Literature DB >> 29248060

Demand elasticities and service selection incentives among competing private health plans.

Randall P Ellis1, Bruno Martins2, Wenjia Zhu3.   

Abstract

We examine selection incentives by health plans while refining the selection index of McGuire et al. (2014) to reflect not only service predictability and predictiveness but also variation in cost sharing, risk-adjusted profits, profit margins, and newly-refined demand elasticities across 26 disaggregated types of service. We contrast selection incentives, measured by service selection elasticities, across six plan types using privately-insured claims data from 73 large employers from 2008 to 2014. Compared to flat capitation, concurrent risk adjustment reduces the elasticity by 47%, prospective risk adjustment by 43%, simple reinsurance system by 32%, and combined concurrent risk adjustment with reinsurance by 60%. Reinsurance significantly reduces the variability of individual-level profits, but increases the correlation of expected spending with profits, which strengthens selection incentives.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Health care demand elasticities; Health insurance; Reinsurance; Risk adjustment; Risk selection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29248060     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  6 in total

1.  Modest risk-sharing significantly reduces health plans' incentives for service distortion.

Authors:  Shuli Brammli-Greenberg; Jacob Glazer; Ruth Waitzberg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-08-22

2.  Non-profit hospital mergers: the effect on healthcare costs and utilization.

Authors:  Maysam Rabbani
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2021-04-05

3.  Patients' preferences over care settings for minor illnesses and injuries.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Heather Ladd; Alpesh Amin; Dara H Sorkin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Measuring efficiency of health plan payment systems in managed competition health insurance markets.

Authors:  Timothy J Layton; Randall P Ellis; Thomas G McGuire; Richard van Kleef
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Machine learning versus regression modelling in predicting individual healthcare costs from a representative sample of the nationwide claims database in France.

Authors:  Alexandre Vimont; Henri Leleu; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-08-09

6.  Incorporating self-reported health measures in risk equalization through constrained regression.

Authors:  A A Withagen-Koster; R C van Kleef; F Eijkenaar
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-01-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.