Literature DB >> 2924082

Structure-activity relationships of new analogues of arecaidine propargyl ester at muscarinic M1 and M2 receptor subtypes.

U Moser1, G Lambrecht, M Wagner, J Wess, E Mutschler.   

Abstract

1. The potency of arecaidine propargyl ester (APE) and of several analogues containing a modified ester side chain has been assessed at M1 and M2 muscarinic receptor subtypes. APE was shown to act as a potent agonist at ganglionic M1 receptors in the pithed rat, at M2 receptors in guinea-pig isolated atria (-log EC50 = 8.22) and ileum (-log EC50 = 7.77). 2. The arecaidine 2-butynyl and 2-pentynyl esters were approximately equipotent with APE at M1 and M2 receptors, whereas the 2-hexynyl derivative was found to be less potent than APE in atria (-log EC50 = 6.80) and ileum (-log EC50 = 6.70) by about one order of magnitude. The 2-heptynyl and 3-phenyl propargyl esters exhibited no agonist actions in atria and ileum. 3. Shifting the triple bond from the 2 to the 3 position and introducing a bulky group at position 1 of the ester side chain of APE and analogues resulted in competitive antagonists (pA2 ranging from 4.9 to 7.3). 4. APE and its 2-butynyl analogue showed some agonistic selectivity for cardiac M2 receptors (potency ratio, ileum/atria = 2.8 and 4.6 respectively). All antagonists in this series of compounds were not selective in terms of affinity since their pA2 values at cardiac and ileal M2 receptors were similar (potency ratios, ileum/atria = 0.4 to 1.2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2924082      PMCID: PMC1854365          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb11820.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  15 in total

Review 1.  A MOLECULAR BASIS FOR DRUG ACTION.

Authors:  E J ARIUENS; A M SIMONIS
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 3.765

Review 2.  pA2 and receptor differentiation: a statistical analysis of competitive antagonism.

Authors:  R J Tallarida; A Cowan; M W Adler
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1979-08-20       Impact factor: 5.037

3.  Cholinergic and anticholinergic drugs, do they act on common receptors?

Authors:  E J Ariens; A M Simonis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1967-10-31       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Muscarinic receptor subtypes: a critique of the current classification and a proposal for a working nomenclature.

Authors:  R M Eglen; R L Whiting
Journal:  J Auton Pharmacol       Date:  1986-12

5.  Affinity, efficacy, and stereoselectivity of oxotremorine analogues for muscarinic receptors in the isolated guinea pig ileum.

Authors:  B Ringdahl; D J Jenden
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  Muscarinic receptor subtypes: M1 and M2 biochemical and functional characterization.

Authors:  R Hammer; A Giachetti
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1982-12-27       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  The relative potencies of some agonists at M2 muscarinic receptors in guinea-pig ileum, atria and bronchi.

Authors:  R B Barlow; P Weston-Smith
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  A comparison of the antimuscarinic effects of pirenzepine and N-methylatropine on ganglionic and vascular muscarinic receptors in the rat.

Authors:  J Wess; G Lambrecht; U Moser; E Mutschler
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1984-07-30       Impact factor: 5.037

9.  [Structure-activity relationships of unsaturated esters of arecaidine and dihydroarecaidine].

Authors:  E Mutschler; K Hultzsch
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1973-05

10.  Stereoselectivity of muscarinic receptors in vivo and in vitro for oxotremorine analogues. N-[4-(tertiary amino)-2-butynyl]-5-methyl-2-pyrrolidones.

Authors:  R Amstutz; B Ringdahl; B Karlén; M Roch; D J Jenden
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pharmacological characterization of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated Gq activation in rat cerebral cortical and hippocampal membranes.

Authors:  Yuji Odagaki; Masakazu Kinoshita; Ryoichi Toyoshima
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Selectivity profile of the novel muscarinic antagonist UH-AH 37 determined by the use of cloned receptors and isolated tissue preparations.

Authors:  J Wess; G Lambrecht; E Mutschler; M R Brann; F Dörje
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Cholinergic regulation of the evoked quantal release at frog neuromuscular junction.

Authors:  Eugeny E Nikolsky; Frantisek Vyskocil; Ella A Bukharaeva; Dmitry Samigullin; Lev G Magazanik
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Stereoselective inhibition of muscarinic receptor subtypes by the enantiomers of hexahydro-difenidol and acetylenic analogues.

Authors:  R Feifel; M Wagner-Röder; C Strohmann; R Tacke; M Waelbroeck; J Christophe; E Mutschler; G Lambrecht
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Novel pharmacological profile of muscarinic receptors mediating contraction of the guinea-pig uterus.

Authors:  F Dörje; T Friebe; R Tacke; E Mutschler; G Lambrecht
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Cracking the Betel Nut: Cholinergic Activity of Areca Alkaloids and Related Compounds.

Authors:  Nicole A Horenstein; Marta Quadri; Clare Stokes; Mohammed Shoaib; Roger L Papke
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Functional Characterization of Muscarinic Receptors in Human Schwann Cells.

Authors:  Roberta Piovesana; Alessandro Faroni; Ada Maria Tata; Adam J Reid
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.