| Literature DB >> 29250102 |
Xuan D Ho1,2, Hoang G Nguyen3, Le H Trinh3, Ene Reimann2,4, Ele Prans2, Gea Kõks2, Katre Maasalu5,6, Van Q Le3, Van H Nguyen3, Nghi T N Le7, Phuong Phung1, Aare Märtson5,6, Freddy Lattekivi2, Sulev Kõks2,4.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OS) is a rare malignant bone tumor. It affects mostly young persons and has poor outcome with the present treatment. No improvement was observed since the introduction of chemotherapy. The better understanding of osteosarcoma development could indicate better management strategy. Repetitive DNA elements were found to play a role in cancer mechanism especially in epithelial tumors but not yet analyzed in osteosarcoma. We conducted the study to analyse the expression profile of repetitive elements (RE) in osteosarcoma.Entities:
Keywords: human endogenous retrovirus; osteosarcoma; repetitive elements; satellite; sequence; transposable elements
Year: 2017 PMID: 29250102 PMCID: PMC5714928 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Characteristics of osteosarcoma patients in the present study.
| OSVN001 | 16 | Female | Femur | No | Yes |
| OSVN003 | 13 | Male | Femur | No | Yes |
| OSVN004 | 16 | Female | Femur | No | Yes |
| OSVN005 | 18 | Male | Femur | No | Yes |
| OSVN006 | 18 | Male | Femur | No | Yes |
| OSHN008 | 24 | Female | Tibia | No | yes |
| OSVN008 | 52 | Male | Femur | Yes | No |
| OSHN009 | 16 | Male | Femur | No | Yes |
| OSHN010 | 20 | Female | Femur | No | Yes |
| OSHN011 | 07 | Male | Tibia | No | Yes |
| OSHN012 | 11 | Male | Humerus | No | No |
| OSHN013 | 17 | Male | Femur | No | No |
| OSHN014 | 16 | Female | Tibia | No | Yes |
| OSVN015 | 15 | Male | Tibia | No | Yes |
| OSHN015 | 8 | Female | Tibia | No | Yes |
| OSHN016 | 20 | Male | Femur | No | Yes |
| OSHN017 | 16 | Male | Humerus | No | Yes |
| OSDN001 | 23 | Male | Tibia | Yes | Yes |
Ranking from the lowest FDR, ten most significant REs expressed differentially between osteosarcoma and normal control, FDR < 0.001.
| LTR | ERVL-MaLR | 0.612785 | 9.83E-10 | 1.07E-06 | |
| LTR | ERVK | 0.606272 | 4.58E-08 | 2.49E-05 | |
| LTR | ERV1 | 0.943969 | 1.09E-07 | 2.98E-05 | |
| LTR | ERV1 | 0.748537 | 1.01E-07 | 2.98E-05 | |
| RNA | RNA | 0.9486 | 3.17E-07 | 6.91E-05 | |
| LTR | ERV1 | 0.72914 | 4.78E-07 | 8.68E-05 | |
| LTR | Gypsy | −0.41918 | 7.13E-07 | 0.000111 | |
| Satellite | centr | 1.291039 | 1.08E-06 | 0.000147 | |
| DNA | DNA | 1.412429 | 1.27E-06 | 0.000154 | |
| Satellite | Satellite | 1.878344 | 3.66E-06 | 0.000366 |
REs with the lowest FDR were THE1C-int, LTR5, MER57F, MER87B. These elements belong to long terminal repeats (LTR) class and they are all upregulated in OS (logFC > 0.5). ALR_Alpha and HSATII were the most significant satellites that expressed differentially between OS and normal control samples.
Satellites were found to be the most upregulated elements in OS.
| Satellite | Satellite | 2.052918 | 5.08E−05 | 0.003461 | |
| Satellite | Satellite | 1.878344 | 3.66E−06 | 0.000366 | |
| Satellite | Satellite | 1.481369 | 3.7E−06 | 0.000366 | |
| DNA | DNA | 1.412429 | 1.27E−06 | 0.000154 | |
| Satellite | centr | 1.291039 | 1.08E−06 | 0.000147 | |
| Satellite | Satellite | 1.115843 | 0.000789 | 0.01829 |
By ranking logFC, the highest ones compose of SAR, HSATII, and -CATTC-n with high significance (FDR < 0.01).
Ranking by the lowest logFC, the table includes the most downregulated repetitive elements in osteosarcoma.
| DNA | TcMar | −0.99091 | 6.38 | 0.003862 | |
| tRNA | tRNA | −0.94009 | 0.001438 | 0.026562 | |
| LTR | ERV1 | −0.68333 | 0.000166 | 0.007247 | |
| LTR | ERVL-MaLR | −0.64431 | 0.00306 | 0.043679 | |
| LTR | ERV1 | −0.61309 | 0.000353 | 0.010703 | |
| LTR | ERV1 | −0.5277 | 0.000964 | 0.02144 | |
| LTR | ERV1 | −0.43948 | 0.000292 | 0.010112 | |
| LTR | ERVL | −0.43666 | 7.71E−05 | 0.0042 | |
| LTR | Gypsy | −0.41918 | 7.13E−07 | 0.000111 | |
| LTR | ERV1 | −0.37858 | 0.000402 | 0.011198 | |
| LTR | Gypsy | −0.35087 | 0.003015 | 0.043679 | |
| LTR | ERV1 | −0.34699 | 0.000763 | 0.01808 |
They are mostly HERVs.
Figure 1Differential expression of repetitive elements in OS was shown here. (A) Shows differentially expressed repetitive elements with significance while (B) Shows only elements expressed differentially with |logFC| > 0.5. (C) Shows the difference between tumor and non-tumor samples about REs expression.
Figure 2Heatmap of REs expression in 18 paired- fresh-bone samples stratified by tumor and non-tumor group, class of REs, gender, and chemotherapy vs. non-chemotherapy treated.
Figure 3Boxplot of z-score comparing tumor vs. normal samples in some most significant REs expressed in OS (LTR5, MER34B-int, MER57F, MER87B, and THE1C-int). They were all upregulated in affected bone vs. normal bone.