BACKGROUND: To examine short-term and midterm outcomes after the David and Bentall procedures in patients with an acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2017, patients (n = 135) with acute type A aortic dissection underwent an aortic root replacement with either the David (n = 40) or Bentall (n = 95) procedure. Perioperative outcome, reoperation rate, aortic valve function, and long-term survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The median age of the entire cohort was 56 years. Rates of malperfusion (21%), shock (16%), history of renal failure (4%), and extent of surgery were similar between David and Bentall groups. However, the David group was significantly younger (45 versus 61 years) with less hypertension (45% versus 66%), coronary artery disease (0% versus 17%), valvulopathy (5% versus 19%), and prior cardiac surgery (5% versus 21%). Overall operative mortality was 9.6% (David 3% and Bentall 13%). Composite outcome comprising myocardial infarction, stroke, new-onset renal failure, and operative mortality was 18% in the entire cohort (David 5% and Bentall 23%). In the David group, the freedom of moderate aortic insufficiency was 95% at 10 years. The rate of reoperation for pathology of the proximal aorta or aortic valve was 0% and 2% for the David and Bentall groups, respectively. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 66% (95% confidence interval: 51% to 77%) for the entire cohort, with 98% (95% confidence interval: 84% to 99%) survival in the David group and 57% (95% confidence interval: 42% to 70%) survival in the Bentall group. CONCLUSIONS: Both the David and Bentall procedures are appropriate surgical approaches for aortic root replacement in select patients with an acute type A aortic dissection.
BACKGROUND: To examine short-term and midterm outcomes after the David and Bentall procedures in patients with an acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2017, patients (n = 135) with acute type A aortic dissection underwent an aortic root replacement with either the David (n = 40) or Bentall (n = 95) procedure. Perioperative outcome, reoperation rate, aortic valve function, and long-term survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The median age of the entire cohort was 56 years. Rates of malperfusion (21%), shock (16%), history of renal failure (4%), and extent of surgery were similar between David and Bentall groups. However, the David group was significantly younger (45 versus 61 years) with less hypertension (45% versus 66%), coronary artery disease (0% versus 17%), valvulopathy (5% versus 19%), and prior cardiac surgery (5% versus 21%). Overall operative mortality was 9.6% (David 3% and Bentall 13%). Composite outcome comprising myocardial infarction, stroke, new-onset renal failure, and operative mortality was 18% in the entire cohort (David 5% and Bentall 23%). In the David group, the freedom of moderate aortic insufficiency was 95% at 10 years. The rate of reoperation for pathology of the proximal aorta or aortic valve was 0% and 2% for the David and Bentall groups, respectively. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 66% (95% confidence interval: 51% to 77%) for the entire cohort, with 98% (95% confidence interval: 84% to 99%) survival in the David group and 57% (95% confidence interval: 42% to 70%) survival in the Bentall group. CONCLUSIONS: Both the David and Bentall procedures are appropriate surgical approaches for aortic root replacement in select patients with an acute type A aortic dissection.
Authors: Bo Yang; Elizabeth L Norton; Reilly Hobbs; Linda Farhat; Xiaoting Wu; Whitney E Hornsby; Karen M Kim; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Elizabeth L Norton; Carlo Maria Rosati; Karen M Kim; Xiaoting Wu; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb; Bo Yang Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2019-08-25 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Salome Weiss; Indrani Sen; Ying Huang; Jill M Killian; W Scott Harmsen; Jay Mandrekar; Alanna M Chamberlain; Philip P Goodney; Veronique L Roger; Randall R DeMartino Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Elizabeth L Norton; Xiaoting Wu; Karen M Kim; Shinichi Fukuhara; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb; Bo Yang Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Elizabeth L Norton; Karen M Kim; Shinichi Fukuhara; Xiaoting Wu; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb; Bo Yang Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 6.439
Authors: Hug Aubin; Payam Akhyari; Philipp Rellecke; Christina Pawlitza; George Petrov; Artur Lichtenberg; Hiroyuki Kamiya Journal: Front Surg Date: 2019-08-06
Authors: Elizabeth L Norton; Linda Farhat; Xiaoting Wu; Karen M Kim; Shinichi Fukuhara; Minhaj S Khaja; David M Williams; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb; Bo Yang Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2020-06-20 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: J Scott Rankin; Domenico Mazzitelli; Theodor J M Fischlein; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Diana Aicher; Lawrence M Wei; Vinay Badhwar Journal: JTCVS Tech Date: 2020-01-23
Authors: Lauren V Huckaby; Ibrahim Sultan; Santi Trimarchi; Bradley Leshnower; Edward P Chen; Derek R Brinster; Truls Myrmel; Anthony L Estrera; Daniel G Montgomery; Amit Korach; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Joseph S Coselli; Takeyoshi Ota; Clayton A Kaiser; Kim A Eagle; Himanshu J Patel; Thomas G Gleason Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 5.102