Literature DB >> 29255302

Social transmission of avoidance among predators facilitates the spread of novel prey.

Rose Thorogood1,2, Hanna Kokko3, Johanna Mappes4.   

Abstract

Warning signals are an effective defence strategy for aposematic prey, but only if they are recognized by potential predators. If predators must eat prey to associate novel warning signals with unpalatability, how can aposematic prey ever evolve? Using experiments with great tits (Parus major) as predators, we show that social transmission enhances the acquisition of avoidance by a predator population. Observing another predator's disgust towards tasting one novel conspicuous prey item led to fewer aposematic than cryptic prey being eaten for the predator population to learn. Despite reduced personal encounters with unpalatable prey, avoidance persisted and increased over subsequent trials. Next we use a mathematical model to show that social transmission can shift the evolutionary trajectory of prey populations from fixation of crypsis to fixation of aposematism more easily than was previously thought. Therefore, social information use by predators has the potential to have evolutionary consequences across ecological communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29255302     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0418-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  11 in total

1.  The signal detection problem of aposematic prey revisited: integrating prior social and personal experience.

Authors:  Liisa Hämäläinen; Rose Thorogood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Anthropogenic noise impairs foraging for cryptic prey via cross-sensory interference.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Kees van Oers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Conspicuous animal signals avoid the cost of predation by being intermittent or novel: confirmation in the wild using hundreds of robotic prey.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Katrina Blazek; Thomas E White; Indraneil Das
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey.

Authors:  Liisa Hämäläinen; Johanna Mappes; Hannah M Rowland; Marianne Teichmann; Rose Thorogood
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Diversity of warning signal and social interaction influences the evolution of imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Renan Janke Bosque; J P Lawrence; Richard Buchholz; Guarino R Colli; Jessica Heppard; Brice Noonan
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The effect of social information from live demonstrators compared to video playback on blue tit foraging decisions.

Authors:  Liisa Hämäläinen; Hannah M Rowland; Johanna Mappes; Rose Thorogood
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Context-dependent coloration of prey and predator decision making in contrasting light environments.

Authors:  Ossi Nokelainen; Francisko de Moraes Rezende; Janne K Valkonen; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 8.  Conservation and management of the culture of bears.

Authors:  Christopher Servheen; Kerry A Gunther
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Social transmission in the wild can reduce predation pressure on novel prey signals.

Authors:  Liisa Hämäläinen; William Hoppitt; Hannah M Rowland; Johanna Mappes; Anthony J Fulford; Sebastian Sosa; Rose Thorogood
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Avian Emotions: Comparative Perspectives on Fear and Frustration.

Authors:  Mauricio R Papini; Julio C Penagos-Corzo; Andrés M Pérez-Acosta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.