Elena Galli1, Christophe Leclercq1, Maxime Fournet2, Arnaud Hubert1, Anne Bernard3, Otto A Smiseth4, Philippe Mabo1, Eigil Samset4, Alfredo Hernandez5, Erwan Donal6. 1. Service de Cardiologie et CIC-IT INSERM 1414, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France; LTSI, Université de Rennes 1, INSERM, Rennes, France. 2. Service de Cardiologie et CIC-IT INSERM 1414, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France. 3. LTSI, Université de Rennes 1, INSERM, Rennes, France; Service de Cardiologue, CHRU Tours, Tours, France. 4. University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 5. LTSI, Université de Rennes 1, INSERM, Rennes, France. 6. Service de Cardiologie et CIC-IT INSERM 1414, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France; LTSI, Université de Rennes 1, INSERM, Rennes, France. Electronic address: erwan.donal@chu-rennes.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure is plagued by too many nonresponders. The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether the estimation of myocardial performance by pressure-strain loops (PSLs) is useful for the selection of CRT candidates. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients undergoing CRT were included in the study. Bidimensional and speckle-tracking echocardiography were performed before CRT and at the 6-month follow-up (FU). Conventional dyssynchrony parameters were evaluated. Left ventricular (LV) constructive work (CW) and wasted work (WW) were estimated by PSLs. Positive response to CRT (CRT+) was defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at FU and was observed in 63 (65%) patients. RESULTS: The addition of CW > 1,057 mm Hg% (area under the curve, 0.72, P < .0001) and WW > 384 mm Hg% (area under the curve, 0.67, P = .005) to a baseline model including clinical, echocardiographic, and conventional dyssynchrony parameters significantly increased the model power (χ2, 25.11 vs 47.5, P < .0001). In this model, septal flash (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78; P = .001), CW > 1,057 mm Hg% (OR = 9.49; P = .002), and WW > 384 mm Hg% (OR = 16.24, P < .006) remained the only parameters associated with CRT+. The combination of CW > 1,057 mm Hg% and WW > 384 mm Hg% showed a good specificity (100%) and positive predictive value (100%) but a low sensitivity (22%), negative predictive value (41%), and accuracy (49%) for the identification of CRT+. CONCLUSIONS: The estimation of CW and WW by PSLs is a novel tool for the assessment of CRT patients. Although these parameters cannot be used by their own to select CRT candidates, they can provide further insights into the comprehension of dyssynchrony mechanisms and contribute to improving the identification of CRT responders.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure is plagued by too many nonresponders. The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether the estimation of myocardial performance by pressure-strain loops (PSLs) is useful for the selection of CRT candidates. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients undergoing CRT were included in the study. Bidimensional and speckle-tracking echocardiography were performed before CRT and at the 6-month follow-up (FU). Conventional dyssynchrony parameters were evaluated. Left ventricular (LV) constructive work (CW) and wasted work (WW) were estimated by PSLs. Positive response to CRT (CRT+) was defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at FU and was observed in 63 (65%) patients. RESULTS: The addition of CW > 1,057 mm Hg% (area under the curve, 0.72, P < .0001) and WW > 384 mm Hg% (area under the curve, 0.67, P = .005) to a baseline model including clinical, echocardiographic, and conventional dyssynchrony parameters significantly increased the model power (χ2, 25.11 vs 47.5, P < .0001). In this model, septal flash (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78; P = .001), CW > 1,057 mm Hg% (OR = 9.49; P = .002), and WW > 384 mm Hg% (OR = 16.24, P < .006) remained the only parameters associated with CRT+. The combination of CW > 1,057 mm Hg% and WW > 384 mm Hg% showed a good specificity (100%) and positive predictive value (100%) but a low sensitivity (22%), negative predictive value (41%), and accuracy (49%) for the identification of CRT+. CONCLUSIONS: The estimation of CW and WW by PSLs is a novel tool for the assessment of CRTpatients. Although these parameters cannot be used by their own to select CRT candidates, they can provide further insights into the comprehension of dyssynchrony mechanisms and contribute to improving the identification of CRT responders.
Authors: Benjamin S Frank; Michal Schäfer; Johannes M Douwes; D Dunbar Ivy; Steven H Abman; Jesse A Davidson; Sandra Burzlaff; Max B Mitchell; Gareth J Morgan; Lorna P Browne; Alex J Barker; Uyen Truong; Johannes C von Alvensleben Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Tomas Zaremba; Bhupendar Tayal; Sam Riahi; Anna Margrethe Thøgersen; Niels Eske Bruun; Kasper Janus Grønn Emerek; Joseph Kisslo; Thomas Fritz Hansen; Niels Risum; Peter Søgaard Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Kimi P Owashi; Arnaud Hubert; Elena Galli; Erwan Donal; Alfredo I Hernández; Virginie Le Rolle Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Thuy T M Pham; Vien T Truong; Phuc N Vu; Truong X Tran; Nam N H Nguyen; Linh P T Nguyen; Hien N T Tu; Cassady Palmer; Justin T Tretter; Philip Levy; Wojciech Mazur; Vinh N Pham Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Felix Hedwig; Olena Nemchyna; Julia Stein; Christoph Knosalla; Nicolas Merke; Fabian Knebel; Andreas Hagendorff; Felix Schoenrath; Volkmar Falk; Jan Knierim Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-06-18