Literature DB >> 29247750

Attentional responses to stimuli associated with a reward can occur in the absence of knowledge of their predictive values.

Mateo Leganes-Fonteneau1, Ryan Scott2, Theodora Duka3.   

Abstract

Classical conditioning theories of addiction suggest that stimuli associated with rewards acquire incentive salience, inducing emotional and attentional conditioned responses. It is not clear whether those responses occur without contingency awareness (CA), i.e. are based on explicit or implicit learning processes. Examining implicit aspects of stimulus-reward associations can improve our understanding of addictive behaviours, supporting treatment and prevention strategies. However, the acquisition of conditioned responses without CA has yet to be rigorously demonstrated, as the existing literature shows a lack of methodological agreement regarding the measurement of implicit and explicit processes. The purpose of two experiments presented here was to study the emotional value acquired by CS through implicit emotional and attentional processes, trying to overcome critical methodological issues. Experiment 1 (n = 48) paired two stimuli categories (houses/buildings) with high (HR) or low (LR) probabilities of monetary reward. An Emotional Attentional Blink revealed preferential attention for HR over LR regardless of CA; while pleasantness ratings were unaffected, probably due to the intrinsic nature of CS. Experiment 2 (n = 60) replicated the effect of conditioning on the Emotional Attentional Blink utilising abstract CS (octagons/squares). In addition increased pleasantness for HR over LR was found significant overall, and marginally significant for Aware but not for Unaware participants. Here CA was rigorously determined using a signal-detection analysis and metacognitive-awareness measurements. Bayesian analyses verified the unconscious nature of the learning. These findings demonstrate that attentional conditioned responses can occur without CA and advance our understanding of the mechanisms by which implicit conditioning can occur and becomes observable. Furthermore, these results can highlight how addictive behaviours might develop.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional blink; Bayesian; Contingency awareness; Implicit conditioning; Metacognition; Pleasantness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29247750     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim; Mark K Britton; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-06-12

2.  Pavlovian learning in the selection history-dependent control of overt spatial attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Ming-Ray Liao; Laurent Grégoire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 3.  An adaptive view of attentional control.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2021-12

Review 4.  Avoiding pitfalls: Bayes factors can be a reliable tool for post hoc data selection in implicit learning.

Authors:  M Leganes-Fonteneau; R Scott; T Duka; Z Dienes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-25

5.  More than meets the heart: systolic amplification of different emotional faces is task dependent.

Authors:  Mateo Leganes-Fonteneau; Jennifer F Buckman; Keisuke Suzuki; Anthony Pawlak; Marsha E Bates
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2020-10-19

6.  Knowledge about the predictive value of reward conditioned stimuli modulates their interference with cognitive processes.

Authors:  Mateo Leganes-Fonteneau; Kyriaki Nikolaou; Ryan Scott; Theodora Duka
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.