Literature DB >> 29247396

The mechanism in junctional failure of thoraco-lumbar fusions. Part II: Analysis of a series of PJK after thoraco-lumbar fusion to determine parameters allowing to predict the risk of junctional breakdown.

Antonio A Faundez1, Jonathon Richards2, Philippe Maxy3, Rachel Price2, Amélie Léglise2, Jean-Charles Le Huec2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors, in 12 patients with junctional breakdown (JBD) after thoraco-sacral fusions and to test a software locating maximal bending moment on full spine EOS images.
METHODS: Twelve patients underwent long fusions for lumbar degenerative pathologies. Preop EOS images were compared to first postop EOS showing JBD. Parameters analyzed were: spinopelvic parameters [pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), spinosacral angle (SSA), lordosis, and kyphosis], proximal junctional angle (PJA), odontoid-hip axis angle (ODHA), and CIA. A new software estimated the location of maximum bending moment (M max) before and after JBD.
RESULTS: All patients except one had a JBD located between T10 and L1, diagnosed at average follow-up of 18.58 months. JBD was a fracture in six patients, severe adjacent disc degeneration in the remaining. Average PI was 52°. PT increased, SS decreased after JBD versus preop (p > 0.05). Average PJA was 34.5°. Global lordosis (GLL), upper lordosis (ULL), L4-S1 lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis (TK) were increased (p < 0.05). Lower lumbar lordosis (LLL), was not increased postJBD (p = 0.6). SVA, SSA, ODHA, and C7 slope were not modified (p > 0.05). CIA average value decreased by 7.5% after JBD. T1-T5 alignment was correlated to C7 slope before (R 2 = 0.77075) and after JBD (R 2 = 0.85409). ODHA decreased after JBD (p > 0.05). Most JBD occurred at or one level away from preoperative M max location.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of harmonious distribution of lumbar (GLL, ULL, and ILL) and thoracic curves (TK, T1-T5 segment) in thoraco-sacral fusions. All patients showed an exaggerated ULL, resulting in a posterior shift and increased lever arm at the thoraco-lumbar junction, leading to JBD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bending moment; Proximal junctional failure; Proximal junctional kyphosis; Sagittal balance; Vertebral fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29247396     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5426-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  31 in total

1.  Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Junghoon Kim; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; King B Akilah; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Moon Soo Park; Kwang Sup Song; Chaiwat Piyaskulkaew; Tapanut Chuntarapas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Biomechanical risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a detailed numerical analysis of surgical instrumentation variables.

Authors:  Marco Cammarata; Carl-Éric Aubin; Xiaoyu Wang; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Combined anterior-posterior surgery is the most important risk factor for developing proximal junctional kyphosis in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Mitsuru Yagi; Joseph Nyugen; Matthew E Cunningham; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Frances D Faro; Michelle C Marks; Jeffrey Pawelek; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Chris R Glattes; Seungchul Rhim; Gene Cheh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Incidence and risk factors for proximal and distal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for Scheuermann kyphosis: minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Francis Denis; Edward C Sun; Robert B Winter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior surgery of Scheuermann kyphosis: an operative technique.

Authors:  Hakan S Yanik; Ismail E Ketenci; Atilla Polat; Ayhan Ulusoy; Gokmen Deniz; Ozkan Kose; Sevki Erdem
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-03

10.  Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis after stopping at thoracolumbar junction have lower muscularity, fatty degeneration at the thoracolumbar area.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Yongjung J Kim; Seung-Chul Rhim
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  7 in total

1.  Sagittal balance of the spine.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; W Thompson; Y Mohsinaly; C Barrey; A Faundez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Compensatory mechanisms recruited against proximal junctional kyphosis by patients instrumented from the thoracolumbar junction to the iliac.

Authors:  Javier Pizones; Francisco Javier Sánchez Perez-Grueso; Lucía Moreno-Manzanaro; Fernando Escámez; Caglar Yilgor; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Nicomedes Fernández-Baíllo; José Miguel Sánchez-Márquez; Ibrahim Obeid; Frank Kleinstück; Ahmet Alanay; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  GAP score potential in predicting post-operative spinal mechanical complications: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  E Quarto; A Zanirato; M Pellegrini; S Vaggi; F Vitali; S Bourret; J C Le Huec; M Formica
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 4.  Parameters of sagittal balance in view of studies on patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis with cervical spine instability.

Authors:  Robert Wróblewski; Robert Gasik
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2022-01-12

5.  Can Machine Learning Accurately Predict Postoperative Compensation for the Uninstrumented Thoracic Spine and Pelvis After Fusion From the Lower Thoracic Spine to the Sacrum?

Authors:  Nathan J Lee; Zeeshan M Sardar; Venkat Boddapati; Justin Mathew; Meghan Cerpa; Eric Leung; Joseph Lombardi; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-10-08

6.  Pelvic and spinal postural changes between standing-sitting positions following lumbosacral fusion: a pilot study.

Authors:  Thomas Borgeaud; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Antonio Faundez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.479

7.  Instrumentation Techniques to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Timon F G Vercoulen; Remco J P Doodkorte; Alex Roth; Rob de Bie; Paul C Willems
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-07-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.