Literature DB >> 24565802

Removal of multiple electron acceptors by pilot-scale, two-stage membrane biofilm reactors.

He-Ping Zhao1, Aura Ontiveros-Valencia2, Youneng Tang3, Bi-O Kim2, Steven Vanginkel4, David Friese5, Ryan Overstreet5, Jennifer Smith6, Patrick Evans6, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown2, Bruce Rittmann2.   

Abstract

We studied the performance of a pilot-scale membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR) treating groundwater containing four electron acceptors: nitrate (NO3(-)), perchlorate (ClO4(-)), sulfate (SO4(2-)), and oxygen (O2). The treatment goal was to remove ClO4(-) from ∼200 μg/L to less than 6 μg/L. The pilot system was operated as two MBfRs in series, and the positions of the lead and lag MBfRs were switched regularly. The lead MBfR removed at least 99% of the O2 and 63-88% of NO3(-), depending on loading conditions. The lag MBfR was where most of the ClO4(-) reduction occurred, and the effluent ClO4(-) concentration was driven to as low as 4 μg/L, with most concentrations ≤10 μg/L. However, SO4(2-) reduction occurred in the lag MBfR when its NO3(-) + O2 flux was smaller than ∼0.18 g H2/m(2)-d, and this was accompanied by a lower ClO4(-) flux. We were able to suppress SO4(2-) reduction by lowering the H2 pressure and increasing the NO3(-) + O2 flux. We also monitored the microbial community using the quantitative polymerase chain reaction targeting characteristic reductase genes. Due to regular position switching, the lead and lag MBfRs had similar microbial communities. Denitrifying bacteria dominated the biofilm when the NO3(-) + O2 fluxes were highest, but sulfate-reducing bacteria became more important when SO4(2-) reduction was enhanced in the lag MBfR due to low NO3(-) + O2 flux. The practical two-stage strategy to achieve complete ClO4(-) and NO3(-) reduction while suppressing SO4(2-) reduction involved controlling the NO3(-) + O2 surface loading between 0.18 and 0.34 g H2/m(2)-d and using a low H2 pressure in the lag MBfR.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydrogen; Microbial ecology; Nitrate; Perchlorate; Pilot membrane biofilm reactor; Sulfate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24565802     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  4 in total

1.  Biological perchlorate reduction: which electron donor we can choose?

Authors:  Li He; Yu Zhong; Fubing Yao; Fei Chen; Ting Xie; Bo Wu; Kunjie Hou; Dongbo Wang; Xiaoming Li; Qi Yang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The effect of electron competition on chromate reduction using methane as electron donor.

Authors:  Pan-Long Lv; Liang Zhong; Qiu-Yi Dong; Shi-Lei Yang; Wei-Wei Shen; Quan-Song Zhu; Chun-Yu Lai; An-Cheng Luo; Youneng Tang; He-Ping Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effects of salinity on simultaneous reduction of perchlorate and nitrate in a methane-based membrane biofilm reactor.

Authors:  Yin Zhang; Jia-Xian Chen; Li-Lian Wen; Youneng Tang; He-Ping Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Characteristics of denitrification and microbial community in respect to various H2 pressures and distances to the gas supply end in H2-based MBfR.

Authors:  Haixiang Li; Ruize Sun; Xuehong Zhang; Hua Lin; Yi Xie; Yu Han; Yongxing Pan; Dunqiu Wang; Kun Dong
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.064

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.