Literature DB >> 2924230

Physicians' participation in establishing criteria for hypertension management in the office: will patient outcomes be improved?

R W Putnam1, L Curry.   

Abstract

We designed this study to determine whether an intensive 1-day educational workshop involving family physicians in establishing essential criteria for hypertension management would significantly affect the short-term outcomes of hypertensive patients in their practices. Forty randomly selected physicians were separated into three groups: those who would be involved in establishing the criteria (15), those who would receive the criteria by mail (15) and those who would act as controls and not be aware of the criteria (10). We found no significant difference between the three groups in the number of hypertensive patients whose condition remained uncontrolled after the intervention. We conclude that physicians' participation in the establishment of standards of care for conditions such as hypertension or their awareness of such standards does not independently result in significantly better patient outcomes. Consequently, we recommend that physicians and health care planners concerned with improving outcomes not rely on any single intervention strategy when planning change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2924230      PMCID: PMC1268807     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  11 in total

1.  Effectiveness of continuing medical education: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J S Lloyd; S Abrahamson
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Physicians' management of hypertension: a randomized controlled CME trial.

Authors:  D S Gullion; J M Tschann; T E Adamson
Journal:  Res Med Educ       Date:  1987

3.  Concurrent quality assurance in hospital care. Report of a study by Private Initiative in PSRO.

Authors:  P J Sanazaro; R M Worth
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-05-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  The evaluation of continuing medical education: a literature review.

Authors:  D A Bertram; P A Brooks-Bertram
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1977

5.  A practice-based CME program in hypertension using a medication and behavioral treatment approach.

Authors:  D S Gullion; T E Adamson
Journal:  Res Med Educ       Date:  1985

6.  Does a mailed continuing education program improve physician performance? Results of a randomized trial in antihypertensive care.

Authors:  C E Evans; R B Haynes; N J Birkett; J R Gilbert; D W Taylor; D L Sackett; M E Johnston; S A Hewson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986 Jan 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Educational package on hypertension for primary care physicians.

Authors:  C E Evans; R B Haynes; J R Gilbert; D W Taylor; D L Sackett; M Johnston
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Improving physician performance through peer comparison feedback.

Authors:  R N Winickoff; K L Coltin; M M Morgan; R C Buxbaum; G O Barnett
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Testing an outcome-based quality assurance strategy in primary care.

Authors:  A I Mushlin; F A Appel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Impact of patient care appraisal on physician behaviour in the office setting.

Authors:  R W Putnam; L Curry
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for future studies: a systematic review of educational interventions in primary care settings.

Authors:  U Freudenstein; A Howe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

Review 3.  Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  D A Davis; A Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Human immunodeficiency virus risk awareness. Evaluation of a CME program for family physicians.

Authors:  F Martin; P Murphy
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice.

Authors:  A D Oxman; M A Thomson; D A Davis; R B Haynes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  [Control of arterial hypertension: effectiveness of an intervention performed by family practitioners].

Authors:  M Aubin; L Vézina; J Maziade; N M Robitaille
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Impact of performance improvement continuing medical education on cardiometabolic risk factor control: the COSEHC initiative.

Authors:  JaNae Joyner; Michael A Moore; Debra R Simmons; Brian Forrest; Kristina Yu-Isenberg; Ron Piccione; Kirt Caton; Daniel T Lackland; Carlos M Ferrario
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  The hypertension management program: identifying opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  Susan K Maue; James H Jackson; Bruce A Weiss; Marc L Rivo; Vishu Jhaveri; Barbara Lennert
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.