| Literature DB >> 29240819 |
Patrycja Boguta1, Zofia Sokołowska1, Kamil Skic1.
Abstract
Thermogravimetry-coupled with differential scanning calorimetry, quadrupole mass spectrometry, and Fourier-transform infrared spectrosEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29240819 PMCID: PMC5730223 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Chemical properties of soil HAs and FAs (data for HAs previously reported in Boguta and Sokołowska [27]).
| HA/FA origin | HA/FA no | C | H | N | O (S) | C/N | COOH | OH | E2/E6 | ΔlogK | E2/E4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil type | Soil location | Soil pH H2O/KCl | (atomic %) | (cmol kg-1) | |||||||||
| Stagnic Luvisol (Grey-brown soil) | 50°38N /22°41’E | 5.94/5.28 | FA1 | 37.3 | 34.0 | 1.34 | 27.3 | 27.9 | 632 | 229 | 147.7 | 1.07 | 14.26 |
| HA1 | 43.8 | 35.2 | 2.13 | 18.8 | 20.5 | 260 | 239 | 41.8 | 0.75 | 6.77 | |||
| Haplic Fluvisol (Alluvial soil) | 51°09’N /22°59’E | 6.56/5.89 | FA2 | 36.9 | 33.0 | 1.59 | 28.5 | 23.1 | 690 | 179 | 200.2 | 1.13 | 19.14 |
| HA2 | 40.9 | 35.6 | 3.27 | 20.2 | 12.5 | 321 | 329 | 28.8 | 0.70 | 5.37 | |||
| Mollic Gleysol (Black Earth) | 50°22’N /23°39’E | 7.88/7.89 | FA3 | 39.2 | 33.2 | 2.22 | 25.3 | 17.7 | 561 | 224 | 211.2 | 1.16 | 15.21 |
| HA3 | 39.4 | 36.7 | 2.72 | 21.2 | 14.5 | 424 | 246 | 67.5 | 0.89 | 9.54 | |||
| Haplic Cambisol (Brown Soil) | 51°23’N /22°35’E | 4.45/3.57 | FA4 | 38.7 | 33.6 | 1.08 | 26.6 | 35.9 | 649 | 290 | 283.2 | 1.20 | 17.54 |
| HA4 | 36.6 | 39.4 | 2.27 | 21.7 | 16.2 | 411 | 330 | 31.6 | 0.67 | 5.55 | |||
Fig 1Thermogravimetric curves (TG) with first derivatives (dTG) of exemplary FAs and HAs.
TG, MS and DSC characteristics of soil HAs and FAs at temperature ranges R1, R2 and R3.
| Thermogravimetry | Mass Spectrometry | Diff. Scann. Calorimetry | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | ΔM | A m/z = 16 | A m/z = 17 | A m/z = 18 | A m/z = 44 | MaxDSC | Hexo (DSC) | ||||||||||||||
| (%) | (A·s) | (mW/mg/min) | (J/g) | ||||||||||||||||||
| R1 | R2 | R3 | Rtot | HTD | R1 | R2 | R3 | R1 | R2 | R3 | R1 | R2 | R3 | R1 | R2 | R3 | R1 | R2 | R3 | (R2+R3) | |
| 6.8 | 36.8 | 13.3 | 56.8 | 18.7 | 81 | 638 | 432 | 229 | 839 | 589 | 853 | 2388 | 1403 | 218 | 1613 | 269 | 0.41 | 1.80 | 3.55 | 1190 | |
| 4.5 | 26.7 | 9.2 | 40.3 | 13.6 | 22 | 526 | 456 | 239 | 973 | 612 | 922 | 2780 | 1405 | 89 | 940 | 52 | 0.29 | 1.59 | 2.71 | 1122 | |
| 7.6 | 35.3 | 13.3 | 56.2 | 17.7 | 103 | 677 | 338 | 303 | 835 | 553 | 1017 | 2386 | 1369 | 278 | 1735 | 340 | 0.34 | 1.66 | 3.52 | 1095 | |
| 4.8 | 32.3 | 13.3 | 50.4 | 15.3 | 15 | 540 | 535 | 181 | 914 | 674 | 772 | 2565 | 1489 | 93 | 1068 | 171 | 0.47 | 1.38 | 3.24 | 1226 | |
| 6.8 | 36.7 | 13.2 | 56.6 | 18.5 | 69 | 626 | 501 | 244 | 892 | 625 | 895 | 2581 | 1430 | 215 | 1583 | 266 | 0.48 | 1.46 | 4.39 | 969 | |
| 4.8 | 34.0 | 14.6 | 53.3 | 15.2 | 30 | 555 | 562 | 186 | 899 | 682 | 745 | 2562 | 1597 | 114 | 1135 | 161 | 0.34 | 1.07 | 2.76 | 1015 | |
| 7.3 | 37.7 | 14.2 | 59.2 | 19.3 | 77 | 679 | 513 | 270 | 837 | 591 | 901 | 2400 | 1423 | 240 | 1768 | 317 | 0.40 | 1.82 | 3.80 | 1425 | |
| 4.7 | 33.8 | 13.3 | 51.8 | 15.8 | 20 | 536 | 527 | 162 | 890 | 623 | 783 | 2537 | 1515 | 98 | 1051 | 133 | - | 1.13 | 2.38 | 1268 | |
ΔM: mass change; A: area of m/z; MaxDSC: maximum of energetic effect in given temperature range read out from dDSC; Hexo (DSC)–heat of the exoenergetic effect in 220–650°C; R1: temperature range 40–220°C; R2: temperature range 220–430°C; R3: temperature range 430–650°C; Rtot: temperature range 40–650°C; HTD: humification index based on thermal decomposition.
Fig 2Curves of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and first derivatives (dDSC) of exemplary FA and HA.
Experimental and reference data of weight loss at individual temperature ranges for humic and fulvic acids of different origin and for various conditions of thermogravimetric measurements.
| Sample | Conditions | Step1 | ΔM1 | Step2 | ΔM2 | Step3 | ΔM3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (°C) | (%) | (°C) | (%) | (°C) | (%) | ||
| Soil HAs | N2, TG-DSC-MS-FTIR | 40–220 | 4.5–4.8 | 220–430 | 26.7–34 | 430–650 | 9.2–14.6 |
| Soil FAs | N2 TG-DSC-MS-FTIR | 40–220 | 6.8–7.6 | 220–430 | 35.3–37.7 | 430–650 | 13.2 |
| Aquatic HAs [ | N2, TG | 40–100 | 4.6–7.7 | 270–440 | 53.6–59.1 | n.d. | n.d. |
| Aquatic FAs [ | N2, TG | 40–100 | 5.4–10.1 | 270–440 | 44.7–63.2 | n.d. | n.d. |
| Gley soil HS [ | N2, TG-DTA | 40–190 | 17.1 | 190–435 | 18.63 | 435–567 | 6.44 |
| Stream sediment HAs [ | N2, TG | 60–90 | ~6.7 | 260–350 | 16–30 | 350–900 | |
| Tropical Soils HS [ | He, TG-DSC-MS | <180–220 | n.d. | 180–325 | 5.2–9.1 | 325–540 | 11.1–28.1 |
| Temperate Soils HS [ | He, TG-DSC-MS | <160–180 | n.d. | 160–540 | 5.1–11.9 | 180–540 | 8.9–28.1 |
| Chromic Luvisol FA [ | O2, TG | 30–105 | 2,25–8,75 | 105–350 | 35.2–75.3 | 350–600 | 24.7–64.8 |
| Chromic Luvisol HA [ | O2, TG | 30–105 | 5,67–15,81 | 105–350 | 28.2–64.8 | 350–600 | 35.2–71.8 |
| Lignite HAs [ | Air, TG-DSC | <250 | 6.4–7.9 | 250–440 | 70–80.5 | 445–510 | 14.2 |
| Mangrove swamp sediments FAs [ | Air, TG | 30–107 | 10.8–13.0 | 101–418 | 33.9–40.5 | 371–600 | 46.5–55.3 |
| Gley soil HS [ | Air, TG-DTA | 40–173 | 12.5 | 173–627 | 39.45 | 627–954 | 31.9 |
Fig 3The distribution of the ion current (IC) of the main m/z intensities for (a) FA1 and (b) HA1.
Fig 4FTIR 3D spectrum of the evolved gases of FA3 as a function of temperature.
Frequencies and relationships between the main, characteristic FTIR bands of the gaseous products of thermal decomposition at the maximum temperatures of the DSC effects in R1, R2 and R3 temperature ranges.
| Assignment | Wavenumber | Description of bands | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O-H | 3500–4000 | Water, phenols and alcohols: H-bonded -OH, intermolecular bonded OH: stretching vibrations | |||||||
| N-H | 3500–3300 | Nitrogen compounds: asymmetric stretching vibrations | |||||||
| C-H | 3016–3020 | Aliphatic structures: -CH2, -CH3, CH4: asymmetric stretching vibrations | |||||||
| CO2 | 2400–2240 | Carbon dioxide | |||||||
| C = O | 1900–1650 | Carbonyl compounds (ketones, aldehydes, acids): asymmetric stretching vibrations | |||||||
| C = C, C = O | 1650–1530 | Aromatic compounds, carbonyl compounds: asymmetric stretching vibrations | |||||||
| C = C, C-H | 1550–1400 | Aromatic compounds: symmetric stretching vibrations, aliphatic structures: bending vibrations | |||||||
| C-H, C = O | 1390–1250 | Aliphatic structures, carbonyl compounds: symmetric stretching vibrations | |||||||
| O-H | <1200 | Tertiary, secondary, primary alcohols | |||||||
| OH | ~3780 | R3> R1> R2 | R3> R1 = R2 | R3> R1> R2 | R1> R3> R2 | R1> R3 = R2 | R3>R2 | R3> R1 = R2 | R3> R1> R2 |
| OH | ~3590 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3 = R1 | R2>R3 = R1 | R2>R3 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 |
| CH4 | ~3016 | R3 | R3 | R3 | R3 | R3 | R3 | R3 | R3 |
| CO2 | ~2360 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 |
| COOH | ~1790 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3 = R1 | R2>R3 = R1 | R2>R3 | R2>R3>R1 | R2>R3>R1 |
| C = C arom. | ~1600 | R3>R2>R1 | R3>R2>R1 | R3> R1> R2 | R1>R2>R3 | R1>R2>R3 | R3>R2 | R3>R2>R1 | R3> R1> R2 |
aAbsorbance intensities in R1, R2 and R3 ranges were read at temperatures designated on the basis of dDSC changes
Fig 5FTIR 2D spectra of FA4 (a, c) and HA4 (b, d) for characteristic temperatures of R1, R2 and R3 intervals.
Coefficients of person’s correlations calculated between selected chemical properties of HAs and FAs and the parameters obtained from TG, DSC and MS.
Bold digits highlight statistically significant relationships (p = 0.05).
| C | N | O (S) | C/N | COOH | OH | E2/E6 | ΔlogK | E2/E4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.54 | -0.78 | 0.67 | -0.69 | ||||||
| -0.53 | -0.51 | ||||||||
| 0.24 | 0.55 | -0.60 | -0.36 | -0.51 | 0.73 | -0.35 | -0.41 | -0.57 | |
| -0.08 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.67 | ||||||
| 0.65 | -0.60 | 0.23 | -0.71 | -0.72 | -0.77 | ||||
| 0.40 | -0.69 | 0.53 | -0.62 | -0.58 | -0.70 | ||||
| -0.04 | -0.64 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.52 | -0.69 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.70 | |
| 0.57 | -0.56 | 0.15 | -0.62 | -0.62 | -0.69 | ||||
| 0.01 | 0.66 | -0.57 | -0.59 | -0.47 | 0.50 | -0.54 | -0.51 | -0.58 | |
| -0.54 | -0.76 | 0.68 | -0.61 | 0.91 | 0.94 | ||||
| -0.56 | -0.76 | 0.72 | -0.49 | ||||||
| -0.64 | -0.61 | 0.59 | -0.41 | ||||||
| -0.24 | 0.21 | 0.20 | -0.12 | 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.05 | |
| -0.01 | 0.63 | 0.57 | -0.40 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.66 | |||
| -0.15 | -0.38 | 0.68 | 0.41 | 0.66 | -0.40 | ||||
| -0.48 | 0.46 | -0.11 | 0.74 | 0.70 | |||||
| -0.63 | -0.70 | 0.68 | -0.27 |
Fig 6Exemplary relationships between TG-DSC-QMS-FTIR parameters and chemical properties of FAs and HAs (a) N content and C/N ratio vs. m/z = 17 area at R3; (b) COOH and O content vs. m/z = 18 area at R2; (c) COOH content vs. m/z = 44 area at R1, R2 and R3; (d) COOH content and E2/E6 ratio vs. HTD index.