| Literature DB >> 29255616 |
Paul Nkemtendong Tolefac1,2, Gregory Edie Halle-Ekane2,3, Valirie Ndip Agbor4, Carlson Barbila Sama5, Calypse Ngwasiri6, Pierre Marie Tebeu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early initiation of antenatal care visits is an essential component of services to improving maternal and new born health. The Cameroonian Demographic and Health Survey conducted in 2011 indicated that only 34% of pregnant women start antenatal care in the first trimester. However, detailed study to identify factors associated with late initiation of care has not been conducted in Cameroon. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of late booking first ANC visit amongst attendance of first ANC and the determinants of late first ANC in Douala general hospital.Entities:
Keywords: Antenatal care; Booking; Determinants; Late ANC
Year: 2017 PMID: 29255616 PMCID: PMC5727881 DOI: 10.1186/s40748-017-0067-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol ISSN: 2054-958X
Fig. 1Flow chart showing recruitment of participants
Baseline characteristics of the study population
| Category | Characteristics | Frequency ( | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age distribution | 16–25 | 83 | 28.3 |
| 26–35 | 180 | 61.4 | |
| 36–45 | 30 | 10.3 | |
| Marital status | Married | 114 | 38.9 |
| Single | 179 | 61.1 | |
| Level of education | No formal education | 6 | 2.0 |
| Primary | 25 | 8.5 | |
| Secondary | 118 | 40.3 | |
| University | 144 | 49.1 | |
| Occupation of woman | Employed | 130 | 44.4 |
| Not employed | 163 | 55.6 | |
| Occupation of partner | Employed | 271 | 92.5 |
| Not employed | 22 | 7.5 | |
| Gravid status | Primigravida (1) | 106 | 36.2 |
| Multigravida (2–4) | 152 | 51.9 | |
| Grand multigravida (≥ 5) | 35 | 11.9 | |
| Parity | Nullipara (0) | 126 | 43.0 |
| Paucipara (1–2) | 124 | 124.0 | |
| Multipara (3–4) | 38 | 38.0 | |
| Grand multipara (5) | 5 | 1.7 |
The mean age at presentation for first ANC was 27.8 ± 5.4 years with about a 3/5 of the participants 26–35 years. Table 1 shows the distribution of baseline sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of participants at presentation
Reasons of late first ANC in the 129 participants who started booking ANC after 12 weeks
| Reason | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Financial difficulties | 45 | 34.5 |
| Busy schedule | 25 | 19.4 |
| Uncertainty of pregnancy | 9 | 7.0 |
| Fatigue | 3 | 2.3 |
| Unawareness of gestational age | 2 | 1.6 |
| Laziness | 8 | 6.2 |
| Thought this was the right time to come | 12 | 9.3 |
| Long distance to the hospital | 45 | 34.5 |
| In apparent good health | 18 | 14.0 |
The mean gestational age at booking was 14 weeks ±1.2 week. Amongst the 293 first ANC attendants, 129 participants (44.0%) started their booking ANC late (after 12 weeks of gestation). As shown on Fig. 2, for those who started their first ANC late, 68.2% (30.0% of total) started between 20th -28th of gestation. The commonest reasons of late first ANC advanced by these 129 participants were financial difficulties (34.5%, 45), long distances to the hospital (34.5%, 45) and busy schedule (19.4%, 25). Other reasons advanced by these women for late initiation of ANC are as shown on Table 2
Fig. 2Classification according to gestational age at booking
Determinants of first ANC using univariate logistic regression
| Category | Characteristic | First ANC | OR (95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 12 weeks ( | > 12 weeks ( | ||||
| Number (%) | Number (%) | ||||
| Age distribution | 16–25 | 53 (32.3) | 30 (23.3) | 1 | |
| 26–35 | 92 (56.1) | 88 (68.2) | 1.21 (0.75–1.96) | 0.430 | |
| 36–45 | 19 (11.6) | 11 (8.5) | 0.71 (0.45–1.11) | ||
| Marital | Married | 64 (39.0) | 50 (38.8) | 1 | |
| Single | 100 (61.0) | 79 (61.2) | 0.99 (0.62–1.59) | 0.963 | |
| Level of education | Primary | 14 (8.5) | 11 (8.5) | 1 | |
| No formal education | 1 (0.6) | 5 (3.9) | 0.80 (0.43–1.52) | 0.350 | |
| Secondary | 62 (37.8) | 56 (43.4) | 1.26 (0.79–2.02) | 0.330 | |
| University | 87 (53.1) | 57 (44.2) | 0.701 (0.44–1.11) | 0.132 | |
| Occupation of woman | Not employed | 82 (50.0) | 81 (62.8) | 1.27 (0.69–2.35) | 0.445 |
| Employed | 82 (50.0) | 48 (37.2) | 1 | ||
| Gravid status | Multigravida (2–4) | 79 (48.2) | 73 (56.6) | 1 | |
| Primigravida (1) | 63 (38.4) | 43 (33.3) | 0.80 (0.50–1.30) | 0.369 | |
| Grand multigravida (≥5) | 22 (13.4) | 13 (10.1) | 0.32 (0.35–1.50) | 0.383 | |
| Parity | Multipara (2–4) | 22 (13.4) | 16 (12.4) | 1 | |
| Nullipara (0) | 77 (47.0) | 49 (38.0) | 0.69 (0.43–1.11) | 0.124 | |
| Paucipara (1) | 63 (38.4) | 61 (47.3) | 1.44 (0.90–2.30) | 0.128 | |
| Grand multipara (≥5) | 2 (1.2) | 3 (2.3) | 1.93 (0.32–11.72) | 0.476 | |
| Family size (F) | F < 4 | 98 (59.8) | 55 (42.6) | 1 | |
| F ≥ 4 | 66 (40.2) | 74 (57.4) | 2 .0 (1.25–3.19) | 0.004 | |
| Average monthly income (I) |
| 142 (86.6) | 71 (55.0) | 1 | |
|
| 22 (13.4) | 58 (45.0) | 3.2 (1.33–3.54) | 0.002 | |
| Distance to the hospital (D) | D < 10 km | 127 (77.4) | 84 (65.1) | 1 | |
| D ≥ 10 km | 37 (22.6) | 45 (34.9) | 1.84 (1.1–3.07) | 0.020 | |