Literature DB >> 29250426

Crystal structure of methyl 2-[5-(2-hy-droxy-phen-yl)-2H-tetra-zol-2-yl]acetate.

Seul Gi Lee1, Ji Yeon Ryu1, Junseong Lee1.   

Abstract

The title compound, C10H10N4O3, was synthesized by the esterification of hy-droxy-phenyl tetra-zole. There is an intra-molecular O-H⋯N hydrogen bond present involving the hy-droxy group and the tetra-zole ring. The tetra-zole ring is inclined to the phenol ring by 2.85 (13)°, while the methyl acetate group is almost normal to the tetra-zole ring, making a dihedral angle of 82.61 (14)°. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by pairs of C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers. Within the dimers, the phenol rings are linked by offset π-π inter-actions [inter-centroid distance = 3.759 (2) Å]. There are no further significant inter-molecular inter-actions present in the crystal. The hy-droxy group is disordered about positions 2 and 6 on the benzene ring, with a refined occupancy ratio of 0.531 (5):0.469 (5).

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; hy­droxy­phenyl tetra­zole; offset π–π inter­actions; tetra­zole

Year:  2017        PMID: 29250426      PMCID: PMC5730263          DOI: 10.1107/S205698901701698X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Tetra­zole ligands are useful building blocks for the construction of high-dimensional metal–organic frameworks by providing various binding modes toward metal centers (Karaghiosoff et al., 2009 ▸; Liu et al., 2013 ▸). Recently, we have used 5-(2-hy­droxy­phen­yl)tetra­zole as a chelating multidentate ligand and reported several inter­esting compounds (Park et al., 2015 ▸; 2014 ▸). It provides strong [N,O] chelation to metal centers with various additional binding modes. As part of a project on the study of the substitution effects on the tetra­zole ring on the self-assembly behaviour in solution, as well as in the solid state, we have synthesized a number of substituted hy­droxy­phenyl tetra­zole complexes. The substitution of the tetra­zole group may promote supra­molecular inter­action by weak inter­actions, such as hydrogen bonding. The reaction between hy­droxy­phenyl tetra­zole and bromo acetate methyl ester in the presence of potassium carbonate gave three isomeric products. Using column chromatography, the major product was isolated and its mol­ecular structure was determined unambiguously by X-ray crystallography. We report herein, the synthesis and crystal structure of this compound.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The structure analysis confirms the nature of the major product of the reaction, which yielded three isomeric compounds as described in Section 5, Synthesis and crystallization. The title mol­ecule consists of a tetra­zole ring (N1–N4/C1) and a phenol ring (C2–C7), which are connected by an intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond (Fig. 1 ▸, Table 1 ▸) and inclined to one another by 2.85 (13)°. The planar methyl acetate group [O2/O3/C8–C10; maximum deviation of 0.037 (2) Å for atom O2] is inclined to the tetra­zole ring by 82.61 (14)°.
Figure 1

A view of the mol­ecular structure of the title compound, with the atom labelling and 30% probability displacement ellipsoids. The intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond (see Table 1 ▸) is indicated by a dashed line. Only the major component of the disordered OH group, in position 2, is shown.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N10.841.912.659 (4)148
C5—H5⋯O3i 0.952.573.472 (3)158

Symmetry code: (i) .

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, the mol­ecules are linked by pairs of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers with an (22) loop (Table 1 ▸, Fig. 2 ▸). Within the dimers, the phenol rings are linked by offset π–π inter­actions [CgCg i = 3.759 (2) Å, inter­planar distance = 3.526 (1) Å, slippage 1.305 Å; Cg is the centroid of the C2–C7 phenol ring, symmetry code: (i) −x + 1, −y, −z + 1]. There are no further significant inter­molecular inter­actions present in the crystal.
Figure 2

A view along the a axis of the crystal packing of the title compound. The intra- and inter­molecular hydrogen bonds (see Table 1 ▸) are indicated by dashed lines. The offset π–π inter­actions are shown as dashed double arrows. Only H atoms H1 and H5, and the major component of the disordered OH group in position 2, have been included.

Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.38, update May 2017; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) for the methyl 2-(5-phenyl-2H-tetra­zol-2-yl)acetate skeleton revealed only two hits, viz. ethyl (Z)-3-phenyl-2-(5-phenyl-2H-tetra­zol-2-yl)-2-propenoate (SAKVIM; Ramazani et al., 2017 ▸) and methyl (5-phenyl-2H-tetra­zol-2-yl)acetate (WUKNUN; Saeed et al., 2015 ▸). In WUKNUN, the 5-phenyl substituent is inclined to the tetra­zole ring by 3.89 (7)°, compared to 2.85 (13)° in the title compound. In contrast, the corresponding dihedral angle in SAKVIM is 19.97 (16)°. The meth­yl/ethyl acetate groups are inclined to the plane of the tetra­zole ring by 84.99 (7)° in WUKNUN and 84.57 (7)° in SAKVIM, similar to the value observed in the title compound, viz. 82.61 (14)°.

Synthesis and crystallization

The synthesis of the title compound is illustrated in Fig. 3 ▸. 2-(2H-Tetra­zol-5-yl)phenol (100 mg, 0.62 mmol) and potassium carbonate (85.0 mg, 0.62 mmol) were dissolved in aceto­nitrile at 273 K while stirring for 30 min. To the resulting solution methyl 2-bromo­acetate (207 µl, 2.18 mmol) was added and stirring was continued for 24 h. The white solid that was obtained was filtered and the solvent removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using ether:hexane (2:3) as eluent. Three isomeric compounds were obtained, as shown in Fig. 3 ▸. The major product (I) (yield = 59%), was recrystallized in di­chloro­methane and yielded needle-like colourless crystals of the title compound. Spectroscopic data: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400MHz): δ = 9.59 (s, 1H, OH), 8.06 (d, 1H, Ph), 7.41 (t, 1H, Ph), 7.11 (d, 1H, Ph), 6.99 (t, 1H, Ph), 5.51 (s, 2H), 3.85 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 165.06, 164.68, 156.42, 132.44, 127.50, 120.06, 117.62, 53.41, 53.38 ppm.
Figure 3

Reaction scheme for the synthesis of the title compound, (I).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. The hy­droxy group is disordered about positions 2 and 6 on the phenol ring, with a refined occupancy ratio of 0.531 (5):0.469 (5). All the H atoms were included in calculated positions using a riding model: O—H = 0.84 Å, C-H = 0.95–1.00 Å with U iso(H) = 1.5 U eq(O-hydroxyl, C-meth­yl) and 1.2U eq(C) for other H atoms.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC10H10N4O3
M r 234.22
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)10.060 (2), 8.2538 (17), 13.536 (3)
β (°)104.479 (10)
V3)1088.2 (4)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.11
Crystal size (mm)0.15 × 0.10 × 0.10
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
T min, T max 0.987, 0.989
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections14003, 2372, 1252
R int 0.044
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.642
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.057, 0.137, 1.02
No. of reflections2372
No. of parameters167
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.14, −0.17

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, Global. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901701698X/su5409sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901701698X/su5409Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901701698X/su5409Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1587621 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H10N4O3F(000) = 488
Mr = 234.22Dx = 1.430 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 10.060 (2) ÅCell parameters from 3134 reflections
b = 8.2538 (17) Åθ = 2.9–24.3°
c = 13.536 (3) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
β = 104.479 (10)°T = 100 K
V = 1088.2 (4) Å3Needle, colourless
Z = 40.15 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1252 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.044
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)θmax = 27.2°, θmin = 2.1°
Tmin = 0.987, Tmax = 0.989h = −12→12
14003 measured reflectionsk = −10→10
2372 independent reflectionsl = −17→17
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.057Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.137H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0479P)2 + 0.3171P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2372 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
167 parametersΔρmax = 0.14 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
O10.3781 (3)0.2337 (4)0.3644 (3)0.0745 (14)0.531 (5)
H10.45340.27550.36230.112*0.531 (5)
O20.92819 (16)0.46762 (19)0.26859 (14)0.0718 (5)
O30.92563 (18)0.2756 (2)0.38419 (16)0.0879 (6)
O1A0.5939 (5)0.1877 (6)0.7094 (3)0.1031 (19)0.469 (5)
H1A0.65570.23770.69000.155*0.469 (5)
N10.61929 (19)0.3786 (2)0.43476 (16)0.0618 (5)
N20.7415 (2)0.4500 (2)0.46016 (19)0.0679 (6)
N30.8043 (2)0.4384 (3)0.5571 (2)0.0890 (7)
N40.7203 (2)0.3567 (3)0.59958 (17)0.0826 (7)
C10.6085 (2)0.3209 (3)0.5240 (2)0.0574 (6)
C20.4922 (2)0.2276 (2)0.53816 (19)0.0555 (6)
C30.4899 (3)0.1677 (3)0.6336 (3)0.0749 (7)
H30.56380.19110.69080.090*0.531 (5)
C40.3811 (4)0.0744 (3)0.6462 (3)0.0916 (10)
H40.38100.03340.71170.110*
C50.2743 (3)0.0412 (3)0.5647 (3)0.0913 (10)
H50.2001−0.02370.57340.110*
C60.2733 (3)0.1010 (3)0.4701 (3)0.0831 (8)
H60.19780.07900.41370.100*
C70.3818 (3)0.1929 (3)0.4565 (2)0.0652 (7)
H70.38080.23300.39050.078*0.469 (5)
C80.8045 (3)0.5246 (3)0.3866 (2)0.0778 (8)
H8A0.86190.61700.41890.093*
H8B0.73220.56700.32880.093*
C90.8923 (2)0.4048 (3)0.3474 (2)0.0635 (7)
C101.0223 (3)0.3749 (3)0.2257 (2)0.0834 (8)
H10A1.04020.43340.16740.125*
H10B0.98170.26910.20310.125*
H10C1.10870.35940.27760.125*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.063 (2)0.086 (3)0.071 (3)−0.0122 (18)0.0098 (17)0.0043 (19)
O20.0666 (11)0.0501 (10)0.1035 (13)0.0043 (8)0.0303 (10)0.0086 (10)
O30.0893 (13)0.0446 (10)0.1425 (17)0.0147 (9)0.0529 (12)0.0194 (11)
O1A0.127 (4)0.118 (4)0.062 (3)0.006 (3)0.018 (3)0.011 (3)
N10.0533 (12)0.0445 (11)0.0897 (15)0.0028 (10)0.0215 (11)−0.0002 (11)
N20.0570 (13)0.0463 (12)0.1035 (18)0.0007 (10)0.0260 (13)−0.0040 (12)
N30.0684 (15)0.0838 (18)0.111 (2)−0.0131 (14)0.0151 (15)−0.0115 (16)
N40.0699 (15)0.0835 (16)0.0897 (17)−0.0084 (13)0.0113 (13)−0.0090 (13)
C10.0534 (15)0.0414 (12)0.0779 (17)0.0082 (11)0.0172 (13)−0.0068 (13)
C20.0568 (14)0.0374 (12)0.0754 (17)0.0095 (11)0.0225 (13)−0.0017 (12)
C30.085 (2)0.0605 (17)0.082 (2)0.0139 (15)0.0271 (18)0.0054 (16)
C40.118 (3)0.0586 (18)0.119 (3)0.0109 (19)0.069 (2)0.0116 (18)
C50.096 (2)0.0504 (17)0.151 (3)−0.0090 (16)0.074 (2)−0.015 (2)
C60.0686 (18)0.0668 (18)0.121 (3)−0.0077 (15)0.0376 (17)−0.0194 (18)
C70.0604 (16)0.0517 (15)0.088 (2)0.0008 (12)0.0273 (15)−0.0047 (14)
C80.0703 (16)0.0433 (14)0.130 (2)0.0011 (12)0.0439 (17)0.0049 (15)
C90.0474 (13)0.0384 (13)0.106 (2)−0.0044 (11)0.0219 (13)−0.0004 (14)
C100.0779 (18)0.0708 (18)0.110 (2)0.0042 (15)0.0398 (16)−0.0052 (16)
O1—C71.282 (4)N4—C11.351 (3)
O2—C91.315 (3)C1—C21.452 (3)
O2—C101.447 (3)C2—C71.387 (3)
O3—C91.190 (3)C2—C31.388 (3)
O1A—C31.280 (5)C3—C41.383 (4)
N1—C11.328 (3)C4—C51.362 (4)
N1—N21.329 (3)C5—C61.370 (4)
N2—N31.310 (3)C6—C71.378 (3)
N2—C81.445 (3)C8—C91.508 (3)
N3—N41.319 (3)
C9—O2—C10117.19 (18)O1A—C3—C4119.1 (4)
C1—N1—N2101.8 (2)O1A—C3—C2119.9 (3)
N3—N2—N1114.2 (2)C4—C3—C2120.7 (3)
N3—N2—C8122.4 (2)C5—C4—C3120.0 (3)
N1—N2—C8123.2 (2)C4—C5—C6120.3 (3)
N2—N3—N4105.9 (2)C5—C6—C7120.1 (3)
N3—N4—C1106.5 (2)O1—C7—C6116.2 (3)
N1—C1—N4111.6 (2)O1—C7—C2122.9 (3)
N1—C1—C2124.2 (2)C6—C7—C2120.7 (3)
N4—C1—C2124.2 (2)N2—C8—C9111.09 (19)
C7—C2—C3118.1 (2)O3—C9—O2126.0 (2)
C7—C2—C1121.0 (2)O3—C9—C8124.7 (2)
C3—C2—C1120.8 (2)O2—C9—C8109.3 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···N10.841.912.659 (4)148
C5—H5···O3i0.952.573.472 (3)158
  9 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  A combined experimental and theoretical study of the tautomeric and conformational properties of (5-phenyl-tetrazol-2-yl)-acetic acid methyl ester.

Authors:  Aamer Saeed; Muhammad Qasim; Majid Hussain; Ulrich Flörke; Mauricio F Erben
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Structural motif-dependent magnetic diversity observed in three-dimensional tetrazolyl-based MMOFs: synthesis, structures and magnetism.

Authors:  Zhong-Yi Liu; Hong-Ai Zou; Zhao-Jun Hou; En-Cui Yang; Xiao-Jun Zhao
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  Selective Formation of Heterometallic Ru-Ag Supramolecules via Stoichiometric Control of Multiple Different Tectons.

Authors:  Yu Jin Park; Ji Yeon Ryu; Halima Begum; Min Hyung Lee; Peter J Stang; Junseong Lee
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Energetic silver salts with 5-aminotetrazole ligands.

Authors:  Konstantin Karaghiosoff; Thomas M Klapötke; Carles Miró Sabaté
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  New class of scorpionate: tris(tetrazolyl)-iron complex and its different coordination modes for alkali metal ions.

Authors:  Ka Hyun Park; Kang Mun Lee; Min Jeong Go; Sung Ho Choi; Hyoung-Ryun Park; Youngjo Kim; Junseong Lee
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 5.165

7.  Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determination.

Authors:  Lennard Krause; Regine Herbst-Irmer; George M Sheldrick; Dietmar Stalke
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.304

8.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

9.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.