| Literature DB >> 26953147 |
Fei Guo1,2, Fengchang Wu2, Yunsong Mu2, Yan Hu2, Xiaoli Zhao2, Wei Meng2, John P Giesy3,4, Ying Lin5.
Abstract
Organic matter (OM) has been characterized using thermal analysis in O2 atmospheres, but it is not clear if OM can be characterized using slow thermal degradation in N2 atmospheres (STDN). This article presents a new method to estimate the behavior of OM in anaerobic environment. Seventeen different plants from Tai Lake (Ch: Taihu), China were heated to 600 °C at a rate of 10 °C min(-1) in a N2 atmosphere and characterized by use of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA). DSC chromatograms were compared with 9 standard compounds. Seven peaks were observed in DSC chromatograms, 2 main peaks strongly correlated with biochemical indices, and one main peak was a transitional stage. Energy absorbed by a peak at approximately 200 °C and total organic carbon were well correlated, while energy absorbed at approximately 460 °C was negatively correlated with lignin content. Presence of peaks at approximately 350 and 420 °C varied among plant biomass sources, providing potential evidence for biomass identification. Methods of STDN reported here were rapid and accurate ways to quantitatively characterize OM, which may provide useful information for understanding anaerobic behaviors of natural organic matters.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26953147 PMCID: PMC4782168 DOI: 10.1038/srep22877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Thermal indices of plant samples (Fn is an endothermic or exothermic peak, and An is area of Fn, which means energy absorbed.
| No. | F1 (J/g) | T1 (°C) | F2 (J/g) | T2 (°C) | F3 (J/g) | T3 (°C) | F4 (J/g) | T4 (°C) | F4 b(J/g) | T4 b(°C) | F5 (J/g) | T5 (°C) | Fx (J/g) | Tx (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.37 | 104.25 | 14.85 | 177.38 | 8.42 | 308.82 | −31.81 | 313.35 | ||||||
| 2 | 5.90 | 107.46 | 27.23 | 206.66 | 9.93 | 301.65 | 1.20 | 358.07 | 4.51 | 469.31 | −60.85 | 303.26 | ||
| 3 | 0.72 | 98.73 | 18.27 | 193.13 | 12.62 | 309.28 | −75.10 | 312.94 | ||||||
| 4 | 0.03 | 99.15 | 24.92 | 175.87 | 37.92 | 318.98 | 0.88 | 471.13 | −37.31 | 333.43 | ||||
| 5 | 4.03 | 104.89 | 34.87 | 180.87 | 30.94 | 303.86 | 0.41 | 437.09 | 2.04 | 474.84 | −30.29 | 320.30 | ||
| 6 | 2.55 | 95.04 | 31.36 | 198.72 | 25.35 | 303.80 | 0.44 | 473.27 | −29.40 | 319.79 | ||||
| 7 | 2.22 | 93.52 | 19.82 | 193.87 | 15.20 | 289.89 | 3.44 | 461.09 | −53.35 | 300.87 | ||||
| 8 | 6.72 | 110.14 | 2.89 | 217.72 | 15.06 | 311.77 | 1.47 | 428.33 | 0.71 | 474.32 | −16.08 | 329.59 | ||
| 9 | 32.11 | 195.67 | 16.46 | 292.18 | 4.76 | 344.93 | 4.26 | 444.70 | −71.03 | 300.03 | ||||
| 10 | 3.42 | 100.61 | 14.87 | 177.27 | 11.23 | 309.21 | 2.95 | 353.99 | 1.15 | 423.77 | 2.23 | 472.88 | −13.38 | 321.91 |
| 11 | 3.38 | 107.98 | 9.35 | 201.77 | 14.61 | 307.22 | 2.84 | 351.27 | −9.669 | 321.90 | ||||
| 12 | 16.58 | 209.06 | 17.24 | 297.29 | 1.26 | 347.00 | 0.69 | 476.09 | −37.88 | 308.69 | ||||
| 13 | 20.40 | 213.97 | 10.95 | 287.71 | 6.74 | 349.08 | 1.71 | 445.94 | −39.51 | 295.86 | ||||
| 14 | 16.69 | 184.03 | 17.28 | 285.62 | 2.52 | 347.31 | 0.96 | 451.43 | −29.63 | 301.57 | ||||
| 15 | 1.97 | 93.05 | 48.58 | 187.50 | 19.39 | 277.75 | 8.58 | 346.72 | 10.94 | 436.40 | 7.62 | 466.68 | −136.3 | 280.32 |
| 16 | 37.43 | 202.06 | 9.41 | 314.38 | 0.53 | 404.17 | 4.56 | 480.47 | −101.1 | 316.29 | ||||
| 17 | 28.58 | 186.50 | 9.19 | 453.97 | −129.4 | 323.12 |
Tn is the peak temperature of Fn (n is 1, 2, 3, 4, 4b, 5 and x respectively). Blank means no peak was observed in this scan).
Figure 1Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) scans of D-arabinose, cellulose and lignin (a) and DSC scans of HA from Sigma and plant 5 from Taihu lake (b).
Probability of F3b and F4 peaks shown in different plant types.
| Peak type | Emerged plants | Submerged plants | Floating plants | Terrestrial plants | All plants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F3b | 25% | 33% | 100% | 50% | 50% |
| F4 | 0 | 50% | 0 | 50% | 27.5% |
Figure 2DSC and DTG overlay analysis of lignin (DSC, differential scanning calorimetry; DTG, derivative thermogravimetric analysis).
Figure 3Lag relationship of peak F2 and peak Fx in DSC-DTG scans of standard samples (glucose, xylose, D-Arabinose, L-Arabinose, L-Rhamnose, D-Galactose, cellulose, lignin).
Figure 4Correlation between peak F2 and TOC (a) and correlation between peak F5 and content of lignin (b) (DSC, differential scanning calorimetry; TOC, total organic carbon).