Literature DB >> 22834761

Measuring the fitness benefits of male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.

Dominic A Edward1, Tracey Chapman.   

Abstract

It is increasingly realized that the potential for male mate choice is widespread across many taxa. However, measurements of the relative magnitude of the fitness benefits that such choice can confer are lacking. Here, we directly measured, in a comprehensive set of tests that manipulated key variables, the fitness benefits of male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster by measuring egg production in females that were chosen or rejected by males. The results provided significant evidence for male mate choice. In absolute terms, the observed degree of choice increased male fitness by an average of only 1.59 eggs. However, using a novel technique we show that this benefit of choice represented 14.5% of the maximum potential fitness benefit of choice. The magnitude of mate choice was not significantly altered by variation in (1) mate compatibility, (2) phenotypic plasticity in male mate choice, or (3) whether choosing males were preferred or nonpreferred by females. Overall, we show that male mate choice represents a subtle but significant opportunity for sexual selection, and we offer a novel and widely applicable method for quantifying mate choice.
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22834761     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01648.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

Review 1.  Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Akanksha Singh; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Developmental Environment Effects on Sexual Selection in Male and Female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Juliano Morimoto; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Male mate choice as differential investment in contest competition is affected by female ornament expression.

Authors:  Stacey L Weiss; Matthew Dubin
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.624

5.  Variation in male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fitness Benefits of Mate Choice for Compatibility in a Socially Monogamous Species.

Authors:  Malika Ihle; Bart Kempenaers; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Covariation and repeatability of male mating effort and mating preferences in a promiscuous fish.

Authors:  Jean-Guy J Godin; Heather L Auld
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Free mate choice does not influence reproductive success in humans.

Authors:  Piotr Sorokowski; Agata Groyecka; Maciej Karwowski; Upma Manral; Amit Kumar; Agnieszka Niemczyk; Michalina Marczak; Michał Misiak; Agnieszka Sorokowska; Thomas Huanca; Esther Conde; Bogdan Wojciszke; Bogusław Pawłowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Mate choice in fruit flies is rational and adaptive.

Authors:  Devin Arbuthnott; Tatyana Y Fedina; Scott D Pletcher; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 17.694

10.  The effects of a bacterial challenge on reproductive success of fruit flies evolved under low or high sexual selection.

Authors:  Magdalena Nystrand; Elizabeth J Cassidy; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.