Literature DB >> 22437681

Multi-species biofilm of Candida albicans and non-Candida albicans Candida species on acrylic substrate.

Apurva K Pathak1, Sanjay Sharma, Pallavi Shrivastva.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In polymicrobial biofilms bacteria extensively interact with Candida species, but the interaction among the different species of the Candida is yet to be completely evaluated. In the present study, the difference in biofilm formation ability of clinical isolates of four species of Candida in both single-species and multi-species combinations on the surface of dental acrylic resin strips was evaluated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The species of Candida, isolated from multiple species oral candidiasis of the neutropenic patients, were used for the experiment. Organisms were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose broth with 8% glucose (SDB). Biofilm production on the acrylic resins strips was determined by crystal violet assay. Student's t-test and ANOVA were used to compare in vitro biofilm formation for the individual species of Candida and its different multi-species combinations.
RESULTS: In the present study, differences between the mean values of the biofilm-forming ability of individual species (C. glabrata>C. krusei>C. tropicalis>C. albicans) and in its multi-species' combinations (the highest for C. albicans with C. glabrata and the lowest for all the four species combination) were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study showed that biofilm-forming ability was found greater for non-Candida albicans Candida species (NCAC) than for C. albicans species with intra-species variation. Presence of C. albicans in multi-species biofilms increased, whereas; C. tropicalis decreased the biofilm production with all other NCAC species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22437681      PMCID: PMC3928775          DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000100013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci        ISSN: 1678-7757            Impact factor:   2.698


INTRODUCTION

Candida is the most frequently isolated fungal pathogen in humans causing a variety of afflictions ranging from superficial mucosal infections to systemic mycoses. Oral fungal infections develop frequently in immunocompromised patients, particularly in patients with prolonged, severe neutropenic episodes[2]. In vivo studies indicate that microbial contamination of denture acrylic resin occurs quite rapidly and implanted devices like denture prostheses provide refuge to candidal organisms as either single-species or multi-species biofilms[5,13]. Consequently, the immunocompromised denture wearers are more prone to the fungal infections. One of the major factors contributing to the virulence of Candida is its ability in acclimatize to a variety of different habitats for growth and formation of surface-attached microbial communities known as "biofilms". Biofilms are defined as microbial communities encased in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), which display phenotypic features that differ from their planktonic or free-floating counterparts[7,16,19]. In vitro studies indicate that microbial contamination of denture acrylic resin occurs quite rapidly and the yeast cells adhere strongly to denture materials[4,13,18]. As bacteria and non-Candida albicans Candida species are often found with Candida albicans in polymicrobial biofilms in vivo, it is likely that extensive interspecies interactions take place in these adherent populations[16,17,19]. A large number of in vitro model systems have been used to investigate characteristics of single-species and mixed-species biofilms consisting of C. albicans and bacteria[1,3,10,11,12,17]. Some studies have also been done on the interaction between different species of Candida on in vitro dual-species biofilm formation[20,25]. The study on the interaction between different species of Candida on in vitro multi-species biofilm formation is still scarce[27]. In the present study, the differences in biofilm-forming ability of clinical isolates of four species of Candida in single-species and multi-species combination on the surface of dental acrylic resin strips, commonly used for dental appliances, was evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Organisms

The test organisms included 24 isolates of 4 different species of Candida i.e. C. albicans, C. kruzi, C. glabrata and C. tropicalis (six isolates of each), isolated from the oral lesions of multiple species (≥2 Candida species) Oropharyngeal Candidiasis (OPC) of the neutropenic patients (absolute neutrophil count <1.5×109 cells/L)[28]. Pure culturing and identification was done at the Department of Microbiology, Modern Dental College and Research Centre. The identification of Candida species was conducted by culture characteristics on HiChrome Candida agar medium (HiMedia, Mumbai, India), assessing germ tube, chlamydospore formation and sugar assimilation patterns[6,22].

Simulated acrylic resins plates fabrication

Thirty-six square acrylic resins (polymethylmethacrylate) strips of 10x10x3 mm were fabricated. The acrylic resins strips were prepared as described by Samaranayake and MacFarlane[21] (1980) with some modifications. Wax patterns were invested in denture flasks, boiled out, packed with the denture base resins, and heat polymerized according to manufacturer instructions at a temperature 73ºC for 6 h. Strips were removed from flask after bench cooling. One surface of strips was polished on buff wheel with pumice slurry. Other surface was left untouched to simulate intaglio surface. The resultant acrylic resins strips were immersed in distilled water for 1 week to leach excess monomer. Following this strips were disinfected by dipping in 70 % alcohol for 1 min, washed with sterile distilled water, dried and used for the experiment after checking their sterility.

Determination of biofilm production

Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB) prepared from powdered Sabouraud broth (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) supplemented with 60 g of glucose per liter (final glucose concentration, 80 g/liter or 8%) (Qualigens, Navi Mumbai, India), was according to manufacturer's instructions. Fresh pure cultures of testing organism were prepared on SDA medium by subculturing clinical isolate. A loop full of organisms from each SDA plate was inoculated into modified Sabouraud dextrose broth (8% of glucose concentration) for 24 h at 35±2ºC. The turbidity of each suspension was adjusted to the equivalent of 1x107 CFU/mL with SDB as determined by comparative plate counts. Next, 1 mL of suspension of isolated species and testing combination of different species was prepared by mixing equal volume of tested species, inoculated into a test tube with a screw cap (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) containing 9 mL of SDB, to make the final turbidity of each suspension to 1x106 CFU/mL. Strips were placed in SDB, and then incubated at 35±2ºC for 24 h without agitation. After 24 h of incubation, the culture broth in the tube was aspirated gently, and then acrylic strips were taken out for further investigation. The acrylic resins strips, on which biofilms developed, were washed once with distilled water, and then incubated in a crystal violet (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) staining solution (0.1% in distilled water) for 15 min. These were then washed three times with distilled water. The stain was then dissolved in de-staining solution (95% ethanol) and absorbance in terms of optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm as previously described[15]. Untreated acrylic strips were used as a control for the amount of the crystal violet stain in the de-staining solution. The absorbance values of controls were subtracted from the test values to minimize background interference.

Statistical analysis

The ODs of the amount of the crystal violet in the de-staining solution, measured for different Candida species, were compared by the paired Student's t-test by using the SPSS Win 12.0 program (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences between the isolated species and its multi-species combinations were considered to be significant for P of 0.05. The null hypothesis (HO) rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis (H1) at significance level α (0.05) if; T>tn-1, α/2 (value of the Student table with n -1 degrees of freedom). The null hypothesis is H0: δ=0 (there is no difference in biofilm formation ability among the tested species) and the alternative hypothesis is (was) H1: δ=0 (there is a difference in biofilm formation ability among the tested species).

RESULTS

Twenty-four Candida species isolated from clinical samples and were used for this study. Amongst the 24 isolates, 6 each of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis were used to test the biofilm formation ability both in single-species and in multi-species combination. All the isolates produce moderate to high degree of biofilms on the surface of acrylic material (Figure 1). The biofilm-forming ability of C. glabrata were reported to be the highest on acrylic substances (OD - 0.3833±0.02066), whereas; of C. albicans to be the lowest (OD - 0.1467±0.01366). In case of multiple species conditions, it was observed that the C. albicans had a positive impact on biofilms formation on acrylic substances as the highest degree of slim production occurred when C. albicans were inoculated with C. glabrata (OD- 0.7850±0.03209); whereas C. krusei had a negative impact in combination. Under multiple species condition when all the four species were in inoculums, the biofilms forming activity were severely hampered (OD - 0.1133±0.01033).
Figure 1

Optical Density of de-staining solution #

Optical Density of de-staining solution # # OD., Optical Density; A., C. albicans; T., C. tropicalis; K., C. krusei; G., C. glabrata; +, Combination of tested species To test the hypothesis of no difference or no relationship between biofilm-forming ability of isolated species with that of in-combination of other species, paired t-test was performed (Table 1). For all the four species, 7 different multi-species combinations were prepared, which made a total of 39 pairs. Eighty-five percent of the pairs rejected null hypothesis in favor of alternate hypothesis. Only 15% of pairs showed no difference between the mean values of the biofilm-forming ability of single-species and in its multi-species combination.
Table 1

Paired samples t-test of Candida species combinations$

Pairst-testSignificance level (2-tailed)Decision (α=0.05)
Pair 1A - A+T-5,4520,003Significant
Pair 2A - A+K-6,9280,001Significant
Pair 3A - A+G-65,110Significant
Pair 4A - A+K+G-2,9070,034Significant
Pair 5A - A+T+K-2,6970,043Significant
Pair 6A - A+T+G-31,550Significant
Pair 7A - A+T+K+G5,4230,003Significant
Pair 8T - A+T-4,4430,007Significant
Pair 9T - T+G5,4770,003Significant
Pair 10T - T+K10,363Non-significant
Pair 11T - A+T+K01Non-significant
Pair 12T - A+T+G-29,390Significant
Pair 13T - T+K+G0,8890,415Non-significant
Pair 14T - A+T+K+G8,3670Significant
Pair 15K - A+K-3,5030,017Significant
Pair 16K - K+G8,730Significant
Pair 17K - T+K4,3920,007Significant
Pair 18K - A+K+G2,1690,082Non-significant
Pair 19K - A+T+K70,001Significant
Pair 20K - T+K+G50,004Significant
Pair 21K - A+T+K+G8,9190Significant
Pair 22G - A+G-32,850Significant
Pair 23G - K+G27,5680Significant
Pair 24G - T+G21,4220Significant
Pair 25G - A+K+G20,6840Significant
Pair 26G - A+T+G-1,0250,352Non-significant
Pair 27G - T+K+G37,9970Significant
Pair 28G - A+T+K+G60,3740Significant
Pair 29A+T – (A,T)5,270,003Significant
Pair 30A+K – (A,K)5,9660,002Significant
Pair 31A+G – (A,G)50,7470Significant
Pair 32K+G – (K,G)-23,950Significant
Pair 33T+G – (T,G)-16,840Significant
Pair 34T+K – (T,K)-3,8410,012Significant
Pair 35A+K+G – (A,K,G)-11,870Significant
Pair 36A+T+K – (A,T,K)0,1830,862Non-significant
Pair 37A+T+G – (A,T,G)16,0210Significant
Pair 38 T+K+G – (T,K,G)-30,620Significant
Pair 39A+T+K+G – (A,T,K,G)-25,850Significant

C. albicans; T., C. tropicalis; K., C. krusei; G., C. glabrata; +, Combination of tested species; (,),Average of the biofilm-forming ability of tested species independently.

Paired samples t-test of Candida species combinations$ C. albicans; T., C. tropicalis; K., C. krusei; G., C. glabrata; +, Combination of tested species; (,),Average of the biofilm-forming ability of tested species independently.

DISCUSSION

In patients with advanced immunodeficiency, mucosal infections can lead to severe oral and esophageal candidiasis, resulting in disseminated candidiasis and sometimes early death. One of the most important virulence factors of Candida species is its ability to form biofilms, which has an important clinical consequence, as it confers resistance to antifungal therapy and capacity for yeast cells within the biofilms to withstand host immune defenses[3,5,6,12,19]. Changes in the oral environment effected by tooth loss or denture wearing can cause changes in oral microflora. The carriage rates of single and multiple Candida species were reported to be significantly higher in denture wearers[11]. In the light of above fact Candida, isolated from multiple species candidimia lesion, were evaluated for their biofilms formation ability on acrylic surface in vitro, in single-species and multi-species combination. Candida biofilms formation has been described on polymethylmethacrylate strips which occur essentially in three overlapping phases: early (0-11 h), intermediate (12-30 h), and maturation (38-72 h) phases. The early stage is characterized by adherence and development of blastospores into distinct microcolonies. By 18 to 24 h, the Candida biofilm community can be seen as a bilayered structure comprising a mixture of yeasts, germ tubes, and young hyphae; this intermediate phase is distinguished by the production of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). During maturation, the biofilms becomes a thick EPS layer in which a dense network of yeasts, pseudohyphae, and hyphae are embedded[4,18]. The biofilm-forming ability of clinical isolates of C. albicans, C. krusei, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata recovered from multiple species candidimia lesions, was evaluated by measuring absorbance of the de-staining solution containing crystal violet dye (crystal violet assay). The present showed C. glabrata forming thickest slim layer on acrylic resins strip followed by C. krusei, C. tropicalis and C. albicans, contrasting with the findings of previous researchers[9,24]. However Silva, et al.[23] (2009) reported that C. glabrata biofilms matrix was high in both protein and carbohydrates, which that probably enabled it to adsorbed more amount of crystal violet contents. Shin, et al.[22] (2002) observed that biofilm formation was most frequent for isolates of C. tropicalis (80%), followed by C. parapsilosis (73%), C. glabrata (28%), and C. albicans (8%). This finding contrasts with the present adhesion studies, probably due to the sources of isolates. Different strains of the same Candida species were found to be different in their ability to form biofilms was also reported in this study, indicating "strong" and "weak" biofilms-forming strains might exist within each Candida species[26]. Shin, et al.[22] (2002) also reported that biofilms-forming ability was greater for NCAC than for albicans species using similar protocol. Presence of one species of microorganism on a surface can promote the adhesion of another[14]. Thein, et al.[25] (2007) reported competitive interaction in a dual-species biofilms of C. albicans and C. krusei; whereas Pereira-Cenci, et al.[20] (2008) did not report competitive interaction in a dual-species biofilms of C. albicans and C. glabrata. In the present study, the highest degree of slim production was seen with the combination of C. albicans and C. glabrata, followed by the combination of C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata, and the lowest slim production was seen with the multi-species biofilms of all the four species of Candida. Presence of C. albicans in multi-species biofilms increased the production of slim when inoculated with all other NCAC species; whereas C. tropicalis retarded the production of slim under multi-species condition except with C. albicans. In this way, C. albicans might be able to successfully provide a substratum to the NCAC species on the acrylic prosthesis. One of the most significant features of microbial biofilms is its resistance to a variety of antimicrobial agents. Studies have demonstrated drug resistance when Candida biofilms are even grown on surfaces like denture acrylic. The possible mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents are: restricted penetration of drugs through the biofilms matrix; phenotypic switching, surface-induced expression of resistance genes and a small number of "persistent" cells[8]. Presence of two or more species in a biofilm could aggregate these factors. Synergistic effects of these factors can pose major problems to the clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, biofilm-forming ability was found greater for NCAC than for albicans species, isolated from multi-species oral candidiasis of the neutropenic patients. Presence of C. albicans in multi-species biofilms increased the slim production with all other NCAC species, whereas C. tropicalis impeded the production of slim under multi-species condition except for C. albicans.
  25 in total

1.  Medical importance of biofilms in Candida infections.

Authors:  L Julia Douglas
Journal:  Rev Iberoam Micol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.044

Review 2.  Community lifestyle of Candida in mixed biofilms: a mini review.

Authors:  Z M Thein; C J Seneviratne; Y H Samaranayake; L P Samaranayake
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.377

3.  An in-vitro study of the adherence of Candida albicans to acrylic surfaces.

Authors:  L P Samaranayake; T W MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.633

4.  Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance.

Authors:  J Chandra; D M Kuhn; P K Mukherjee; L L Hoyer; T McCormick; M A Ghannoum
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Biofilm production by isolates of Candida species recovered from nonneutropenic patients: comparison of bloodstream isolates with isolates from other sources.

Authors:  Jong Hee Shin; Seung Jung Kee; Myung Geun Shin; Soo Hyun Kim; Dong Hyeon Shin; Sang Ku Lee; Soon Pal Suh; Dong Wook Ryang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis: comparison of biofilm formation in terms of biomass and activity.

Authors:  M Henriques; J Azeredo; R Oliveira
Journal:  Br J Biomed Sci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 7.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms that lead to Candida biofilm formation.

Authors:  J M ten Cate; F M Klis; T Pereira-Cenci; W Crielaard; P W J de Groot
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  In vitro Candida colonization on acrylic resins and denture liners: influence of surface free energy, roughness, saliva, and adhering bacteria.

Authors:  Tatiana Pereira-Cenci; Tatiana Pereira; Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury; Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci; Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues-Garcia
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

9.  The effect of Streptococcus mutans and Candida glabrata on Candida albicans biofilms formed on different surfaces.

Authors:  Tatiana Pereira-Cenci; Dong Mei Deng; Eefje Anne Kraneveld; Erik Martinus Marie Manders; Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury; Jacob Martien Ten Cate; Wim Crielaard
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.633

Review 10.  Development of Candida-associated denture stomatitis: new insights.

Authors:  Tatiana Pereira-Cenci; Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury; Wim Crielaard; Jacob Martien Ten Cate
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

View more
  17 in total

1.  High-throughput screening of multispecies biofilm formation and quantitative PCR-based assessment of individual species proportions, useful for exploring interspecific bacterial interactions.

Authors:  Dawei Ren; Jonas Stenløkke Madsen; Claudia I de la Cruz-Perera; Lasse Bergmark; Søren J Sørensen; Mette Burmølle
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Susceptibility of multispecies biofilm to photodynamic therapy using Photodithazine®.

Authors:  Cristiane Campos Costa Quishida; Juliana Cabrini Carmello; Ewerton Garcia de Oliveira Mima; Vanderlei Salvador Bagnato; Ana Lúcia Machado; Ana Cláudia Pavarina
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Relative Abundances of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata in In Vitro Coculture Biofilms Impact Biofilm Structure and Formation.

Authors:  Michelle L Olson; Arul Jayaraman; Katy C Kao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Repeated applications of photodynamic therapy on Candida glabrata biofilms formed in acrylic resin polymerized.

Authors:  Lírian Silva de Figueiredo Freitas; Rodnei Dennis Rossoni; Antonio Olavo Cardoso Jorge; Juliana Campos Junqueira
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Candida Resistance to Antimycotics and Promising Ways to Overcome It: The Role of Probiotics.

Authors:  Konstantin A Demin; Aleksandr G Refeld; Anna A Bogdanova; Evgenya V Prazdnova; Igor V Popov; Olga Yu Kutsevalova; Alexey M Ermakov; Anzhelica B Bren; Dmitry V Rudoy; Vladimir A Chistyakov; Richard Weeks; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 6.  Candida albicans biofilms and polymicrobial interactions.

Authors:  Nicole O Ponde; Léa Lortal; Gordon Ramage; Julian R Naglik; Jonathan P Richardson
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 7.624

7.  Use of alcohol vinegar in the inhibition of Candida spp. and its effect on the physical properties of acrylic resins.

Authors:  Ricardo Dias de Castro; Ana Carolina Loureiro Gama Mota; Edeltrudes de Oliveira Lima; André Ulisses Dantas Batista; Julyana de Araújo Oliveira; Alessandro Leite Cavalcanti
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Competitive Interactions between C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. krusei during Biofilm Formation and Development of Experimental Candidiasis.

Authors:  Rodnei Dennis Rossoni; Júnia Oliveira Barbosa; Simone Furgeri Godinho Vilela; Jéssica Diane dos Santos; Patrícia Pimentel de Barros; Márcia Cristina de Azevedo Prata; Ana Lia Anbinder; Beth Burgwyn Fuchs; Antonio Olavo Cardoso Jorge; Eleftherios Mylonakis; Juliana Campos Junqueira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Heparin-benzyl alcohol enhancement of biofilms formation and antifungal susceptibility of vaginal Candida species isolated from pregnant and nonpregnant Saudi women.

Authors:  Raid A Al-Akeel; Talat A El-Kersh; Yazeed A Al-Sheikh; Ziab Zakey Al-Ahmadey
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2013-04-13

10.  Assessment of Antifungal Activity of Bakuchiol on Oral-Associated Candida spp.

Authors:  Mohd-Al-Faisal Nordin; Fathilah Abdul Razak; Wan Harun Himratul-Aznita
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.