Literature DB >> 29242635

MYD88 mutations predict unfavorable prognosis in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia patients with mutated IGHV gene.

Shu-Chao Qin1, Yi Xia1, Yi Miao1, Hua-Yuan Zhu1, Jia-Zhu Wu1, Lei Fan1, Jian-Yong Li2, Wei Xu3, Chun Qiao4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29242635      PMCID: PMC5802429          DOI: 10.1038/s41408-017-0014-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cancer J        ISSN: 2044-5385            Impact factor:   11.037


× No keyword cloud information.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia in adults in the Western countries but is relatively rare in East Asia[1]. CLL is a disease of high heterogeneity. The clinical course ranges from indolence to rapid progression to death. Although the Rai and Binet clinical staging systems remain to be the cornerstone for CLL prognosis, the rapidly developed biological and genetic techniques enable the detection of novel prognostic factors. Mutations in myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88) in CLL were first reported in 2011 with a mutation frequency of 9/310 (2.9%)[2]. Subsequent studies found that MYD88 mutations exist in 2.0–4.4% Caucasian patients with CLL[3-7]. However, subjects of Asia showed a higher MYD88 mutated rate of 8% as previously reported[8]. The above MYD88 mutated cases consist mainly of a p. L265P substitution. CLL patients with MYD88 mutations were reported to be younger at diagnosis and have longer time to treatment (TTT) and overall survival (OS) than those with wild-type MYD88[9]. However, this conclusion was controversial[10]. Initial studies indicated that most MYD88-mutated patients belonged to the IGHV-mutated group[5,9,11], which is generally accepted as a molecular sign of favorable prognosis. These studies could be more convincing if taking IGHV mutation status and MYD88 mutations together into prognostic consideration[10]. In the current study, we analyzed MYD88 mutations exclusively in the IGHV-mutated CLL cases to explore its prognostic value. Two hundred and eighty-four patients with previously untreated CLL at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between January 2000 and June 2016 were retrospectively enrolled. All cases were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis according to the 2008 International Workshop in CLL-National Cancer Institute (IWCLL-NCI)[12]. Clinical and biological parameters including absolute lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, platelet, cytogenetic abnormalities, mutation status of TP53, IGHV, NOTCH1 as well as surface markers of CLL cells were assessed at first presence at our center. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University with a reference number as 2014-SR-204. Informed consents were provided according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Mononuclear cells from 281 peripheral blood samples and three bone marrow samples of untreated CLL patients were used for AS-PCR assay. Genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Blood Kits (Qiagen, Düsseldorf, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Two different forward primers (FW5′-GTGCCCATCAGAAGCGCCT-3′ and FM5′-GTGCCCATCAGAAGCGCCC-3′) and one reverse primer (5′-AGGAGGCAGGGCAGAAGTA-3′) were used to amplify the wild-type allele or the MYD88 L265P mutation allele as previously reported[4]. The sensitivity of AS-PCR was 0.625% in the present study. The Sanger sequencing was performed to confirm the AS-PCR assay and to detect MYD88 mutations other than L265P. Exon 3–5 was amplified by Sanger sequencing with a forward primer (5′- AGCGACATCCAGTTTGTGC-3′) and a reverse primer (5′- AGGCGAGTCCAGAACCAAG -3′)[8]. Amplified fragments were sequenced with both the forward and reverse primers. Both detecting methods were applied on all samples included in the study. All statistical analyses were performed by SPSS for Windows (version 19.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and Graphpad Prism 6. Fisher’s exact test and the chi-square test were used to determine the correlations between MYD88 mutations and clinical characteristics. Mann-Whitney U test was applied for comparing mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) as a continuous parameter in MYD88 mutated and wild-type groups. Time to treatment (TTT) was defined as the time from initial diagnosis to first treatment. OS was defined as the time from diagnosis to death or to the last follow-up. TTT and OS curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The prognostic impact of MYD88 mutations on TTT and OS was assessed using both univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided, and P value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. A total of 284 CLL patients were included in our study. Clinical and biological characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median proportion of CD19+CD5+ cells in the samples was 65.3% (range 32.3–98.1%). Using both AS-PCR and Sanger sequencing, we detected MYD88 mutations (n = 25) in 25/284 (8.8%) patients with the hotspot L265P substitution representing 72.0% (18/25) of all mutations. Other detected mutations were all single-nucleotide substitutions including S219C (n = 3), V217F (n = 2), M232T (n = 1) and S243N (n = 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of the CLL patients according to MYD88 mutation status

All (n = 284)MYD88 wild type (n = 259)MYD88 mutated (n = 25)
Characteristicn*%n*%n*% P
Age, y (range)60 (54–69)60 (54–69)60 (54–66)0.512
Male18364.416463.31976.00.275
Binet C8632.17731.3940.90.351
IGHV mutated16559.114356.32288.00.002
CD38 ≥ 30%5218.85220.600.00.011
ZAP70 ≥ 20%7128.76629.1525.00.802
TP53 disruption6222.55823.0416.70.613
HBV ( + )6221.95420.8833.30.195
 + 124218.04018.929.50.383
ATM deletion3717.13015.2736.80.026
NOTCH1 177.5178.100.00.373

*Median and 25th–75th percentiles are reported for continuous variables

Characteristics of the CLL patients according to MYD88 mutation status *Median and 25th–75th percentiles are reported for continuous variables Patients with MYD88 mutations preferentially carried mutated IGHV genes (MYD88 mutated: 22/25 vs. MYD88 wild-type: 143/254, P = 0.001). None of the MYD88 mutated CLL patients showed CD38 positivity (defined as ≥30%) (P = 0.011). Besides, MYD88 mutated CLL were more frequently ATM-deleted (36.8%, P = 0.026). In addition, we observed lower CD200 MFI in MYD88 mutated CLL patients (P < 0.001) within both the overall cohort and CLL patients with mutated IGHV. None of the mutated patients had Ig paraproteinemia in our analysis. No difference was observed in the distribution of TP53 disruptions between MYD88 wild-type and mutated subjects in the mutated IGHV-CLL (referred as M-CLL) (19 vs. 14%, P = 0.767). With a median follow-up of 54.5 months, MYD88 mutations showed no significant impact on either TTT or OS (Figs. 1a, b). Then we conducted survival analysis in the M-CLL patients. Variables included in the univariate analysis on TTT were: (1) conventional clinical (Binet staging system) factors; (2) widely accepted genetic (TP53 disruption, defined as TP53 mutation and/or deletion, NOTCH1 mutation ATM deletion and 12 trisomy) prognostic risk factors; 3) specific protein expression (CD38 and ZAP70). Univariate Cox analysis selected MYD88 mutation (HR 1.873; 95% CI 1.067-3.287; P = 0.029), Binet C (HR 3.617; 95% CI 2.278-5.742; P < 0.001) and TP53 disruption (HR 1.798; 95% CI 1.090-2.966; P = 0.022) as risk factors for shorter TTT, and these three parameters went for multivariate analysis in the next step. Multivariate analysis confirmed MYD88 mutations (HR 2.233; 95% CI 1.233-4.045; P = 0.008) alongside with Binet C (HR 3.653; 95% CI 2.244-5.944; P < 0.001) were independently correlated with shorter TTT (Table 2 and Fig. 1c) in M-CLL patients. However, no difference on OS was observed between MYD88-mutated and -unmutated cases in the same cohort (P = 0.593) (Fig. 1d).
Fig. 1

a Kaplan-Meier estimates of TTT according to MYD88 mutation status among all patients. Time to treatment analysis according to MYD88 mutation status in the CLL patients (N = 284). MYD88 wild-type cases (MYD88 (-)) are represented by the red line. MYD88 mutated cases (MYD88 ( + )) are represented by the blue line. b Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS according to MYD88 mutation status among all patients. Overall survival analysis according to MYD88 mutation status in the CLL patients (N = 284). MYD88 wild-type cases (MYD88 (-)) are represented by the red line. MYD88 mutated cases (MYD88 ( + )) are represented by the blue line. c Kaplan-Meier estimates of TTT according to MYD88 mutation status and IGHV mutation status among M-CLL patients. Time to treatment analysis according to MYD88 mutation status and IGHV mutation status among all CLL patients (N = 284). Of the M-CLL cases, MYD88 wild-type cases (IGHV ( + ) MYD88 (-)) are represented by the red line, while MYD88 mutated cases (IGHV ( + ) MYD88 ( + )) are represented by the blue line. IGHV unmutated cases (IGHV(-)) are represented by the green line. d Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS according to MYD88 mutation status among M-CLL patients. Overall survival analysis according to MYD88 mutation status in the M-CLL patients (N = 165). MYD88 wild-type cases (IGHV ( + ) MYD88 (-)) are represented by the red line. MYD88 mutated cases (IGHV ( + ) MYD88 ( + )) are represented by the blue line

Table 2

Univariate and Multivariate analysis for time to treatment in the M-CLL patients

Risk FactorsUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
HR95%CI P HR95%CI P
MYD88 mutation1.8731.067-3.2870.0292.2331.233-4.0450.008
Binet C3.6172.278-5.742 < 0.0013.6532.244-5.944 < 0.001
TP53 disruption1.7981.090-2.9660.0221.4540.861-2.4550.162
ZAP70 ≥ 30%1.0040.616-1.6370.988---
CD38 ≥ 20%1.1390.638-2.0330.659---
NOTCH1 mutation2.6690.651-10.9460.173---
 + 121.0210.547-1.9080.948---
ATM deletion1.8300.886-3.7790.102---

HR hazards ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval;

a Kaplan-Meier estimates of TTT according to MYD88 mutation status among all patients. Time to treatment analysis according to MYD88 mutation status in the CLL patients (N = 284). MYD88 wild-type cases (MYD88 (-)) are represented by the red line. MYD88 mutated cases (MYD88 ( + )) are represented by the blue line. b Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS according to MYD88 mutation status among all patients. Overall survival analysis according to MYD88 mutation status in the CLL patients (N = 284). MYD88 wild-type cases (MYD88 (-)) are represented by the red line. MYD88 mutated cases (MYD88 ( + )) are represented by the blue line. c Kaplan-Meier estimates of TTT according to MYD88 mutation status and IGHV mutation status among M-CLL patients. Time to treatment analysis according to MYD88 mutation status and IGHV mutation status among all CLL patients (N = 284). Of the M-CLL cases, MYD88 wild-type cases (IGHV ( + ) MYD88 (-)) are represented by the red line, while MYD88 mutated cases (IGHV ( + ) MYD88 ( + )) are represented by the blue line. IGHV unmutated cases (IGHV(-)) are represented by the green line. d Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS according to MYD88 mutation status among M-CLL patients. Overall survival analysis according to MYD88 mutation status in the M-CLL patients (N = 165). MYD88 wild-type cases (IGHV ( + ) MYD88 (-)) are represented by the red line. MYD88 mutated cases (IGHV ( + ) MYD88 ( + )) are represented by the blue line Univariate and Multivariate analysis for time to treatment in the M-CLL patients HR hazards ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; We further analyzed the correlation between MYD88 mutations and 6 mostly used IGHV genes in M-CLL patients. None of the MYD88 mutated cases used IGHV4-34, the most prevalent IGHV gene in the M-CLL cohort, (P = 0.015) (Table 3), suggesting that MYD88 mutation might be IGHV gene-biased, and that certain antigen exposure might avoid the emergence of MYD88 mutations in the pathogenesis of CLL.
Table 3

The correlation of MYD88 mutation and 6 mostly used IGHV gene in M-CLL patients in China

AllMYD88-wildMYD88-mutatedP value
n%nn
VH4-34 0.015
yes2816.7280
no14083.311723
VH3-23 0.484
yes2011.9164
no14888.112919
VH3-7 0.484
yes2011.9164
no14888.112919
VH4-39 1.000
yes53.050
no16397.014023
VH4-59 0.526
yes53.041
no16397.014122
VH3-21 0.448
yes42.431
no16497.614222
The correlation of MYD88 mutation and 6 mostly used IGHV gene in M-CLL patients in China In this study, we explored the detection method and clinical relevance of MYD88 mutations in Chinese patients with CLL. We found MYD88 mutations: (1) occur in 8.8% CLL patients in our center upon diagnosis; (2) cluster with cases harboring mutated IGHV; (3) identify a group of patients with poor prognosis among M-CLL; (4) are rare, if not absent, in IGHV-4-34 users. The incidence of MYD88 mutations was 2.0–4.4% in Caucasian CLL patients[3-5]. However, we have detected a higher frequency of 8.8% in our cohort upon diagnosis. The disparities of ethnic groups may explain the difference in frequencies; meanwhile the application of AS-PCR assay in our study indeed improved the detection sensitivity. AS-PCR is previously used in detecting MYD88 L265P mutations in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia and diffused large B cell lymphoma[3,13,14]. Our data showed that AS-PCR is capable of detecting samples with a tumor cell load as low as 0.625%, which is far beyond the sensitivity of Sanger sequencing. The role of MYD88 mutations in determining the biological features and clinical outcome of CLL patients remains controversial. The initial study indicated that patients with MYD88 mutations were diagnosed younger and suffered a moreless advanced clinical stage[9]. Contradictory results, however, were observed in that MYD88 mutations showed no age and stage preference in CLL patients[7,11], nor does our data do. In the subgroup analysis of M-CLL, we observed MYD88 mutations predict shorter TTT in this category with favorable outcome. Furthermore, CLL patients with MYD88 mutations had comparable prognosis with those with unmutated IGHV in our cohort, implying MYD88 mutations may counteract the survival advantage of mutated IGHV gene. Early research has shown that CLL cells with MYD88 mutation co-immunoprecipitates with a larger amount of IRAK1&IL-1/TLR signaling pathway, and that activation of the IL-1/TLR pathway promotes proliferation in CLL cells[15]. Furthermore, MYD88 mutated CLL cells have higher phosphorylation and more DNA-binding activity in NF-κB subunits than CLL cells with wild-type MYD88. All these results suggests MYD88 mutation is a gain-of-function molecular change which may aberrantly activates NF-κB signaling pathway in CLL cells[2,9] and offers explanation for the unfavorable prognostic impact of MYD88 mutation on the M-CLL subgroup. We also found patients with MYD88 mutations have a relatively lower CD200 MFI compared to the wildtype cases do, consistent with a previous report[16]. Along with the fact that none of the MYD88 mutated CLL patients expressed positive CD38 in our study, we postulate that this subgroup of CLL patients may have a distinct immunophenotype from CLL without MYD88 mutations. This will be further explored by targeted RNA sequencing and whole genome sequencing. MYD88 mutations are mutually exclusive of IGHV 4-34 gene usage, which was not shown before to our knowledge. Unlike previously reported, we did not observe a preferable IGHV 3-23 gene usage in MYD88-mutated cases[10]. In conclusion, in our cohort of newly diagnosed CLL patients, MYD88 mutations showed an incidence of 8.8%, including 6.3% on the hotspot missense mutation L265P. MYD88 mutations predict unfavorable prognosis within the M-CLL subgroup.
  16 in total

1.  Oncogenically active MYD88 mutations in human lymphoma.

Authors:  Vu N Ngo; Ryan M Young; Roland Schmitz; Sameer Jhavar; Wenming Xiao; Kian-Huat Lim; Holger Kohlhammer; Weihong Xu; Yandan Yang; Hong Zhao; Arthur L Shaffer; Paul Romesser; George Wright; John Powell; Andreas Rosenwald; Hans Konrad Muller-Hermelink; German Ott; Randy D Gascoyne; Joseph M Connors; Lisa M Rimsza; Elias Campo; Elaine S Jaffe; Jan Delabie; Erlend B Smeland; Richard I Fisher; Rita M Braziel; Raymond R Tubbs; J R Cook; Denny D Weisenburger; Wing C Chan; Louis M Staudt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  B Eichhorst; T Robak; E Montserrat; P Ghia; P Hillmen; M Hallek; C Buske
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Prognostic relevance of MYD88 mutations in CLL: the jury is still out.

Authors:  Panagiotis Baliakas; Anastasia Hadzidimitriou; Andreas Agathangelidis; Davide Rossi; Lesley-Ann Sutton; Jana Kminkova; Lydia Scarfo; Sarka Pospisilova; Gianluca Gaidano; Kostas Stamatopoulos; Paolo Ghia; Richard Rosenquist
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  SF3B1 mutations correlated to cytogenetics and mutations in NOTCH1, FBXW7, MYD88, XPO1 and TP53 in 1160 untreated CLL patients.

Authors:  S Jeromin; S Weissmann; C Haferlach; F Dicker; K Bayer; V Grossmann; T Alpermann; A Roller; A Kohlmann; T Haferlach; W Kern; S Schnittger
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Allele-specific PCR is a powerful tool for the detection of the MYD88 L265P mutation in diffuse large B cell lymphoma and decalcified bone marrow samples.

Authors:  Annette M Staiger; M Michaela Ott; Stefani Parmentier; Andreas Rosenwald; German Ott; Heike Horn; Ernst-Ulrich Griese
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Authors:  Xose S Puente; Magda Pinyol; Víctor Quesada; Laura Conde; Gonzalo R Ordóñez; Neus Villamor; Georgia Escaramis; Pedro Jares; Sílvia Beà; Marcos González-Díaz; Laia Bassaganyas; Tycho Baumann; Manel Juan; Mónica López-Guerra; Dolors Colomer; José M C Tubío; Cristina López; Alba Navarro; Cristian Tornador; Marta Aymerich; María Rozman; Jesús M Hernández; Diana A Puente; José M P Freije; Gloria Velasco; Ana Gutiérrez-Fernández; Dolors Costa; Anna Carrió; Sara Guijarro; Anna Enjuanes; Lluís Hernández; Jordi Yagüe; Pilar Nicolás; Carlos M Romeo-Casabona; Heinz Himmelbauer; Ester Castillo; Juliane C Dohm; Silvia de Sanjosé; Miguel A Piris; Enrique de Alava; Jesús San Miguel; Romina Royo; Josep L Gelpí; David Torrents; Modesto Orozco; David G Pisano; Alfonso Valencia; Roderic Guigó; Mónica Bayés; Simon Heath; Marta Gut; Peter Klatt; John Marshall; Keiran Raine; Lucy A Stebbings; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell; Ivo Gut; Armando López-Guillermo; Xavier Estivill; Emili Montserrat; Carlos López-Otín; Elías Campo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  MYD88 L265P in Waldenström macroglobulinemia, immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy, and other B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders using conventional and quantitative allele-specific polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Lian Xu; Zachary R Hunter; Guang Yang; Yangsheng Zhou; Yang Cao; Xia Liu; Enrica Morra; Alessandra Trojani; Antonino Greco; Luca Arcaini; Marzia Varettoni; Maria Varettoni; Jennifer R Brown; Yu-Tzu Tai; Kenneth C Anderson; Nikhil C Munshi; Christopher J Patterson; Robert J Manning; Christina K Tripsas; Neal I Lindeman; Steven P Treon
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Prevalence and clinical significance of the MYD88 (L265P) somatic mutation in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia and related lymphoid neoplasms.

Authors:  Marzia Varettoni; Luca Arcaini; Silvia Zibellini; Emanuela Boveri; Sara Rattotti; Roberta Riboni; Alessandro Corso; Ester Orlandi; Maurizio Bonfichi; Manuel Gotti; Cristiana Pascutto; Silvia Mangiacavalli; Giorgio Croci; Valeria Fiaccadori; Lucia Morello; Maria Luisa Guerrera; Marco Paulli; Mario Cazzola
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines.

Authors:  Michael Hallek; Bruce D Cheson; Daniel Catovsky; Federico Caligaris-Cappio; Guillaume Dighiero; Hartmut Döhner; Peter Hillmen; Michael J Keating; Emili Montserrat; Kanti R Rai; Thomas J Kipps
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Waldenström macroglobulinemia with extramedullary involvement at initial diagnosis portends a poorer prognosis.

Authors:  Xin Cao; Qing Ye; Robert Z Orlowski; Xiaoxiao Wang; Sanam Loghavi; Meifeng Tu; Sheeba K Thomas; Jatin Shan; Shaoying Li; Muzaffar Qazilbash; C Cameron Yin; Donna Weber; Roberto N Miranda; Zijun Y Xu-Monette; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Ken H Young
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 17.388

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  MYD88 Mutations: Transforming the Landscape of IgM Monoclonal Gammopathies.

Authors:  Miguel Alcoceba; María García-Álvarez; Alejandro Medina; Rebeca Maldonado; Verónica González-Calle; María Carmen Chillón; María Eugenia Sarasquete; Marcos González; Ramón García-Sanz; Cristina Jiménez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  MYD88 in the driver's seat of B-cell lymphomagenesis: from molecular mechanisms to clinical implications.

Authors:  Ruben A L de Groen; Anne M R Schrader; Marie José Kersten; Steven T Pals; Joost S P Vermaat
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nina Kreuzberger; Johanna Aag Damen; Marialena Trivella; Lise J Estcourt; Angela Aldin; Lisa Umlauff; Maria Dla Vazquez-Montes; Robert Wolff; Karel Gm Moons; Ina Monsef; Farid Foroutan; Karl-Anton Kreuzer; Nicole Skoetz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-31

4.  [Prognostic significance of CLL-IPI for Chinese patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia].

Authors:  H Y Zhu; L Wang; J Qiao; Y X Zou; Y Xia; W Wu; L Cao; J H Liang; L Fan; W Xu; J Y Li
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2018-05-14

5.  Assessment of the clinical utility of four NGS panels in myeloid malignancies. Suggestions for NGS panel choice or design.

Authors:  Almudena Aguilera-Diaz; Iria Vazquez; Beñat Ariceta; Amagoia Mañú; Zuriñe Blasco-Iturri; Sara Palomino-Echeverría; María José Larrayoz; Ramón García-Sanz; María Isabel Prieto-Conde; María Del Carmen Chillón; Ana Alfonso-Pierola; Felipe Prosper; Marta Fernandez-Mercado; María José Calasanz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Clinicopathological characterization of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with MYD88 mutations: L265P and non-L265P mutations are associated with different features.

Authors:  Wen Shuai; Pei Lin; Paolo Strati; Keyur P Patel; Mark J Routbort; Shimin Hu; Peng Wei; Joseph D Khoury; M James You; Sanam Loghavi; Zhenya Tang; Hong Fang; Beenu Thakral; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Wei Wang
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 11.037

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.