Literature DB >> 29254522

The Use of Rapid Review Methods for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Carrie D Patnode1, Michelle L Eder2, Emily S Walsh2, Meera Viswanathan3, Jennifer S Lin2.   

Abstract

Rapid review products are intended to synthesize available evidence in a timely fashion while still meeting the needs of healthcare decision makers. Various methods and products have been applied for rapid evidence syntheses, but no single approach has been uniformly adopted. Methods to gain efficiency and compress the review time period include focusing on a narrow clinical topic and key questions; limiting the literature search; performing single (versus dual) screening of abstracts and full-text articles for relevance; and limiting the analysis and synthesis. In order to maintain the scientific integrity, including transparency, of rapid evidence syntheses, it is imperative that procedures used to streamline standard systematic review methods are prespecified, based on sound review principles and empiric evidence when possible, and provide the end user with an accurate and comprehensive synthesis. The collection of clinical preventive service recommendations maintained by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, along with its commitment to rigorous methods development, provide a unique opportunity to refine, implement, and evaluate rapid evidence synthesis methods and add to an emerging evidence base on rapid review methods. This paper summarizes the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's use of rapid review methodology, its criteria for selecting topics for rapid evidence syntheses, and proposed methods to streamline the review process.
Copyright © 2018 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29254522     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  10 in total

Review 1.  Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Rami P Atallah; Roger D Struble; Robert G Badgett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Semi-automated Tools for Systematic Searches.

Authors:  Gaelen P Adam; Byron C Wallace; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Combining abbreviated literature searches with single-reviewer screening: three case studies of rapid reviews.

Authors:  Lisa Affengruber; Gernot Wagner; Siw Waffenschmidt; Stefan K Lhachimi; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Kylie Thaler; Ursula Griebler; Irma Klerings; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-18

4.  Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review.

Authors:  Siw Waffenschmidt; Marco Knelangen; Wiebke Sieben; Stefanie Bühn; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking.

Authors:  Zachary E Fox; Annette M Williams; Mallory N Blasingame; Taneya Y Koonce; Sheila V Kusnoor; Jing Su; Patricia Lee; Marcia I Epelbaum; Helen M Naylor; Spencer J DesAutels; Elizabeth T Frakes; Nunzia Bettinsoli Giuse
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01

6.  Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Tarek Nayfeh; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Peter O'Blenis; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership.

Authors:  Mala Mann; Amanda Woodward; Annmarie Nelson; Anthony Byrne
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2019-12-16

8.  Exploring the effectiveness of telehealth interventions for diagnosis, contact tracing and care of Corona Virus Disease of 2019 (COVID19) patients in sub Saharan Africa: a rapid review.

Authors:  Tarisai Kudakwashe Manyati; Morgen Mutsau
Journal:  Health Technol (Berl)       Date:  2021-02-09

9.  Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews.

Authors:  Valerie J King; Adrienne Stevens; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Chris Kamel; Chantelle Garritty
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-30

Review 10.  Operational Considerations for Physical Therapy During COVID-19: A Rapid Review.

Authors:  Kristy Wittmeier; Joanne Parsons; Sandra Webber; Nicole Askin; Adrian Salonga
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2020-10-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.