Durie Suh1, Dagmar I Keller2, Danielle Hof3, Arnold von Eckardstein1, Joanna Gawinecka1. 1. Institute for Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 2. Emergency Department, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Unilabs, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Point of care (POC) assays for cardiac troponins I or T (cTnI or cTnT) may accelerate the diagnosis of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, their clinical utility according to the 0 h/3 h algorithm recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is unknown. METHODS: Blood samples from 90 patients with suspected ACS were obtained at hospital admission and 3 h later. Concentrations of cTn were determined using five POC assays (AQT90 FLEX cTnI and cTnT; PATHFAST™ cTnI; Stratus CS 200 cTnI; and Triage MeterPro cTnI) and two guideline-acceptable high-sensitivity (hs) immunoassays. RESULTS: For the diagnosis of NSTEMI (n=15), AUCs for Abbott hs-cTnI and Roche hs-cTnT were 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.96] and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.95), respectively, at admission, and 0.96 and 0.94, respectively, 3 h later. With the 99th percentile cutoff, their sensitivities were 62% and 92%, respectively, at admission, and 77% and 100%, respectively, 3 h later. The PATHFAST™ cTnI assay showed AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-1.00), respectively, and sensitivities of 67% and 75% at admission and 3 h later, respectively. The other cTn POC assays had AUCs of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.53-0.89) to 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71-0.96) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-0.99) to 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75-0.99) and sensitivities of 39%-50% and 62%-77% at admission and 3 h later, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PATHFAST™ cTnI assay proved itself as comparable to ESC-guideline acceptable hs-cTn assays. The lower sensitivity of the other POC assays limits their clinical utility and would require longer follow-up monitoring of patients for the safe NSTEMI rule-out.
BACKGROUND: Point of care (POC) assays for cardiac troponins I or T (cTnI or cTnT) may accelerate the diagnosis of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, their clinical utility according to the 0 h/3 h algorithm recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is unknown. METHODS: Blood samples from 90 patients with suspected ACS were obtained at hospital admission and 3 h later. Concentrations of cTn were determined using five POC assays (AQT90 FLEX cTnI and cTnT; PATHFAST™ cTnI; Stratus CS 200 cTnI; and Triage MeterPro cTnI) and two guideline-acceptable high-sensitivity (hs) immunoassays. RESULTS: For the diagnosis of NSTEMI (n=15), AUCs for Abbott hs-cTnI and Roche hs-cTnT were 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.96] and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.95), respectively, at admission, and 0.96 and 0.94, respectively, 3 h later. With the 99th percentile cutoff, their sensitivities were 62% and 92%, respectively, at admission, and 77% and 100%, respectively, 3 h later. The PATHFAST™ cTnI assay showed AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-1.00), respectively, and sensitivities of 67% and 75% at admission and 3 h later, respectively. The other cTn POC assays had AUCs of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.53-0.89) to 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71-0.96) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-0.99) to 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75-0.99) and sensitivities of 39%-50% and 62%-77% at admission and 3 h later, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PATHFAST™ cTnI assay proved itself as comparable to ESC-guideline acceptable hs-cTn assays. The lower sensitivity of the other POC assays limits their clinical utility and would require longer follow-up monitoring of patients for the safe NSTEMI rule-out.
Entities:
Keywords:
acute myocardial infarction; point of care (POC) troponin
Authors: Anja Forrer; Felix Schoenrath; Michael Torzewski; Jens Schmid; Urlich F W Franke; Nora Göbel; Drahomir Aujesky; Christian M Matter; Thomas F Lüscher; Francois Mach; David Nanchen; Nicolas Rodondi; Volkmar Falk; Arnold von Eckardstein; Joanna Gawinecka Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-03-30