Literature DB >> 29248409

Trends of Incidence, Clinical Presentation, and In-Hospital Mortality Among Women With Acute Myocardial Infarction With or Without Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Population-Based Analysis.

Ahmed N Mahmoud1, Siva Sagar Taduru2, Amgad Mentias3, Dhruv Mahtta4, Amr F Barakat5, Marwan Saad6, Akram Y Elgendy7, Mohammad K Mojadidi7, Mohamed Omer2, Ahmed Abuzaid8, Nayan Agarwal7, Islam Y Elgendy7, R David Anderson7, Jacqueline Saw9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to determine the clinical characteristics and in-hospital survival of women presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD).
BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation and in-hospital survival of women with AMI and SCAD remains unclear.
METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (2009 to 2014) was queried for all women with a primary diagnosis of AMI and concomitant SCAD. Iatrogenic coronary dissection was excluded. The main outcome was in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Among 752,352 eligible women with AMI, 7,347 had a SCAD diagnosis. Women with SCAD were younger (61.7 vs. 67.1 years of age) with less comorbidity. SCAD was associated with higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (6.8% vs. 3.4%). In SCAD patients, a decrease in in-hospital mortality was evident with time (11.4% in 2009 vs. 5.0% in 2014) and concurred with less percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (82.5% vs. 69.1%). Propensity score yielded 7,332 SCAD and 14,352 patients without SCAD. The odds ratio (OR) of in-hospital mortality remained higher with SCAD after propensity matching (OR: 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65 to 2.11) and on multivariable regression analyses (OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 2.07 to 2.80). PCI was associated with higher mortality in SCAD patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.00 to 4.47), but not with STEMI (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.96).
CONCLUSIONS: Women presenting with AMI and SCAD appear to be at higher risk of in-hospital mortality. Lower rates of PCI were associated with improved survival, with evidence of worse outcomes when PCI was performed for SCAD in the setting of non with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndrome(s); mortality; propensity score matching; women

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29248409     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  11 in total

1.  Lack of Association of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection With Autoimmune Disease.

Authors:  Vanessa L Kronzer; Alex D Tarabochia; Angie S Lobo Romero; Nicholas Y Tan; Thomas J O'Byrne; Cynthia S Crowson; Tamiel N Turley; Elena Myasoedova; John M Davis; Claire E Raphael; Rajiv Gulati; Sharonne N Hayes; Marysia S Tweet
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Authors:  Saber Hassan; Rohit Samuel; Andrew Starovoytov; Carolyn Lee; Eve Aymong; Jacqueline Saw
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Canadian spontaneous coronary artery dissection cohort study: in-hospital and 30-day outcomes.

Authors:  Jacqueline Saw; Andrew Starovoytov; Karin Humphries; Tej Sheth; Derek So; Kunal Minhas; Neil Brass; Andrea Lavoie; Helen Bishop; Shahar Lavi; Colin Pearce; Suzanne Renner; Mina Madan; Robert C Welsh; Sohrab Lutchmedial; Ram Vijayaraghavan; Eve Aymong; Bryan Har; Reda Ibrahim; Heather L Gornik; Santhi Ganesh; Christopher Buller; Alexis Matteau; Giuseppe Martucci; Dennis Ko; Giovanni Battista John Mancini
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 35.855

Review 4.  Update in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Authors:  Joseph Ingrassia; Daniel Diver; Aseem Vashist
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: contemporary aspects of diagnosis and patient management.

Authors:  Fernando Macaya; Pablo Salinas; Nieves Gonzalo; Antonio Fernández-Ortiz; Carlos Macaya; Javier Escaned
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-11-05

6.  Comparative Outcomes of Transapical Versus Transfemoral Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Diabetics.

Authors:  Ayman Elbadawi; Ahmed H Mohamed; Islam Y Elgendy; Gbolahan O Ogunbayo; Michael Megaly; Hend I Shahin; Karim Mahmoud; Mohamed A Omer; Ahmed Abuzaid; Ken Fujise; Syed Gilani
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2019-11-11

7.  Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Patients With a Provisional Diagnosis of Takotsubo Syndrome.

Authors:  Anaïs Hausvater; Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Jacqueline Saw; Mark Sherrid; Thara Ali; Dalisa Espinosa; Rediet Mersha; Maria DeFonte; Harmony R Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Risk Factors and Timing of Acute Myocardial Infarction Associated With Pregnancy: Insights From the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Courtney A Balgobin; Xiaoyue Zhang; Fabio V Lima; Cecilia Avila; Puja B Parikh; Jie Yang; Kathleen Stergiopoulos
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Sudden Cardiac Death Following Thrombolysis in a Young Woman with Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Case Report.

Authors:  Serigne Cheikh Tidiane Ndao; Amer Zabalawi; Mame Madjiguène Ka; Khadidiatou Dia; Waly N Mboup; Djibril M Ba; Laurent L P Payot; Régis T Delaunay; Pape D Fall; Mouhamed Cherif Mboup
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-25

Review 10.  Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissections: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giovanni Teruzzi; Giulia Santagostino Baldi; Sebastiano Gili; Gianluca Guarnieri; Piero Montorsi; Daniela Trabattoni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.