Literature DB >> 29254869

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy is a safe and effective procedure for patients with bladder cancer compared to laparoscopic and open surgery: Perioperative outcomes of a single-center experience.

Kazumasa Matsumoto1, Ken-Ichi Tabata2, Takahiro Hirayama2, Soichiro Shimura2, Morihiro Nishi2, Daisuke Ishii2, Tetsuo Fujita2, Masatsugu Iwamura2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients with bladder cancer according to three different procedures: robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RALC), laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC), and open radical cystectomy (ORC).
METHODS: From April 2008 to March 2017, 36 consecutive patients underwent radical cystectomy and ileal conduit with RALC (n = 10), LRC (n = 10), or ORC (n = 16). All patients underwent RALC and LRC with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Perioperative data were patient demographics, perioperative laboratory data including hematocrit and creatinine, intraoperative crystalloids and colloids, estimated blood loss (EBL), allogeneic transfusion, respiratory parameters including maximum end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) and respiratory rate, arterial blood gas data including highest pH, partial pressure of CO2 (PaCO2), partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), operative time, opiate consumption including intraoperative and postoperative anesthesia, time of hospital stay, time to oral intake and normal diet, and adverse events.
RESULTS: EBL was less for RALC than for other procedures (p = 0.0004). No blood transfusions were performed for RALC, but ORC required significant blood transfusions (p = 0.003). Respiratory rate was highest and PaCO2 was lowest for RALC. Preoperative creatinine levels were significantly worse for the RALC group, but no significant differences were noted after surgery. There were no significant differences among the groups in regard to hematocrit levels. Operative time, laparoscopic time, intraoperative anesthesia, and postoperative anesthesia did not differ among the groups. High-grade adverse events were only seen for ORC.
CONCLUSION: Although RALC required a steep Trendelenburg position, which might add elements of risk, RALC was safe even for this small cohort.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Cystectomy; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotics; Urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29254869     DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  11 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative outcomes and safety of robotic vs open cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12,640 cases.

Authors:  Keiran D Clement; Emily Pearce; Ahmed H Gabr; Bhavan P Rai; Abdulla Al-Ansari; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the peri-operative role of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion in robotic-assisted laparoscopic oncosurgeries.

Authors:  Sumitra G Bakshi; Susan V Paulin; Pranay Bhawalkar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-09-01

3.  DJ-1 Expression Might Serve as a Biologic Marker in Patients with Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Shuhei Hirano; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Kei Tanaka; Noriyuki Amano; Dai Koguchi; Masaomi Ikeda; Yuriko Shimizu; Benio Tsuchiya; Ryo Nagashio; Yuichi Sato; Masatsugu Iwamura
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Current evidence for robotic surgery in radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Chi Hang Yee; Jeremy Yuen-Chun; Eddie Shu-Yin Chan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-09-22

5.  National database of patients treated with radical cystectomy provides a current standard and comparison for future technologies.

Authors:  Kazumasa Matsumoto
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-05

Review 6.  Utility of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama; Kazuhide Makiyama; Toru Shimazui; Tomoaki Miyagawa; Kosuke Mizutani; Tomohiro Tsuchiya; Taku Kato; Keita Nakane
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  Impact of salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy on prognosis in patients with recurrence after radical cystectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

Authors:  Dai Koguchi; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Masaomi Ikeda; Yoshinori Taoka; Takahiro Hirayama; Yasukiyo Murakami; Takuji Utsunomiya; Daisuke Matsuda; Norihiko Okuno; Akira Irie; Masatsugu Iwamura
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.090

8.  Bayesian network analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Lin Dong; Yu Qin; Lu Ya; Cao Liang; Hu Tinghui; He Pinlin; Yang Jin; Wang Youliang; Cui Shu; Wu Tao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Expression of Membranous CD155 Is Associated with Aggressive Phenotypes and a Poor Prognosis in Patients with Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Kohei Mori; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Noriyuki Amano; Dai Koguchi; Soichiro Shimura; Masahiro Hagiwara; Yuriko Shimizu; Masaomi Ikeda; Yuichi Sato; Masatsugu Iwamura
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in a Laparoscopic Naïve Center.

Authors:  Waleed Mohamed Fadlalla; Ayman Hanafy; Mahmoud Abdelhakim; Hatem Aboulkassem; El Sayed Ashraf; Ahmed Abdelbary
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.