Literature DB >> 29255986

The effect of electron competition on chromate reduction using methane as electron donor.

Pan-Long Lv1, Liang Zhong1, Qiu-Yi Dong1, Shi-Lei Yang1, Wei-Wei Shen1, Quan-Song Zhu1, Chun-Yu Lai2, An-Cheng Luo1,3,4, Youneng Tang5, He-Ping Zhao6,7,8.   

Abstract

We studied the effect of electron competition on chromate (Cr(VI)) reduction in a methane (CH4)-based membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR), since the reduction rate was usually limited by electron supply. A low surface loading of SO42- promoted Cr(VI) reduction. The Cr(VI) removal percentage increased from 60 to 70% when the SO42- loading increased from 0 to 4.7 mg SO42-/m2-d. After the SO42- loading decreased back to zero, the Cr(VI) removal further increased to 90%, suggesting that some sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) stayed in the reactor to reduce Cr(VI). However, a high surface loading of SO42- (26.6 mg SO42-/m2-d) significantly slowed down the Cr(VI) reduction to 40% removal, which was probably due to competition between Cr(VI) and SO42- reduction. Similarly, when 0.5 mg/L of Se(VI) was introduced into the MBfR, Cr(VI) removal percentage slightly decreased to 60% and then increased to 80% when input Se(VI) was removed again. The microbial community strongly depended on the loadings of Cr(VI) and SO42-. In the sulfate effect experiment, three genera were dominant. Based on the correlation between the abundances of the three genera and the loadings of Cr(VI) and SO42-, we conclude that Methylocystis, a type II methanotroph, reduced both Cr(VI) and sulfate, Meiothermus only reduced Cr(VI), and Ferruginibacter only reduced SO42-.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromate reduction; Electron competition; Methane; Microorganism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29255986     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0937-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  48 in total

1.  Purification to homogeneity and characterization of a novel Pseudomonas putida chromate reductase.

Authors:  C H Park; M Keyhan; B Wielinga; S Fendorf; A Matin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks.

Authors:  Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Reduction of Chromate by Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Its c(3) Cytochrome.

Authors:  D R Lovley; E J Phillips
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Removal of multiple electron acceptors by pilot-scale, two-stage membrane biofilm reactors.

Authors:  He-Ping Zhao; Aura Ontiveros-Valencia; Youneng Tang; Bi-O Kim; Steven Vanginkel; David Friese; Ryan Overstreet; Jennifer Smith; Patrick Evans; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown; Bruce Rittmann
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Enzymatic reduction of chromate: comparative studies using sulfate-reducing bacteria. Key role of polyheme cytochromes c and hydrogenases.

Authors:  C Michel; M Brugna; C Aubert; A Bernadac; M Bruschi
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Anaerobic co-reduction of chromate and nitrate by bacterial cultures of Staphylococcus epidermidis L-02.

Authors:  A Vatsouria; M Vainshtein; P Kuschk; A Wiessner; Kosolapov D; M Kaestner
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  A steady-state biofilm model for simultaneous reduction of nitrate and perchlorate, part 2: parameter optimization and results and discussion.

Authors:  Youneng Tang; Heping Zhao; Andrew K Marcus; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown; Bruce E Rittmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Selenate and Nitrate Bioreductions Using Methane as the Electron Donor in a Membrane Biofilm Reactor.

Authors:  Chun-Yu Lai; Li-Lian Wen; Ling-Dong Shi; Kan-Kan Zhao; Yi-Qi Wang; Xiaoe Yang; Bruce E Rittmann; Chen Zhou; Youneng Tang; Ping Zheng; He-Ping Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Reduction of chromate (CrO4(2-)) by an enrichment consortium and an isolate of marine sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  K H Cheung; Ji-Dong Gu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 10.  Anaerobic oxidation of methane: progress with an unknown process.

Authors:  Katrin Knittel; Antje Boetius
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.500

View more
  4 in total

1.  Biological perchlorate reduction: which electron donor we can choose?

Authors:  Li He; Yu Zhong; Fubing Yao; Fei Chen; Ting Xie; Bo Wu; Kunjie Hou; Dongbo Wang; Xiaoming Li; Qi Yang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Chemical-Assisted Microbially Mediated Chromium (Cr) (VI) Reduction Under the Influence of Various Electron Donors, Redox Mediators, and Other Additives: An Outlook on Enhanced Cr(VI) Removal.

Authors:  Zeeshanur Rahman; Lebin Thomas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 3.  Hydrogenotrophic Microbial Reduction of Oxyanions With the Membrane Biofilm Reactor.

Authors:  Chen Zhou; Aura Ontiveros-Valencia; Robert Nerenberg; Youneng Tang; David Friese; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown; Bruce E Rittmann
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Detoxification, Active Uptake, and Intracellular Accumulation of Chromium Species by a Methane-Oxidizing Bacterium.

Authors:  Salaheldeen Enbaia; Abdurrahman Eswayah; Nicole Hondow; Philip H E Gardiner; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.792

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.