Literature DB >> 29241343

Can Biologic Augmentation Improve Clinical Outcomes Following Microfracture for Symptomatic Cartilage Defects of the Knee? A Systematic Review.

Armin Arshi1, Peter D Fabricant2, Derek E Go3, Riley J Williams2, David R McAllister1, Kristofer J Jones1.   

Abstract

Objective To perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes following microfracture augmented with biological adjuvants (MFX+) compared with microfracture (MFX) alone. Design The MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical studies on MFX+ for chondral defects of the knee. Study characteristics and clinical outcome score data were collected. Subjective synthesis was performed using data from randomized controlled studies to determine effect size of MFX+ procedures performed with either injectable or scaffold-based augmentation compared with MFX alone. Results A total of 18 articles reporting on 625 patients (491 MFX+, 134 MFX) were identified. Six studies were level II evidence and 1 study was level I evidence. Mean patient age range was 26 to 51 years, and mean follow-up ranged from 2 to 5 years. All studies demonstrated significant improvement in reported clinical outcome scores at follow-up after MFX+ therapy, and 87% of patients reported satisfaction with treatment. The most commonly reported treatment complication was postoperative stiffness (3.9% of patients). Subjective synthesis on randomized controlled trials demonstrated that 2/2 injectable MFX+ interventions had significantly greater improvements in International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC; P = 0.004) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS; P = 0.012) scores compared with MFX alone, while 2/2 trials on scaffolding MFX+ adjuvants showed comparable postoperative improvements. Conclusions MFX+ biological adjuvants are safe supplements to marrow stimulation for treating cartilage defects in the adult knee. Early literature is heterogenous and extremely limited in quality. Individual trials report both equivalent and superior clinical outcomes compared with MFX alone, making definitive conclusions on the efficacy of MFX+ difficult without higher quality evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  articular cartilage; biomaterials; marrow stimulation; microfracture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29241343      PMCID: PMC5871129          DOI: 10.1177/1947603517746722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   4.634


  48 in total

1.  Concentrated bone marrow aspirate improves full-thickness cartilage repair compared with microfracture in the equine model.

Authors:  Lisa A Fortier; Hollis G Potter; Ellen J Rickey; Lauren V Schnabel; Li Foong Foo; Leroy R Chong; Tracy Stokol; Jon Cheetham; Alan J Nixon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Andra Morrison; Julie Polisena; Don Husereau; Kristen Moulton; Michelle Clark; Michelle Fiander; Monika Mierzwinski-Urban; Tammy Clifford; Brian Hutton; Danielle Rabb
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 3.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Hema Mistry; Martin Connock; Joshua Pink; Deepson Shyangdan; Christine Clar; Pamela Royle; Rachel Court; Leela C Biant; Andrew Metcalfe; Norman Waugh
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 4.  High Variability in Outcome Reporting Patterns in High-Impact ACL Literature.

Authors:  Eric C Makhni; Ajay S Padaki; Petros D Petridis; Michael E Steinhaus; Christopher S Ahmad; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Enhanced microfracture techniques in cartilage knee surgery: Fact or fiction?

Authors:  Stefan Bark; Tomasz Piontek; Peter Behrens; Sabreen Mkalaluh; Deike Varoga; Justus Gille
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18

6.  Cartilage extra-cellular matrix biomembrane for the enhancement of microfractured defects.

Authors:  Jun Young Chung; Doo-hyung Lee; Tae Hun Kim; Kyu-Sung Kwack; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Byoung-Hyun Min
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Mid-term results of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for treatment of focal cartilage defects in the knee.

Authors:  J Gille; E Schuseil; J Wimmer; J Gellissen; A P Schulz; P Behrens
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Novel scaffold-based BST-CarGel treatment results in superior cartilage repair compared with microfracture in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  William D Stanish; Robert McCormack; Francisco Forriol; Nicholas Mohtadi; Stéphane Pelet; Jacques Desnoyers; Alberto Restrepo; Matthew S Shive
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  One-step cartilage repair in the knee: collagen-covered microfracture and autologous bone marrow concentrate. A pilot study.

Authors:  D Enea; S Cecconi; S Calcagno; A Busilacchi; S Manzotti; A Gigante
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Chondroinduction Is the Main Cartilage Repair Response to Microfracture and Microfracture With BST-CarGel: Results as Shown by ICRS-II Histological Scoring and a Novel Zonal Collagen Type Scoring Method of Human Clinical Biopsy Specimens.

Authors:  Caroline D Hoemann; Nicolas Tran-Khanh; Anik Chevrier; Gaoping Chen; Viorica Lascau-Coman; Colleen Mathieu; Adele Changoor; Alex Yaroshinsky; Robert G McCormack; William D Stanish; Michael D Buschmann
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  6 in total

1.  Microfracture for cartilage repair in the knee: current concepts and limitations of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Sang Jun Song; Cheol Hee Park
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

2.  Microfracture for the Treatment of Symptomatic Cartilage Lesions of the Knee: A Survey of International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society.

Authors:  Jesus Medina; Ignacio Garcia-Mansilla; Peter D Fabricant; Thomas J Kremen; Seth L Sherman; Kristofer Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis Versus Microfracture of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Jun-Ho Kim; Jae-Won Heo; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-11-04

Review 4.  Management of the Failed OCD.

Authors:  Crystal A Perkins; S Clifton Willimon
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-04

5.  Differences in the Demographics and Preferred Management of Knee Cartilage Injuries in Soccer Players Across FIFA Centers of Excellence.

Authors:  Niv Marom; Tyler Warner; Riley J Williams
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Surgical management of focal chondral defects of the knee: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Jörg Eschweiler; Hanno Schenker; Alice Baroncini; Markus Tingart; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.