| Literature DB >> 29246167 |
Sachika Nakamura1,2, Mariko R Okamoto1,2,3, Ken Yamamoto1,4, Akihisa Tsurumoto4, Yoko Yoshino1,5, Hiroshi Iwabuchi6, Ichiro Saito1,7, Nobuko Maeda2, Yoichi Nakagawa8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the species of Candida that are important for the development of atrophic glossitis in xerostomia patients.Entities:
Keywords: Atrophic glossitis; Candida species; Candidiasis; Logistic regression analysis; Xerostomia
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29246167 PMCID: PMC5732471 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0449-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Fig. 1The grades of atrophic glossitis. 0, none; 1 (mild), the lingual papillae in the affected area of the tongue were smaller in size than those in the intact area; 2 (moderate), partial loss (<50%) of the lingual papillae on the dorsum of the tongue; 3 (severe), partial loss (>50%) of the lingual papillae on the dorsum of the tongue; and 4 (profound loss)
Characteristics of study population
| Atrophic glossitis | Number | Age | Male:Female | Saliva flow rate | Denture wearer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSFR | SSFR | |||||
| Grade 0 | 185 | 63.4 ± 12.5 | 37:148 | 2.4 ± 2.7 | 12.2 ± 6.9 | 67/185 (36.2%) |
| Grade 1 | 15 | 72.8 ± 10.8 | 1:14 | 1.9 ± 3.3 | 11.3 ± 6.1 | 8/15 (53.3%) |
| Grade 2 | 23 | 68.2 ± 11.9 | 2:21 | 1.0 ± 2.4 | 6.3 ± 6.2 | 11/23 (47.8%) |
| Grade 3 | 5 | 74.4 ± 10.0 | 2:3 | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 7.7 ± 4.8 | 4/5 (80.0%) |
| Grade 4 | 3 | 83.0 ± 6.5 | 0:3 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 2/3 (66.7%) |
| Total | 231 | 66.6 ± 12.6 | 42:189 | 2.1 ± 2.7 | 11.3 ± 7.0 | 92/231(39.8%) |
RSFR resting whole salivary flow rate (mL/15 min), SSFR stimulated whole salivary flow rate (mL/10 min); Values are mean ± SD
Prevalence of Candida colonization according to the severity of atrophic glossitis
| Atrophic glossitis | Detection of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Grade 0 | 76/185 | 30/185 | 16/185 | 5/185 | 14/185 |
| Grade 1 | 13/15 | 4/15 | 3/15 | 0/15 | 0/15 |
| Grade 2 | 22/23 | 11/23 | 1/23 | 4/23 | 3/23 |
| Grade 3 | 5/5 | 2/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Grade 4 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 1/3 |
| Total | 119/231 | b50/231 | 20/231 | 9/231 | 18/231 |
aThe culture test was positive in 135/231 (58.4%) patients. Values are number of cases
b C. albicans and C. glabrata were simultaneously detected in 41 cases
Comparison of variables between absent (Grade 0) and present (Grade1~4) groups of atrophic glossitis
| Atrophic glossitis |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 0 | Grade 1~4 | ||
|
|
| ||
|
| 35.2 ± 92.3 | 255.6 ± 750.0 | <0.001 |
|
| 45.8 ± 278.7 | 37.9 ± 115.2 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.6 ± 5.8 | 3.9 ± 18.6 | 0.058 |
|
| 0.9 ± 6.3 | 0.3 ± 1.2 | 0.974 |
| RSFR (mL/15 min) | 2.4 ± 2.7 | 1.3 ± 2.6 | <0.001 |
| SSFR (mL/10 min) | 12.2 ± 6.9 | 7.9 ± 6.4 | <0.001 |
| Age | 65.4 ± 12.5 | 71.4 ± 12.0 | 0.004 |
Values are expressed as Mean ± SD. P-value, Mann-Whitney U-test
RSFR resting whole salivary flow rate, SSFR stimulated whole salivary flow rate
Comparison of gender and denture-wearing status between absent (Grade 0) and present (Grade1~4) groups of atrophic glossitis
| Atrophic glossitis | Total |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 0 | Grade 1~4 | ||||
| Gender | Male | 37 | 5 | 42 | 0.221 |
| Female | 148 | 41 | 189 | ||
| Total | 185 | 46 | 231 | ||
| Denture | Wearing | 67 | 25 | 92 | 0.025 |
| No dentures | 118 | 21 | 139 | ||
| Total | 185 | 46 | 231 | ||
Values are number of cases. P-value, Chi square test
RSFR resting whole salivary flow rate, SSFR stimulated whole salivary flow rate
Correlations among amount of Candida species, age, and salivary flow rate
|
|
|
|
| RSFR | SSFR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.296** | 0.288** | 0.175** | 0.155* | −0.210** | −0.099 |
|
| 0.345** | 0.157* | 0.039 | −0.430** | −0.351** | |
|
| 0.189** | 0.246** | −0.320** | −0.269** | ||
|
| 0.178** | −0.248** | −0.278** | |||
|
| −0.079 | −0.031 | ||||
| RSFR | 0.701** | |||||
| SSFR |
Values represent Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001
RSFR resting whole salivary flow rate, SSFR stimulated whole salivary flow rate
Predictors of atrophic glossitis -Multivariate logistic regression analysis-
| Coefficient |
| Odds ratio |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Age | 0.029 | 0.135 | 1.029 | 0.991 | 1.069 |
| Gender | 0.804 | 0.196 | 2.234 | 0.661 | 7.549 |
|
| 0.004 | 0.004 | 1.004 | 1.001 | 1.007 |
|
| −0.001 | 0.366 | 0.999 | 0.996 | 1.001 |
|
| 0.015 | 0.353 | 1.015 | 0.983 | 1.048 |
|
| −0.055 | 0.581 | 0.946 | 0.778 | 1.151 |
| RSFR (mL/15 min) | 0.045 | 0.675 | 1.047 | 0.846 | 1.295 |
| SSFR (mL/10 min) | −0.085 | 0.048 | 0.919 | 0.845 | 0.999 |
| Denture | 0.364 | 0.389 | 1.439 | 0.629 | 3.294 |
| Constant | −3.752 | 0.010 | 0.023 | ||
RSFR resting whole salivary flow rate, SSFR stimulated whole salivary flow rate
Gender; female: 1, male: 0, Denture; denture wearing: 1, no dentures: 0
Fig. 2The associations between salivation and denture-wearing status and C. albicans colonization. The patients were divided into four groups according to their salivation status (normosalivation [Normo; SSFR >10 mL/10 min] or hyposalivation [Hypo; SSFR ≤10 mL/10 min]) and denture-wearing status (denture wearing or no dentures). The bar graph shows the C. albicans colony-forming units (CFU) stratified by salivation and denture-wearing statuses. The columns show the means. The Kruskal-Wallis H test, followed by multiple comparison testing using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction, was used to test statistical significance