| Literature DB >> 29246138 |
Peter Amwoga Ayeka1,2, YuHong Bian3, Peter Mwitari Githaiga1,4, Ying Zhao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has kindled the need for scientific evaluation of the mechanism of action of CAMs. Although, licorice, a common ingredient in many Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has attracted great attention for its antitumor and immunomodulatory activities, the mechanism of action of its polysaccharides is still unclear. Here we report the immunomodulatory activity of licorice polysaccharides in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: Anticancer; Immunomodulation; Licorice; Polysaccharides; Tumor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29246138 PMCID: PMC5732493 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-2030-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Effect of licorice polysaccharides on weight of mice and tumor suppression
| Treatment Group | Mice with tumor(g) | Tumor weight(g) | Mice without | Tumor suppression (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 20.56 ± 1.3 | 0 | 20.56 ± 1.3 | – |
| Saline | 23.48 ± 2.7 | 7.41 ± 0.4 | 16.07 ± 2.3* | – |
| Cytoxin | 23.51 ± 3.2 | 5.05 ± 1.1# | 18.46 ± 2.1 | 31.85 |
| Fraction A | 25.60 ± 2.4* | 7.31 ± 0.9 | 18.32 ± 1.5 | 1.35 |
| Fraction B | 25.03 ± 4.3* | 5.96 ± 0.8# | 19.07 ± 3.5 | 19.57 |
| Fraction C | 24.74 ± 2.5 | 6.59 ± 1.0 | 18.19 ± 1.5 | 11.07 |
Data represented as mean ± SD, n = 10. *p < 0.05 versus Normal group; # p < 0.05, versus Saline group
Effect of Licorice polysaccharide on immune organs index
| Index | Normal | Saline | Cytoxin | Fraction A | Fraction B | Fraction C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spleen mg | 80 ± .002 | 220 ± .015 | 160 ± .028 | 200 ± .010 | 250 ± .029* | 190 ± .014 |
| Thymusmg | 26.63 ± 2.10 | 9.87 ± .66 | 10.2 ± .71 | 13.56 ± .54 | 15.42 ± .44* | 13.67 ± .53 |
| Spleen index | .004 ± .00 | .009 ± .00 | .007 ± .00 | .008 ± .00 | .010 ± .00 | .008 ± .00 |
| Thymus index | 1.29 ± .26 | .423 ± .08 | .433 ± .06 | .532 ± .06 | .637 ± .14* | .555 ± .07 |
Data expressed as mean ± SD.*p < 0.05 versus saline group. n = 10
Effect of Licorice polysaccharides on T lymphocyte population
| TT Cells, % | Normal | Saline | Cytoxin | FractionA | Fraction B | Fraction C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD4+ | 79.82 ± 1.1* | 72.76 ± 2.3# | 75.74 ± 4.7# | 77.61 ± 0.3* | 78.70 ± 3.4* | 71.20 ± .9# |
| CD8+ | 18.55 ± 0.9* | 25.98 ± 2.4# | 19.62 ± 4.1* | 21.25 ± 0.3* | 20.44 ± 3.2* | 27.05 ± .6# |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. *p ˂ 0.05, versus Saline group; # p < 0.05 versus Normal group, n = 10
Fig. 1Dot plots for representative treatment groups of Normal, Saline, Fraction A, Fraction B and Fraction C after treatment period. To determine immune activity of licorice polysaccharides on proliferation T lymphocytes through stimulation, flow cytometry assay was carried out. Whole blood was collected by retro-orbital puncture and stained with respective markers, CD3, CD4 and CD8. Normal group had a high percentage of CD4 and low CD8; Cytoxin group, high CD4 and low CD8; Fraction A, high CD4 and low CD8; Fraction B, high CD4 and low CD8 and Fraction C, low CD4 and high CD8 cells compared to Saline treated group
Fig. 2Effect of Licorice polysaccharides on cytokine serum levels. Interleukin 2,6,7,10,15, 17 and TNFα. After treatment period, mice were sacrificed and cytokine levels measured by magnetic bead panel assay. Data represented as mean ± S.D. *p˂0.05 versus the Saline group, # p˂0.05 versus Normal groups