Maria E Garcia1, Lisa Ochoa-Frongia2, Nathalie Moise3, Adrian Aguilera4,5, Alicia Fernandez2. 1. Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. maria.garcia@ucsf.edu. 2. Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. 5. Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) have high rates of depression, yet face challenges accessing effective care in outpatient settings. We undertook a systematic review to investigate the effectiveness of the collaborative care model for depression for LEP patients in primary care. METHODS: We queried online PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE databases (January 1, 2000, to June 10, 2017) for quantitative studies comparing collaborative care to usual care to treat depression in adults with LEP in primary care. We evaluated the impact of collaborative care on depressive symptoms or on depression treatment. Two reviewers independently extracted key data from the studies and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane bias and quality assessment tool (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (non-RCTs). RESULTS: Of 86 titles identified, 15 were included (representing 9 studies: 5 RCTs, 3 cohort studies, and 1 case-control study). Studies included 4859 participants; 2679 (55%) reported LEP. The majority spoke Spanish (93%). The wide variability in study design and outcome definitions precluded performing a meta-analysis. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 2 years. Three of four high-quality RCTs reported that 13-25% more patients had improved depressive symptoms when treated with culturally tailored collaborative care compared to usual care; the last had high treatment in the control arm and found equal improvement. Two non-RCT studies suggest that Spanish-speaking patients may benefit as much as, if not more than, English-speaking patients treated with collaborative care. The remaining studies reported increased receipt of preferred depression treatment (therapy vs. antidepressants) in the intervention groups. Eight of nine studies used bilingual providers to deliver the intervention. DISCUSSION: While limited by the number and variability of studies, the available research suggests that collaborative care for depression delivered by bilingual providers may be more effective than usual care among patients with LEP. Implementation studies of collaborative care, particularly among Asian and non-Spanish-speakers, are needed.
BACKGROUND:Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) have high rates of depression, yet face challenges accessing effective care in outpatient settings. We undertook a systematic review to investigate the effectiveness of the collaborative care model for depression for LEP patients in primary care. METHODS: We queried online PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE databases (January 1, 2000, to June 10, 2017) for quantitative studies comparing collaborative care to usual care to treat depression in adults with LEP in primary care. We evaluated the impact of collaborative care on depressive symptoms or on depression treatment. Two reviewers independently extracted key data from the studies and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane bias and quality assessment tool (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (non-RCTs). RESULTS: Of 86 titles identified, 15 were included (representing 9 studies: 5 RCTs, 3 cohort studies, and 1 case-control study). Studies included 4859 participants; 2679 (55%) reported LEP. The majority spoke Spanish (93%). The wide variability in study design and outcome definitions precluded performing a meta-analysis. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 2 years. Three of four high-quality RCTs reported that 13-25% more patients had improved depressive symptoms when treated with culturally tailored collaborative care compared to usual care; the last had high treatment in the control arm and found equal improvement. Two non-RCT studies suggest that Spanish-speaking patients may benefit as much as, if not more than, English-speaking patients treated with collaborative care. The remaining studies reported increased receipt of preferred depression treatment (therapy vs. antidepressants) in the intervention groups. Eight of nine studies used bilingual providers to deliver the intervention. DISCUSSION: While limited by the number and variability of studies, the available research suggests that collaborative care for depression delivered by bilingual providers may be more effective than usual care among patients with LEP. Implementation studies of collaborative care, particularly among Asian and non-Spanish-speakers, are needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
collaborative care; depression; language barriers; limited English proficiency; systematic review
Authors: Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis; Jasper Nuyen; Corinne Stoop; Juliana Chan; Alan M Jacobson; Wayne Katon; Frank Snoek; Norman Sartorius Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Jane W Njeru; Ramona S DeJesus; Jennifer St Sauver; Lila J Rutten; Debra J Jacobson; Patrick Wilson; Mark L Wieland Journal: Int J Ment Health Syst Date: 2016-02-29
Authors: Olivia E Bogucki; Mark D Williams; Leif I Solberg; Rebecca C Rossom; Craig N Sawchuk Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Laura-Louise Arundell; Helen Greenwood; Helen Baldwin; Eleanor Kotas; Shubulade Smith; Kasia Trojanowska; Chris Cooper Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2020-05-26
Authors: Maria E Garcia; Ladson Hinton; John Neuhaus; Mitchell Feldman; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Leah S Karliner Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-08-01