Literature DB >> 29256998

Is There a Limit? A Risk Assessment Model of Liposuction and Lipoaspirate Volume on Complications in Abdominoplasty.

Brittany L Vieira1,2, Ian Chow1,2, Sammy Sinno1,2, Robert G Dorfman1,2, Philip Hanwright1,2, Karol A Gutowski1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combining liposuction and abdominoplasty is controversial because of concerns for increased complications and potential for vascular compromise of the abdominoplasty flap. Also, the lipoaspirate volume in abdominoplasty is regulated in some areas to as little as 500 ml when performed with abdominoplasty. This study measures abdominoplasty complication rates when performed with and without trunk liposuction, and evaluates the effect of lipoaspirate volume on complications.
METHODS: Abdominoplasty and liposuction of the trunk procedures were identified in the Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons database. Multivariate regression models determined the effect of liposuction with abdominoplasty on complications compared with abdominoplasty alone and determined the effect of liposuction volume on complications.
RESULTS: Eleven thousand one hundred ninety-one patients were identified: 9638 (86.1 percent) having abdominoplasty with truncal liposuction and 1553 (13.9 percent) having abdominoplasty alone. Overall complication rates were 10.5 percent and 13.0 percent, respectively. Combined liposuction and abdominoplasty was independently associated with a reduced risk of both overall complications (p = 0.046) and seroma (p = 0.030). Given existing laws limiting liposuction volume to 500 or 1000 ml in combination with abdominoplasty, each of these thresholds was evaluated, with no effect on complications. Surprisingly, increasing liposuction volume was not independently associated with an increased risk of any complication.
CONCLUSIONS: When done by board-certified plastic surgeons, abdominoplasty with truncal liposuction is safe, with fewer complications than abdominoplasty alone. Regulations governing liposuction volumes in abdominoplasty are arbitrary and do not reflect valid thresholds for increased complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29256998     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  A Comparison of Common Plastic Surgery Operations Using the NSQIP and TOPS Databases.

Authors:  Jacob Veith; Willem Collier; Andrew Simpson; David Magno-Padron; Bruce Mast; Robert X Murphy; Jayant Agarwal; Alvin Kwok
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-27

Review 2.  Abdominoplasty: Pitfalls and Prospects.

Authors:  Nayef A Louri; Hamad M Ammar; Fatema Abduljabbar Abdulkariml; Turki Abdulla Sanad Ahmed Eid Alkhaldi; Rashed Noaman AlHasan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  The Global Prevalence of Seroma After Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nader Salari; Behnaz Fatahi; Yalda Bartina; Mohsen Kazeminia; Mohammadbagher Heydari; Masoud Mohammadi; Mahvan Hemmati; Shamarina Shohaimi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Improving Abdominal Plastic Scars with a Dietary Supplement-A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Mathieu Haiun; Hersant Barbara; Adrien Durazzo; Mounia Sid-Ahmed-Mezi; Jean-Paul Meningaud
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-10-04

Review 5.  Standards and Trends in Lipoabdominoplasty.

Authors:  Neil O'Kelly; Khang Nguyen; Alexander Gibstein; James P Bradley; Neil Tanna; Alan Matarasso
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-26

6.  A New Surgical Approach to Body Contouring.

Authors:  Emmanuel Armando Flores González; Francisco Pérez Chávez; Oliver René Ramírez Guerrero; Noé Isaías Gracida Mancilla; Raquel Aracely Vázquez Apodaca
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-05-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.