| Literature DB >> 29258225 |
Julian Daniel Schwab1,2, Lea Siegle3,4, Silke Daniela Kühlwein5,6, Michael Kühl7, Hans Armin Kestler8.
Abstract
Biological pathways are thought to be robust against a variety of internal and external perturbations. Fail-safe mechanisms allow for compensation of perturbations to maintain the characteristic function of a pathway. Pathways can undergo changes during aging, which may lead to changes in their stability. Less stable or less robust pathways may be consequential to or increase the susceptibility of the development of diseases. Among others, NF- κ B signaling is a crucial pathway in the process of aging. The NF- κ B system is involved in the immune response and dealing with various internal and external stresses. Boolean networks as models of biological pathways allow for simulation of signaling behavior. They can help to identify which proposed mechanisms are biologically representative and which ones function but do not mirror physical processes-for instance, changes of signaling pathways during the aging process. Boolean networks can be inferred from time-series of gene expression data. This allows us to get insights into the changes of behavior of pathways such as NF- κ B signaling in aged organisms in comparison to young ones.Entities:
Keywords: Boolean networks; aging; reconstruction; stability
Year: 2017 PMID: 29258225 PMCID: PMC5745451 DOI: 10.3390/biology6040046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Schematic representation of a Boolean network approach to investigate stability changes in aging signaling networks. First, the time-series data is binarized and reduced using the BASC A algorithm of the R-package BiTrinA [20]. The resulting time-series data is split into two age groups (young (n = 7) and aged (n = 8)) and used to infer Boolean networks using the R-package BoolNet [21]. In the next step, the stability of the resulting Boolean networks is investigated by perturbation experiments. The best-fit algorithm can return a number of different Boolean functions for each gene in the network. From these possible functions 1000 synchronous Boolean networks are created for each age group by randomly drawing one of the inferred Boolean functions for each gene. Next, randomly generated states () are perturbed using bitflips (). The normalized Hamming distance () of the successor states and and and of and is computed. This is repeated for 1000 random states, the successor states of 1000 random states and random attractor state following 1000 random states with random bitflips. Finally, the mean normalized Hamming distance of these 3000 tests for each of the 1000 networks of each phenotype is compared.
Figure 2Network wiring of reconstructed Boolean networks, showing one of the possible combinations of the reconstructed functions which were drawn. (A) shows a network representing the young phenotype and (B) the aged phenotype.
Figure 3(A) shows the mean of the number of inputs of all Boolean functions of the young and aged phenotype Boolean networks as a bar plot. The standard deviations are included as error bars. (B) The boxplot shows the average, normalized Hamming distance between the successor states and of 1000 random states, the successor states of 1000 random states, attractor states following on 1000 random states and their perturbed versions for 1000 random combinations of inferred Boolean functions of the young and aged phenotype (Wilcoxon rank sum test for all robustness comparisons).
Overview over the measured normalized Hamming distances of the young and aged phenotypes starting from random initial states, random successor states and random attractor states compared to perturbed networks after one and after five state transitions.
| After One State Transition | After Five State Transitions | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young Phenotype | Aged Phenotype | Young Phenotype | Aged Phenotype | |||||||||
| Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | |
| random initial state | 0.041 | 0.056 | 0.048 | 0.044 | 0.065 | 0.053 | 0.028 | 0.151 | 0.063 | 0.040 | 0.201 | 0.085 |
| random successor state | 0.041 | 0.057 | 0.048 | 0.045 | 0.067 | 0.055 | 0.027 | 0.143 | 0.064 | 0.034 | 0.209 | 0.087 |
| random attractor state | 0.036 | 0.057 | 0.047 | 0.037 | 0.064 | 0.054 | 0.004 | 0.144 | 0.060 | 0.007 | 0.211 | 0.083 |
Figure 4Schematic representation of one gene in the gene expression data (NCBI GEO ID GSE362). In the experiments muscle samples from 15 healthy humans of different age (21–75) were taken. The samples were arranged in ascending order by age to form a time-series. Samples of all humans between 21–27 years represent the young phenotype. The samples of all humans between 67–75 years represent the aged phenotype.