BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The goal of the Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) meetings is to advance the development of stroke therapies. At STAIR VIII, consensus recommendations were developed for clinical trial strategies to demonstrate the benefit of endovascular reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Prospects for success with forthcoming endovascular trials are robust, because new neurothrombectomy devices have superior reperfusion efficacy compared with earlier-generation interventions. Specific recommendations are provided for trial designs in 3 populations: (1) patients undergoing intravenous fibrinolysis, (2) early patients ineligible for or having failed intravenous fibrinolysis, and (3) wake-up and other late-presenting patients. Among intravenous fibrinolysis-eligible patients, key principles are that CT or MRI confirmation of target arterial occlusions should precede randomization; endovascular intervention should be pursued with the greatest rapidity possible; and combined intravenous and neurothrombectomy therapy is more promising than neurothrombectomy alone. Among patients ineligible for or having failed intravenous fibrinolysis, scientific equipoise was affirmed and the need to randomize all eligible patients emphasized. Vessel imaging to confirm occlusion is mandatory, and infarct core and penumbral imaging is desirable in later time windows. Additional STAIR VIII recommendations include approaches to test multiple devices in a single trial, utility weighting of disability end points, and adaptive designs to delineate time and tissue injury thresholds at which benefits from intervention no longer accrue. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular research priorities in acute ischemic stroke are to perform trials testing new, highly effective neuro thrombectomy devices rapidly deployed in patients confirmed to have target vessel occlusions.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The goal of the Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) meetings is to advance the development of stroke therapies. At STAIR VIII, consensus recommendations were developed for clinical trial strategies to demonstrate the benefit of endovascular reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Prospects for success with forthcoming endovascular trials are robust, because new neurothrombectomy devices have superior reperfusion efficacy compared with earlier-generation interventions. Specific recommendations are provided for trial designs in 3 populations: (1) patients undergoing intravenous fibrinolysis, (2) early patients ineligible for or having failed intravenous fibrinolysis, and (3) wake-up and other late-presenting patients. Among intravenous fibrinolysis-eligible patients, key principles are that CT or MRI confirmation of target arterial occlusions should precede randomization; endovascular intervention should be pursued with the greatest rapidity possible; and combined intravenous and neurothrombectomy therapy is more promising than neurothrombectomy alone. Among patients ineligible for or having failed intravenous fibrinolysis, scientific equipoise was affirmed and the need to randomize all eligible patients emphasized. Vessel imaging to confirm occlusion is mandatory, and infarct core and penumbral imaging is desirable in later time windows. Additional STAIR VIII recommendations include approaches to test multiple devices in a single trial, utility weighting of disability end points, and adaptive designs to delineate time and tissue injury thresholds at which benefits from intervention no longer accrue. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular research priorities in acute ischemic stroke are to perform trials testing new, highly effective neuro thrombectomy devices rapidly deployed in patients confirmed to have target vessel occlusions.
Authors: Scott E Kasner; Jill M Baren; Peter D Le Roux; Pamela G Nathanson; Katherine Lamond; Stacy L Rosenberg; Jason Karlawish Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2010-09-27 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Oliver Rivero-Arias; Melissa Ouellet; Alastair Gray; Jane Wolstenholme; Peter M Rothwell; Ramon Luengo-Fernandez Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Shahmir Kamalian; Shervin Kamalian; Matthew B Maas; Greg V Goldmacher; Seyedmehdi Payabvash; Adnan Akbar; Pamela W Schaefer; Karen L Furie; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Michael H Lev Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mouhammad A Jumaa; Fan Zhang; Gerardo Ruiz-Ares; Theresa Gelzinis; Amer M Malik; Aitziber Aleu; Jennifer I Oakley; Brian Jankowitz; Ridwan Lin; Vivek Reddy; Syed F Zaidi; Maxim D Hammer; Lawrence R Wechsler; Michael Horowitz; Tudor G Jovin Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Alex Abou-Chebl; Ridwan Lin; Muhammad Shazam Hussain; Tudor G Jovin; Elad I Levy; David S Liebeskind; Albert J Yoo; Daniel P Hsu; Marilyn M Rymer; Ashis H Tayal; Osama O Zaidat; Sabareesh K Natarajan; Raul G Nogueira; Ashish Nanda; Melissa Tian; Qing Hao; Junaid S Kalia; Thanh N Nguyen; Michael Chen; Rishi Gupta Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Christian H Riedel; Philip Zimmermann; Ulf Jensen-Kondering; Robert Stingele; Günther Deuschl; Olav Jansen Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Héctor Fernández-Susavila; Ramón Iglesias-Rey; Antonio Dopico-López; María Pérez-Mato; Tomás Sobrino; José Castillo; Francisco Campos Journal: Dis Model Mech Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 5.758
Authors: Yuta Kasagi; Prasanna M Chandramouleeswaran; Kelly A Whelan; Koji Tanaka; Veronique Giroux; Medha Sharma; Joshua Wang; Alain J Benitez; Maureen DeMarshall; John W Tobias; Kathryn E Hamilton; Gary W Falk; Jonathan M Spergel; Andres J Klein-Szanto; Anil K Rustgi; Amanda B Muir; Hiroshi Nakagawa Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-01-03