Literature DB >> 29241396

Critical Thresholds of Intracranial Pressure-Derived Continuous Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices for Outcome Prediction in Noncraniectomized Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Frederick A Zeiler1,2,3, Joseph Donnelly4, Peter Smielewski4, David K Menon1, Peter J Hutchinson4, Marek Czosnyka4,5.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare intracranial pressure (ICP)-derived cerebrovascular reactivity indices in their ability to predict six-month outcome, and to determine/compare critical thresholds related to outcome for each index in adult noncraniectomized traumatic brain injury (TBI). Using a retrospective cohort of nondecompressive craniectomy (non-DC) patients with TBI, we performed univariate and multi-variate binary logistic regression outcome analysis of: pressure reactivity index (PRx), pulse amplitude index (PAx), and a newly described index (RAC) calculated as the regression coefficient between ICP waveform amplitude and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Finally, we performed sequential chi-square threshold analysis for each index as it related to six-month binary outcomes. Outcome was assessed via dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS): (A) favorable (GOS 4 or 5) versus unfavorable (GOS 3 or less), (B) alive versus dead. There were 358 non-DC patients with TBI included in all aspects of the analysis. In an analysis of the entire recording period for all patients using univariate binary logistic regression, the areas under the curves (AUCs) for favorable versus unfavorable outcome were: PRx (0.573, p < 0.0001), PAx (0.606, p < 0.0001), and RAC (0.655, p < 0.0001). Similarly, the AUCs for alive versus dead outcome were: PRx (0.651, p < 0.0001), PAx (0.705, p < 0.0001), and RAC (0.722, p < 0.0001). RAC displayed superior AUC statistics compared with PRx and PAx, using both univariate and multi-variate regression. RAC displayed more stable critical thresholds related to six-month outcomes. Thresholds for both favorable versus unfavorable and alive versus dead outcomes for PRx, PAx, and RAC across the entire recording period were: +0.35 and +0.35, 0 and +0.25, -0.10 and -0.05, respectively. In non-DC patients with TBI, RAC appears to be superior to PRx and PAx in six-month outcome prediction, using both univariate and multi-variate logistic regression. Further, RAC displayed more stable critical thresholds associated with binary outcomes at six months. Further analysis of RAC in TBI is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICP index; autoregulation; outcome; thresholds

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29241396     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  31 in total

1.  Association between Cerebrovascular Reactivity Monitoring and Mortality Is Preserved When Adjusting for Baseline Admission Characteristics in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Study.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Ari Ercole; Erta Beqiri; Manuel Cabeleira; Eric P Thelin; Nino Stocchetti; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Diffuse Intracranial Injury Patterns Are Associated with Impaired Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Validation Study.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; François Mathieu; Miguel Monteiro; Ben Glocker; Ari Ercole; Erta Beqiri; Manuel Cabeleira; Nino Stocchetti; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Virginia Newcombe; David K Menon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  An active learning framework for enhancing identification of non-artifactual intracranial pressure waveforms.

Authors:  Murad Megjhani; Ayham Alkhachroum; Kalijah Terilli; Jenna Ford; Clio Rubinos; Julie Kromm; Brendan K Wallace; E Sander Connolly; David Roh; Sachin Agarwal; Jan Claassen; Raghav Padmanabhan; Xiao Hu; Soojin Park
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Cerebrovascular Consequences of Elevated Intracranial Pressure After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski; Leanne Alexis Calviello; Frederick A Zeiler; Joseph Donnelly; András Czigler; Andrea Lavinio; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2021

Review 5.  A Precision Medicine Approach to Cerebral Edema and Intracranial Hypertension after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Quo Vadis?

Authors:  Ruchira M Jha; Patrick M Kochanek
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Brain Tissue Oxygen and Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Exploratory Analysis of Insult Burden.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Erta Beqiri; Manuel Cabeleira; Peter J Hutchinson; Nino Stocchetti; David K Menon; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski; Ari Ercole
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Validation of Intracranial Pressure-Derived Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices against the Lower Limit of Autoregulation, Part II: Experimental Model of Arterial Hypotension.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Jennifer K Lee; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Ken Brady
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Paths to Successful Translation of New Therapies for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Golden Age of Traumatic Brain Injury Research: A Pittsburgh Vision.

Authors:  Patrick M Kochanek; Travis C Jackson; Ruchira M Jha; Robert S B Clark; David O Okonkwo; Hülya Bayır; Samuel M Poloyac; Amy K Wagner; Philip E Empey; Yvette P Conley; Michael J Bell; Anthony E Kline; Corina O Bondi; Dennis W Simon; Shaun W Carlson; Ava M Puccio; Christopher M Horvat; Alicia K Au; Jonathan Elmer; Amery Treble-Barna; Milos D Ikonomovic; Lori A Shutter; D Lansing Taylor; Andrew M Stern; Steven H Graham; Valerian E Kagan; Edwin K Jackson; Stephen R Wisniewski; C Edward Dixon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 9.  The Limited Impact of Current Therapeutic Interventions on Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Overview.

Authors:  Logan Froese; Carleen Batson; Alwyn Gomez; Josh Dian; Frederick A Zeiler
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 10.  Pathophysiology and treatment of cerebral edema in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ruchira M Jha; Patrick M Kochanek; J Marc Simard
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.