Literature DB >> 29241244

Physician Beliefs about the Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record: A Follow-Up Study.

Srinivas Emani1, David Y Ting2, Michael Healey1,3, Stuart R Lipsitz1, Andrew S Karson4, David W Bates1,5.   

Abstract

Background There is continuing interest in how physicians are responding to the meaningful use of the electronic health record (EHR) incentive program. However, little research has been done on physician beliefs about the meaningful use of the EHR. Objective This study aims to conduct a follow-up study of physician beliefs about the meaningful use of the EHR. Methods Online survey of physicians at two academic medical centers (AMCs) in the northeast who were participating in the meaningful use of the EHR incentive program and were using an internally developed EHR was conducted. Results Of the 2,033 physicians surveyed, 1,075 completed the survey for an overall response rate of 52.9%. Only one-fifth (20.5%) of the physicians agreed or strongly agreed that meaningful use of the EHR would help them improve quality of care, and only a quarter (25.2%) agreed or strongly agreed that the meaningful use of the EHR would improve the care that their organization delivers. Physician satisfaction with the outpatient EHR was the strongest predictor of self-efficacy with achieving stage 2 of the meaningful use of the EHR incentive program (odds ratio: 2.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.61, 2.75, p < 0.001). Physicians reported more negative beliefs in stage 2 than stage 1 across all belief items. For example, 28.1% agreed or strongly agreed that the meaningful use of the EHR would decrease medical errors in stage 2 as compared with 35.9% in stage 1 (p < 0.001). Conclusion Only one-fifth of the physicians in our study believed that the meaningful use of the EHR would improve quality of care, patient-centeredness of care, or the care they personally provide. Primary care physicians expressed more negative beliefs about the meaningful use of the EHR in stage 2 than in stage 1. These findings show that physicians continue to express negative beliefs about the meaningful use of the EHR. These ongoing negative beliefs are concerning for both implementation and policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29241244      PMCID: PMC5802309          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2017-05-RA-0079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  26 in total

1.  Measuring meaningful use.

Authors:  Sean O Hogan; Stephanie M Kissam
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Linder; Jun Ma; David W Bates; Blackford Middleton; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-09

3.  Special requirements for electronic health record systems in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Michael V Boland; Allen Brewer; K David Epley; Mark B Horton; Michele C Lim; Colin A McCannel; Sayjal J Patel; David E Silverstone; Linda Wedemeyer; Flora Lum
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Making sense of meaningful use stage 2: second wave or tsunami?

Authors:  Jason Mitchell; Steven E Waldren
Journal:  Fam Pract Manag       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

5.  Physician beliefs about the impact of meaningful use of the EHR: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S Emani; D Y Ting; M Healey; S R Lipsitz; A S Karson; J S Einbinder; L Leinen; V Suric; D W Bates
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Patient experience should be part of meaningful-use criteria.

Authors:  James D Ralston; Katie Coleman; Robert J Reid; Matthew R Handley; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Physician adherence to preventive cardiology guidelines for women.

Authors:  Michael D Cabana; Catherine Kim
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

9.  Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: a survey of primary care providers.

Authors:  Anil N Makam; Holly J Lanham; Kim Batchelor; Lipika Samal; Brett Moran; Temple Howell-Stampley; Lynne Kirk; Manjula Cherukuri; Noel Santini; Luci K Leykum; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Stage 1 of the meaningful use incentive program for electronic health records: a study of readiness for change in ambulatory practice settings in one integrated delivery system.

Authors:  Christopher M Shea; Kristin L Reiter; Mark A Weaver; Molly McIntyre; Jason Mose; Jonathan Thornhill; Robb Malone; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  7 in total

1.  Horizontal and vertical integration's role in meaningful use attestation over time.

Authors:  Jordan Everson; Michael R Richards; Melinda B Buntin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Emergency Physicians' Perceived Influence of EHR Use on Clinical Workflow and Performance Metrics.

Authors:  Courtney A Denton; Hiral C Soni; Thomas G Kannampallil; Anna Serrichio; Jason S Shapiro; Stephen J Traub; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Factors That Influence Clinician Experience with Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Vimal Mishra; David Liebovitz; Michael Quinn; Le Kang; Thomas Yackel; Robert Hoyt
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2022-01-01

4.  Turning "Lose-Lose" into "Win-Win": What Is Good for Them Is Good for Us!

Authors:  Paul J Hershberger; Dean A Bricker; Katharine Conway; Morgan H Torcasio
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-03-30

5.  Observing Provider Utilization of Electronic Health Records to Improve Clinical Quality Metrics.

Authors:  Kevin Brooks; Molly Polverento; Laura Houdeshell-Putt; Erin Sarzynski; Sabrina Ford
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2022-01-01

6.  Determinants predicting the electronic medical record adoption in healthcare: A SEM-Artificial Neural Network approach.

Authors:  Amina Almarzouqi; Ahmad Aburayya; Said A Salloum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  OrderRex clinical user testing: a randomized trial of recommender system decision support on simulated cases.

Authors:  Andre Kumar; Rachael C Aikens; Jason Hom; Lisa Shieh; Jonathan Chiang; David Morales; Divya Saini; Mark Musen; Michael Baiocchi; Russ Altman; Mary K Goldstein; Steven Asch; Jonathan H Chen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.