| Literature DB >> 29259024 |
Héctor Fernández-Susavila1, Ramón Iglesias-Rey1, Antonio Dopico-López1, María Pérez-Mato1, Tomás Sobrino1, José Castillo1, Francisco Campos2.
Abstract
Proper occlusion of the medial cerebral artery, as determined by laser Doppler monitoring, during cerebral ischaemia in rat models is an important inclusion criterion in experimental studies. However, successful occlusion of the artery does not always guarantee a reproducible infarct volume, which is crucial for validating the efficacy of new protective drugs. In a rat intraluminal ischaemic model, laser Doppler monitoring alone was compared with laser Doppler monitoring in combination with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Twenty-eight animals showed successful occlusion and reperfusion determined with Doppler monitoring, with an infarct size at 24 h of 16.7±11.5% (determined as ischaemic damage with respect to the ipsilateral hemisphere volume). However, when arterial occlusion and infarct damage were analysed in these animals using MRA and DWI, respectively, 15 animals were excluded and only 13 animals were included, with an infarct size at 24 h of 21.6±6.1%, showing a variability in the infarct size significantly lower (P<0.05, F-test) than that obtained with Doppler monitoring alone. We also observed that blocking of the pterygopalatine artery (a maxillary artery that is usually occluded in the intraluminal ischaemic model) was not relevant for this model, at least in terms of infarct variability. These results show that laser Doppler monitoring is a necessary procedure, but not sufficient to guarantee a reproducible infarct volume, in a rat ischaemic model. Therefore, laser Doppler monitoring in combination with DWI and MRA represents a reliable inclusion protocol during ischaemic surgery for the analysis of new protective drugs.Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; Cerebral ischaemia; Inclusion criteria; Laser Doppler; MR angiography; MRI
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29259024 PMCID: PMC5769604 DOI: 10.1242/dmm.029868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Model Mech ISSN: 1754-8403 Impact factor: 5.758
Fig. 1.Protocol diagram summarizing the number of animals included, with exclusions per group, for final analysis. Two experimental groups were compared: (A) animals evaluated with only laser Doppler monitoring; (B) animals evaluated with laser Doppler monitoring, MR angiography and DWI. The two groups were compared in animals with and without occlusion of the pterygopalatine artery. (C) Infarct volume determined 24 h after ischaemia for the two inclusion protocols used in rats with and without pterygopalatine artery occlusion. Data are expressed as mean±s.d. Student's t-test was used to compare the differences between the means, and F-test was used to compare differences in variability. Means were similar for both inclusion protocols, while the variability was significantly reduced with the new inclusion protocol suggested (*P<0.05).
Fig. 2.The main aspects of the angiography technique. (A) The cerebrovascular anatomy of the rat. (B) Coronal projection of a MR angiography image of a healthy rat. The ACA and MCA can be observed in the MR angiography projection (right) and in the axial image (middle). (C) Ischaemic animal with the MCA and the ACA occluded. (D) Ischaemic animal with only the MCA occluded. In the laser Doppler recording, animals with only the MCA occluded and animals with both the MCA and ACA occluded showed the same cerebral blood flow profile during arterial occlusion and reperfusion. ACA, anterior cerebral artery; ACAo, anterior cerebral artery occlusion; CCA, common carotid artery; CCAo, common carotid artery occlusion; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MCAo, middle cerebral artery occlusion; PT, pterygopalatine artery.
Fig. 3.Representative ADC maps (obtained from DWI) of animals included or excluded in the study. (A) ADC maps of an animal excluded owing to a baseline lesion volume <25% of the ipsilateral hemisphere. DWI results, from which the ADC maps were obtained, are shown above. (B) ADC maps of an included animal with a baseline lesion volume within the accepted range (25-45% of the ipsilateral hemisphere). (C) ADC maps of an animal excluded owing to a baseline lesion volume >45% of the ipsilateral hemisphere. In the laser Doppler recording (below), animals with different DWI volumes presented the same cerebral blood flow profile during arterial occlusion and reperfusion.
Results of a power analysis conducted to calculate required group sizes for detecting a significant reduction in lesion volume between a control group (standard or new protocol) and a treated group