Jeremie Calais1, Wolfgang P Fendler2,3, Ken Herrmann2,3, Matthias Eiber2, Francesco Ceci2. 1. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and jcalais@mednet.ucla.edu. 2. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Abstract
This was a head-to-head comparison between 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 and 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in a series of 10 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence. Methods: In total, 288 patients with PCa recurrence were enrolled in a prospective study of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging for recurrent disease localization (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02940262). We retrospectively identified 10 patients who underwent clinically indicated 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT prior to enrollment. Results: The median time between the 2 scans was 2.2 mo (range, 0.2-4.2 mo). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was 1.0 ng/mL (mean, 4.7 ng/mL; range, 0.13-18.1 ng/mL) and 1.1 ng/mL (mean, 6.2 ng/mL; range, 0.24-31.3 ng/mL) at the time of 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, respectively. Five of 10 patients (50%) were negative with 18F-fluciclovine but positive with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Two of 10 patients (20%) were positive with both 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, but 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT showed additional lymph nodes metastasis. Three of 10 patients (30%) were negative with both 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Conclusion: This case series suggests improved detection rates for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT when compared with 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in patients with recurrent PCa. Prospective trials designed to directly compare the two should be initiated.
This was a head-to-head comparison between 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 and 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in a series of 10 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence. Methods: In total, 288 patients with PCa recurrence were enrolled in a prospective study of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging for recurrent disease localization (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02940262). We retrospectively identified 10 patients who underwent clinically indicated 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT prior to enrollment. Results: The median time between the 2 scans was 2.2 mo (range, 0.2-4.2 mo). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was 1.0 ng/mL (mean, 4.7 ng/mL; range, 0.13-18.1 ng/mL) and 1.1 ng/mL (mean, 6.2 ng/mL; range, 0.24-31.3 ng/mL) at the time of 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, respectively. Five of 10 patients (50%) were negative with 18F-fluciclovine but positive with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Two of 10 patients (20%) were positive with both 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, but 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT showed additional lymph nodes metastasis. Three of 10 patients (30%) were negative with both 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Conclusion: This case series suggests improved detection rates for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT when compared with 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in patients with recurrent PCa. Prospective trials designed to directly compare the two should be initiated.
Authors: Frédéric Bois; Camille Noirot; Sébastien Dietemann; Ismini C Mainta; Thomas Zilli; Valentina Garibotto; Martin A Walter Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-12-15
Authors: Francesco Ceci; Lorenzo Bianchi; Marco Borghesi; Giulia Polverari; Andrea Farolfi; Alberto Briganti; Riccardo Schiavina; Eugenio Brunocilla; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Shaojun Zhu; Nader Hirmas; Jeremie Calais; Matthias Eiber; Boris Hadaschik; Martin Stuschke; Ken Herrmann; Johannes Czernin; Amar U Kishan; Nicholas G Nickols; David Elashoff; Wolfgang P Fendler Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Jeremie Calais; Francesco Ceci; Matthias Eiber; Thomas A Hope; Michael S Hofman; Christoph Rischpler; Tore Bach-Gansmo; Cristina Nanni; Bital Savir-Baruch; David Elashoff; Tristan Grogan; Magnus Dahlbom; Roger Slavik; Jeannine Gartmann; Kathleen Nguyen; Vincent Lok; Hossein Jadvar; Amar U Kishan; Matthew B Rettig; Robert E Reiter; Wolfgang P Fendler; Johannes Czernin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Esther Mena; Peter C Black; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Michael Gorin; Mohamad Allaf; Peter Choyke Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.226