Literature DB >> 29255732

A Propensity-Matched Analysis Between Standard Versus Tapered Oral Vancomycin Courses for the Management of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.

Chris A Gentry1, Stephanie E Giancola1, Sharanjeet Thind2, George Kurdgelashvili2, Grant H Skrepnek3, Riley J Williams1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes of oral vancomycin courses without taper versus oral vancomycin courses with taper for treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).
METHODS: This investigation was a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis study using a Veterans Health Administration national clinical administrative database. Adult patients who were treated for recurrent CDI from any Veterans Affairs Medical Center between June 1, 2011 and October 31, 2016 were included if they were treated with oral vancomycin with or without a tapering regimen. The 2 groups were matched by next-nearest approach from a propensity score formula derived from independent variables associated with the selection of a taper regimen.
RESULTS: Propensity score matching resulted in 2 well-matched groups consisting of 226 episodes of patients treated with a vancomycin taper regimen and 678 episodes treated by vancomycin regimen without taper. No difference was found for the primary outcome of 180-day recurrence (59 of 226 [26.1%] for taper regimens versus 161 of 678 [23.8%], P = .48). A secondary outcome of 90-day all-cause mortality met statistical significance, favoring a taper regimen (5.31% vs 9.29%, P = .049); however, secondary outcomes of 90-day recurrence and 180-day all-cause mortality were not different.
CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin taper regimens did not provide benefit over vancomycin regimens without taper in preventing additional CDI recurrence in patients with first or second recurrent episodes in this propensity score-matched analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; recurrence; vancomycin taper

Year:  2017        PMID: 29255732      PMCID: PMC5729658          DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofx235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis        ISSN: 2328-8957            Impact factor:   3.835


  18 in total

Review 1.  The role played by contaminated surfaces in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens.

Authors:  Jonathan A Otter; Saber Yezli; Gary L French
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States.

Authors:  Fernanda C Lessa; Lisa G Winston; L Clifford McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  J Freeman; M P Bauer; S D Baines; J Corver; W N Fawley; B Goorhuis; E J Kuijper; M H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults.

Authors:  Richard L Nelson; Katie J Suda; Charlesnika T Evans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-03

5.  Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores.

Authors:  Melissa M Garrido; Amy S Kelley; Julia Paris; Katherine Roza; Diane E Meier; R Sean Morrison; Melissa D Aldridge
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Comparison of Clostridium difficile isolates from individuals with recurrent and single episode of infection.

Authors:  Connor Richardson; Peter Kim; Christine Lee; Alexa Bersenas; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.331

7.  Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis due to toxin-producing clostridia.

Authors:  J G Bartlett; T W Chang; M Gurwith; S L Gorbach; A B Onderdonk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Breaking the cycle: treatment strategies for 163 cases of recurrent Clostridium difficile disease.

Authors:  Lynne V McFarland; Gary W Elmer; Christina M Surawicz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection: meta-analysis of pivotal randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Derrick W Crook; A Sarah Walker; Yin Kean; Karl Weiss; Oliver A Cornely; Mark A Miller; Roberto Esposito; Thomas J Louie; Nicole E Stoesser; Bernadette C Young; Brian J Angus; Sherwood L Gorbach; Timothy E A Peto
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996-2003.

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; Maria Owings; Daniel B Jernigan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index.

Authors:  Joshua D Mitchell; Brian F Gage; Nicole Fergestrom; Eric Novak; Todd C Villines
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Economic evaluation of Faecal microbiota transplantation compared to antibiotics for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection.

Authors:  Zainab I Abdali; Tracy E Roberts; Pelham Barton; Peter M Hawkey
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-06-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.