Tatenda Mahlokozera1, Ananth K Vellimana1, Tiandao Li2, Diane D Mao1, Zohny S Zohny1, David H Kim1, David D Tran3, Daniel S Marcus4, Sarah J Fouke5, Jian L Campian6, Gavin P Dunn1,6,7,8, Christopher A Miller2, Albert H Kim1,6,9,10. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 2. McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 3. Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida. 4. Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, St Luke's Hospital, St Louis, Missouri. 6. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 7. Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 8. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 9. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 10. Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
Background: Diagnostic workflows for glioblastoma (GBM) patients increasingly include DNA sequencing-based analysis of a single tumor site following biopsy or resection. We hypothesized that sequencing of multiple sectors within a given tumor would provide a more comprehensive representation of the molecular landscape and potentially inform therapeutic strategies. Methods: Ten newly diagnosed, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) wildtype GBM tumor samples were obtained from 2 (n = 9) or 4 (n = 1) spatially distinct tumor regions. Tumor and matched blood DNA samples underwent whole-exome sequencing. Results: Across all 10 tumors, 51% of mutations were clonal and 3% were subclonal and shared in different sectors, whereas 46% of mutations were subclonal and private. Two of the 10 tumors exhibited a regional hypermutator state despite being treatment naïve, and remarkably, the high mutational load was predominantly limited to one sector in each tumor. Among the canonical cancer-associated genes, only telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations were observed in the founding clone in all tumors. Reconstruction of the clonal architecture in different sectors revealed regionally divergent evolution, and integration of data from 2 sectors increased the resolution of inferred clonal architecture in a given tumor. Predicted therapeutic mutations differed in presence and frequency between tumor regions. Similarly, different sectors exhibited significant divergence in the predicted neoantigen landscape. Conclusions: The substantial spatial heterogeneity observed in different GBM tumor sectors, especially in spatially restricted hypermutator cases, raises important caveats to our current dependence on single-sector molecular information to guide either targeted or immune-based treatments.
Background: Diagnostic workflows for glioblastoma (GBM) patients increasingly include DNA sequencing-based analysis of a single tumor site following biopsy or resection. We hypothesized that sequencing of multiple sectors within a given tumor would provide a more comprehensive representation of the molecular landscape and potentially inform therapeutic strategies. Methods: Ten newly diagnosed, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) wildtype GBM tumor samples were obtained from 2 (n = 9) or 4 (n = 1) spatially distinct tumor regions. Tumor and matched blood DNA samples underwent whole-exome sequencing. Results: Across all 10 tumors, 51% of mutations were clonal and 3% were subclonal and shared in different sectors, whereas 46% of mutations were subclonal and private. Two of the 10 tumors exhibited a regional hypermutator state despite being treatment naïve, and remarkably, the high mutational load was predominantly limited to one sector in each tumor. Among the canonical cancer-associated genes, only telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations were observed in the founding clone in all tumors. Reconstruction of the clonal architecture in different sectors revealed regionally divergent evolution, and integration of data from 2 sectors increased the resolution of inferred clonal architecture in a given tumor. Predicted therapeutic mutations differed in presence and frequency between tumor regions. Similarly, different sectors exhibited significant divergence in the predicted neoantigen landscape. Conclusions: The substantial spatial heterogeneity observed in different GBM tumor sectors, especially in spatially restricted hypermutator cases, raises important caveats to our current dependence on single-sector molecular information to guide either targeted or immune-based treatments.
Authors: Brett E Johnson; Tali Mazor; Chibo Hong; Michael Barnes; Koki Aihara; Cory Y McLean; Shaun D Fouse; Shogo Yamamoto; Hiroki Ueda; Kenji Tatsuno; Saurabh Asthana; Llewellyn E Jalbert; Sarah J Nelson; Andrew W Bollen; W Clay Gustafson; Elise Charron; William A Weiss; Ivan V Smirnov; Jun S Song; Adam B Olshen; Soonmee Cha; Yongjun Zhao; Richard A Moore; Andrew J Mungall; Steven J M Jones; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Nobuhito Saito; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Akitake Mukasa; Mitchel S Berger; Susan M Chang; Barry S Taylor; Joseph F Costello Journal: Science Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Qianghu Wang; Baoli Hu; Xin Hu; Hoon Kim; Massimo Squatrito; Lisa Scarpace; Ana C deCarvalho; Sali Lyu; Pengping Li; Yan Li; Floris Barthel; Hee Jin Cho; Yu-Hsi Lin; Nikunj Satani; Emmanuel Martinez-Ledesma; Siyuan Zheng; Edward Chang; Charles-Etienne Gabriel Sauvé; Adriana Olar; Zheng D Lan; Gaetano Finocchiaro; Joanna J Phillips; Mitchel S Berger; Konrad R Gabrusiewicz; Guocan Wang; Eskil Eskilsson; Jian Hu; Tom Mikkelsen; Ronald A DePinho; Florian Muller; Amy B Heimberger; Erik P Sulman; Do-Hyun Nam; Roel G W Verhaak Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Chris Hunter; Raffaella Smith; Daniel P Cahill; Philip Stephens; Claire Stevens; Jon Teague; Chris Greenman; Sarah Edkins; Graham Bignell; Helen Davies; Sarah O'Meara; Adrian Parker; Tim Avis; Syd Barthorpe; Lisa Brackenbury; Gemma Buck; Adam Butler; Jody Clements; Jennifer Cole; Ed Dicks; Simon Forbes; Matthew Gorton; Kristian Gray; Kelly Halliday; Rachel Harrison; Katy Hills; Jonathon Hinton; Andy Jenkinson; David Jones; Vivienne Kosmidou; Ross Laman; Richard Lugg; Andrew Menzies; Janet Perry; Robert Petty; Keiran Raine; David Richardson; Rebecca Shepherd; Alexandra Small; Helen Solomon; Calli Tofts; Jennifer Varian; Sofie West; Sara Widaa; Andy Yates; Douglas F Easton; Gregory Riggins; Jennifer E Roy; Kymberly K Levine; Wolf Mueller; Tracy T Batchelor; David N Louis; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Richard Wooster Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler Journal: Science Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Cyriac Kandoth; Michael D McLellan; Fabio Vandin; Kai Ye; Beifang Niu; Charles Lu; Mingchao Xie; Qunyuan Zhang; Joshua F McMichael; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Mark D M Leiserson; Christopher A Miller; John S Welch; Matthew J Walter; Michael C Wendl; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Benjamin J Raphael; Li Ding Journal: Nature Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Alex H Wagner; Adam C Coffman; Benjamin J Ainscough; Nicholas C Spies; Zachary L Skidmore; Katie M Campbell; Kilannin Krysiak; Deng Pan; Joshua F McMichael; James M Eldred; Jason R Walker; Richard K Wilson; Elaine R Mardis; Malachi Griffith; Obi L Griffith Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Jasreet Hundal; Beatriz M Carreno; Allegra A Petti; Gerald P Linette; Obi L Griffith; Elaine R Mardis; Malachi Griffith Journal: Genome Med Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Jakub Litak; Cezary Grochowski; Joanna Litak; Ida Osuchowska; Krzysztof Gosik; Elżbieta Radzikowska; Piotr Kamieniak; Jacek Rolinski Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Gavin P Dunn; Timothy F Cloughesy; Marcela V Maus; Robert M Prins; David A Reardon; Adam M Sonabend Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Rimas V Lukas; Derek A Wainwright; Erik Ladomersky; Sean Sachdev; Adam M Sonabend; Roger Stupp Journal: Oncology (Williston Park) Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 2.990
Authors: Joseph H McAbee; Charlotte Degorre-Kerbaul; Kristin Valdez; Astrid Wendler; Uma T Shankavaram; Colin Watts; Kevin Camphausen; Philip J Tofilon Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 4.130