Literature DB >> 2043926

Selectivity profile of the novel muscarinic antagonist UH-AH 37 determined by the use of cloned receptors and isolated tissue preparations.

J Wess1, G Lambrecht, E Mutschler, M R Brann, F Dörje.   

Abstract

1. Functional in vitro experiments were carried out to determine the antimuscarinic potencies of the pirenzepine derivative UH-AH 37 (6-chloro-5,10-dihydro-5-[(1-methyl-4-piperidinyl)acetyl]-11H-dibenzo- [b,e] [1,4] diazepine-11-one hydrochloride) at M1 muscarinic receptors of rabbit vas deferens, M2 receptors of rat left atria and M3 receptors of rat ileum. Furthermore, N-[3H]-methylscopolamine competition binding experiments were performed to obtain its affinities for the five cloned human muscarinic receptors (m1-m5) stably expressed in CHO-K1 cells. Pirenzepine served as a reference drug throughout all experiments. 2. In all preparations used, UH-AH 37 interacted with muscarinic receptors in a fashion characteristic of a simple competitive antagonist. 3. In the functional studies, UH-AH 37, like pirenzepine, showed high affinity for M1 (pA2 8.49) and low affinity for M2 muscarinic receptors (pA2 6.63). In contrast to pirenzepine, UH-AH 37 also displayed high affinity for M3 receptors (pA2 8.04). 4. In agreement with its functional profile, UH-AH 37 bound with highest affinity to m1 (pKi 8.74) and with lowest affinity to m2 receptors (pKi 7.35). Moreover, it showed a 7 fold higher affinity for m3 (pKi 8.19) than for m2 receptors, whereas pirenzepine bound to both receptors with low affinities. 5. The binding affinity of UH-AH 37 for m4 and m5 receptors (pKi 8.32 for both receptors) was only ca. 2.5 fold lower than that for m1 receptors, while the corresponding affinity differences were 6 and 13 fold in case of pirenzepine. 6. In conclusion, the receptor selectivity profile of UH-AH 37 differs clearly from that of its parent compound, pirenzepine, in both functional and radioligand binding studies, the major characteristics being its pronounced M2 (m2)/M3 (m3) selectivity. UH-AH 37 thus represents a useful tool for the further pharmacological characterization of muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2043926      PMCID: PMC1917874          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1991.tb12161.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  32 in total

1.  80% of muscarinic receptors expressed by the NB-OK 1 human neuroblastoma cell line show high affinity for pirenzepine and are comparable to rat hippocampus M1 receptors.

Authors:  M Waelbroeck; J Camus; M Tastenoy; J Christophe
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1988-01-04       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Cardioselective profile of AF-DX 116, a muscarine M2 receptor antagonist.

Authors:  A Giachetti; R Micheletti; E Montagna
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1986-05-05       Impact factor: 5.037

3.  Primary structure of porcine cardiac muscarinic acetylcholine receptor deduced from the cDNA sequence.

Authors:  T Kubo; A Maeda; K Sugimoto; I Akiba; A Mikami; H Takahashi; T Haga; K Haga; A Ichiyama; K Kangawa
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1986-12-15       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  Cloning, sequencing and expression of complementary DNA encoding the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  T Kubo; K Fukuda; A Mikami; A Maeda; H Takahashi; M Mishina; T Haga; K Haga; A Ichiyama; K Kangawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Oct 2-8       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  pA2 and receptor differentiation: a statistical analysis of competitive antagonism.

Authors:  R J Tallarida; A Cowan; M W Adler
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1979-08-20       Impact factor: 5.037

6.  Selectivity of muscarinic antagonists in radioligand and in vivo experiments for the putative M1, M2 and M3 receptors.

Authors:  H N Doods; M J Mathy; D Davidesko; K J van Charldorp; A de Jonge; P A van Zwieten
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Identification of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes.

Authors:  T I Bonner; N J Buckley; A C Young; M R Brann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Stereochemical analogs of a muscarinic, ganglionic stimulant. 2. Cis and trans olefinic, epoxide, and cyclopropane analogs related to 4-[N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamoyloxy]-2-butynyltrimethylammonium chloride (McN-A-343).

Authors:  W L Nelson; D S Freeman; F F Vincenzi
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  A search for selective antagonists at M2 muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  R B Barlow; M K Shepherd
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Binding profile of a novel cardioselective muscarine receptor antagonist, AF-DX 116, to membranes of peripheral tissues and brain in the rat.

Authors:  R Hammer; E Giraldo; G B Schiavi; E Monferini; H Ladinsky
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1986-05-05       Impact factor: 5.037

View more
  10 in total

1.  Receptor binding studies of soft anticholinergic agents.

Authors:  F Huang; P Buchwald; C E Browne; H H Farag; W M Wu; F Ji; G Hochhaus; N Bodor
Journal:  AAPS PharmSci       Date:  2001

2.  Design, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic evaluation of a new class of soft anticholinergics.

Authors:  Fenglei Huang; Clinton E Browne; Whei-Mei Wu; Attila Juhász; Fubao Ji; Nicholas Bodor
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations of the zwitterionic metabolite of a new series of N-substituted soft anticholinergics.

Authors:  Whei-Mei Wu; Peter Buchwald; Nobuhiro Mori; Fubao Ji; JiaXiang Wu; Nicholas Bodor
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  A muscarinic receptor different from the M1, M2, M3 and M4 subtypes mediates the contraction of the rabbit iris sphincter.

Authors:  I T Bognar; U Altes; C Beinhauer; I Kessler; H Fuder
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Live-cell microscopy or fluorescence anisotropy with budded baculoviruses-which way to go with measuring ligand binding to M4 muscarinic receptors?

Authors:  Maris-Johanna Tahk; Jane Torp; Mohammed A S Ali; Dmytro Fishman; Leopold Parts; Lukas Grätz; Christoph Müller; Max Keller; Santa Veiksina; Tõnis Laasfeld; Ago Rinken
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Effects of disrupting the cholinergic system on short-term spatial memory in rats.

Authors:  J S Andrews; J H Jansen; S Linders; A Princen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Selectivity of oxomemazine for the M1 muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  S W Lee; C W Woo; J G Kim
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.946

8.  Two populations of muscarinic binding sites in the chick heart distinguished by affinities for ligands and selective inactivation.

Authors:  J Jakubík; S Tucek
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  A split luciferase-based probe for quantitative proximal determination of Gαq signalling in live cells.

Authors:  Timo Littmann; Takeaki Ozawa; Carsten Hoffmann; Armin Buschauer; Günther Bernhardt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Multitargeting nature of muscarinic orthosteric agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Jaromir Myslivecek
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.755

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.