Literature DB >> 29241596

Essentials of Statistical Methods for Assessing Reliability and Agreement in Quantitative Imaging.

Arash Anvari1, Elkan F Halpern2, Anthony E Samir2.   

Abstract

Quantitative imaging is increasing in almost all fields of radiological science. Modern quantitative imaging biomarkers measure complex parameters including metabolism, tissue microenvironment, tissue chemical properties or physical properties. In this paper, we focus on measurement reliability assessment in quantitative imaging. We review essential concepts related to measurement such as measurement variability and measurement error. We also discuss reliability study methods for intraobserver and interobserver variability, and the applicable statistical tests including: intraclass correlation coefficient, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman graphs and limits of agreement, standard error of measurement, and coefficient of variation.
Copyright © 2018 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bland-Altman graph; Measurement error; agreement; coefficient of variation; intraclass correlation coefficient; reliability; standard error of measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29241596      PMCID: PMC5834361          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  22 in total

Review 1.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Laurent Audigé; Stig Brorson; Allan Donner; Byron J Gajewski; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Chris Roberts; Mohamed Shoukri; David L Streiner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables.

Authors:  J W Bartlett; C Frost
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).

Authors:  Nicholas P Lucas; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Nikolai Bogduk
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Reliability of Shear-Wave Elastography Estimates of the Young Modulus of Tissue in Follicular Thyroid Neoplasms.

Authors:  Arash Anvari; Manish Dhyani; Antonia E Stephen; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS).

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Byron J Gajewski; David L Streiner
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.837

7.  The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer.

Authors:  C G Moertel; J A Hanley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Statistical methods used to test for agreement of medical instruments measuring continuous variables in method comparison studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rafdzah Zaki; Awang Bulgiba; Roshidi Ismail; Noor Azina Ismail
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Understanding Bland Altman analysis.

Authors:  Davide Giavarina
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.313

View more
  9 in total

1.  How to improve precision and reliability of diaphragm ultrasonographic measurements in newborns.

Authors:  Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena; Ignacio Oulego-Erroz
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Repeatability of Ultrasound-Defined Bladder Shape Metrics in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Kaitlyn M Maddra; Rui Li; Anna S Nagle; Adam P Klausner; John E Speich
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Non-enhanced ultrasound is not a satisfactory modality for measuring necrotic ablated volume after radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules: a comparison with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Lin Yan; Yukun Luo; Jing Xiao; Lin Lin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Defining the Path Forward for Biomarkers to Address Unmet Needs in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Authors:  Gerard Honig; Caren Heller; Andrés Hurtado-Lorenzo
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 5.  How Accurately Can Prostate Gland Imaging Measure the Prostate Gland Volume? Results of a Systematic Review.

Authors:  David R H Christie; Christopher F Sharpley
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2019-03-03

Review 6.  How Replicates Can Inform Potential Users of a Measurement Procedure about Measurement Error: Basic Concepts and Methods.

Authors:  Werner Vach; Oke Gerke
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22

7.  Collagen fiber features and COL1A1: are they associated with elastic parameters in breast lesions, and can COL1A1 predict axillary lymph node metastasis?

Authors:  Ying Jiang; Bo Wang; Jun Kang Li; Shi Yu Li; Rui Lan Niu; Nai Qin Fu; Jiao Jiao Zheng; Gang Liu; Zhi Li Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Quantitative shear wave elastography in primary invasive breast cancers, based on collagen-S100A4 pathology, indicates axillary lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Xin Wen; Xiwen Yu; Yuhang Tian; Zhao Liu; Wen Cheng; Hairu Li; Jia Kang; Tianci Wei; Shasha Yuan; Jiawei Tian
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-03

Review 9.  Variability and Standardization of Quantitative Imaging: Monoparametric to Multiparametric Quantification, Radiomics, and Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Akifumi Hagiwara; Shohei Fujita; Yoshiharu Ohno; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 10.065

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.