risk analysis.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea perform a quantitative risk analysis.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea have a risk response plan.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea control the risks.
Procurement Management-oriented Innovation
In our hospital, managers for each new idea have a procurement management plan.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea conduct the procurements by contracts.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea control all the procurement contracts.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea close all the procurement contracts.
Stakeholder Management-oriented Innovation
In our hospital, managers for each new idea identify all the stakeholders.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea have a stakeholder management plan.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea manage stakeholder engagement.
In our hospital, managers for each new idea control stakeholder engagement.
  14 in total

1.  Doctor in the process. The engagement of clinical directors in hospital management.

Authors:  D Buchanan; S Jordan; D Preston; A Smith
Journal:  J Manag Med       Date:  1997

2.  Hospital management training and improvement in managerial skills: Serbian experience.

Authors:  Zorica Terzic Supic; Vesna Bjegovic; Jelena Marinkovic; Milena Santric Milicevic; Vladimir Vasic
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Competitive strategy for successful hospital management.

Authors:  W O Cleverley; R K Harvey
Journal:  Hosp Health Serv Adm       Date:  1992

4.  The revolution in hospital management.

Authors:  John R Griffith; Kenneth R White
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2005 May-Jun

5.  Predicting the Incremental Hospital Cost of Adverse Events Among Medicare Beneficiaries in the Comprehensive Joint Replacement Program During Fiscal Year 2014.

Authors:  Steven D Culler; David S Jevsevar; Kevin J McGuire; Kevin G Shea; Kenneth M Little; Michael J Schlosser
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Hospital network performance: a survey of hospital stakeholders' perspectives.

Authors:  F Bravi; D Gibertoni; A Marcon; C Sicotte; E Minvielle; P Rucci; A Angelastro; T Carradori; M P Fantini
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  Medical tourism: A snapshot of evidence on treatment abroad.

Authors:  Neil Lunt; Daniel Horsfall; Johanna Hanefeld
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Human factors engineering: a tool for medical device evaluation in hospital procurement decision-making.

Authors:  Gill Ginsburg
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Hospital economics of the hospitalist.

Authors:  Douglas Gregory; Walter Baigelman; Ira B Wilson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Educating leaders in hospital management: a new model in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Sosena Kebede; Yigeremu Abebe; Mirkuzie Wolde; Biftu Bekele; Jeannie Mantopoulos; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.038

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fabrication of polyvinyl alcohol-graphene nanosheet nanocomposite loading of omega-3 fatty acids for ceramic engineering.

Authors:  Pegah Bitaraf; Azadeh Asefnejad; Nahid Hassanzadeh Nemati
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.532

2.  Therapy with new generation of biodegradable and bioconjugate 3D printed artificial gastrointestinal lumen.

Authors:  Matin Karbasian; Seyed Ali Eftekhari; Mohammad Karimzadeh Kolamroudi; Bahareh Kamyab Moghadas; Peiman Nasri; Amir Jasemi; Mahshid Telloo; Saeed Saber-Samandari; Amirsalar Khandan
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.699

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.